First, I'm a woman. It would be super cool if GAF could eventually get past this assumption that everyone here is a man.
Second, don't be reductive. Of course I don't agree with everything every candidate I've voted for has supported; it's a matrix of factors that leads to a decision unless someone is a single-issue voter, which is its own problem and really not worth discussing. What I'm arguing here is that everything Trump supported during the campaign was grounded in racism, misogyny, and/or entitlement. All of his major campaign platform points, every one of them, can be linked to attacking minorities, women, the poor, or xenophobia, or all of the above.
Sorry about that, I would say in my defense that I was using probabilities to drive that, but I would be lying, its just a bad habit on my part.
The don't be reductive is exactly the point here, by saying that these people are all xenophobic, racists, misogynists and so on, or that they are acceptance of it is to be reductive of their views, there is a plethora of reasons to vote for someone, even if I don't agree with any of them.
I would also be quite surprised if there weren't xenophobes, racists, misogynists and homophones voting for Hillary, but those people probably decided there were more important things so they voted for Hillary based on those things they deemed more important.
Also not sure if every one of his major campaign platform points were linked to what you are saying, certainly not for a lot of people that voted, I mean sure trump might "want" to bring jobs back from china because he is a xenophobe and honestly a complete idiot (the jobs outsourced to china tend to be pretty awful low paid work), but doubt "fuck the Chinese" was what people were hearing when Trump talked about that.
Why do you think that education happened in the first place?
Germany was beaten into the ground, cut up, and shamed on a world stage. Millions of Germans were dead and their infrastructure was bombed into a wasteland. The Nuremberg Trials saw Nazis condemned for their crimes and hanged.
Sure, but that is because you couldn't possibly educate a regime that wouldn't allow to even talk negatively about the regime, let alone create an education system that enlightened people about the horrors of it, I'm not saying lets change North Korea by debating them.
America is quite a bit better than Nazi Germany, so the extermination of millions of people is an unneeded step to get to a better education, I mean while homophobia is still unfortunately a major issue, it has been improving and it has improved by educating the population on the subject, instead of killing homophobes and name calling.