Interfectum
Member
nazi, hitler, etc, etc
Agreed. And let's agree that those who kill people through drunken negligence deserve less praise and sympathy than those who do not.
I'm shocked how classy the comments have been on the huff post considering how polarizing he is. I really expected "reTHUGlican" & "Teabagger!" every other comment. But most have been respectful.
Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo wrote a poignant piece about Breitbart today - http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/03/breitbart_rip.php?ref=fpblg
Like many here I disagreed vehemently with his politics and how he conducted his journalism, but it doesn't detract from the suddenness of his death and the pain in the loved ones he left behind.
I think it's worse to advocate for wars that kill thousands of innocents and smear and destroy organizations that keep people from losing their homes but maybe that's just me.
Natural causes. That is so over-played nowdays, natural causes this, natural causes that...what next...cause "unknown"? Ahah
If Ann Coulter weren't the (she)male Ann Coulter, then Breitbart would have been the male Ann Coulter.
Not really. Ann Coulter is an intentionally inflammatory troll. Breitbart simply had anger and control issues.
Cocaine is naturalHaven't read the whole thread. Dying at 43 isn't natural at all. What the fuck did this guy die of? Unless it's some kind of congenial heart defect then nature had nothing to do with it.
Not really. Ann Coulter is an intentionally inflammatory troll. Breitbart simply had anger and control issues.
Breitbart didn't have anger or control issues. He was not only intentionally but publicly declared he was an inflammatory troll.Not really. Ann Coulter is an intentionally inflammatory troll. Breitbart simply had anger and control issues.
When it comes down to it, Breitbart was nothing more than a windbag. He had no power in government, so to equate his ramblings with somehow actually being responsible for those wars, is crazy.
You mean to tell me that the James O'Keefe thing wasn't an intentionally inflammatory troll job? Or the manufactured Shirley Sherrod "scandal"?
Agreed. And let's agree that those who kill people through drunken negligence deserve less praise and sympathy than those who do not.
You mean to tell me that the James O'Keefe thing wasn't an intentionally inflammatory troll job? Or the manufactured Shirley Sherrod "scandal"?
Breitbart didn't have anger or control issues. He was not only intentionally but publicly declared he was an inflammatory troll.
Coulter just pretends she isn't.
What will be the verdict on GWB? The drunken may or may not apply, but the negligence certainly does. Ok to trash him after his death?
What did he do wrong?
oh you so funnyWhat did he do wrong?
Negligently failed to do due diligence resulting in a disastrous war that killed thousands.
No he didn't
No he didn't
New York City.
lolThe two aren't quite the same. Coulter strikes me as a genuine conservative who plays up the heartless stereotype and vile rhetoric to enrage liberals.
Breitbart regularly went out drinking with NYC conservatives when he was in town, him wandering down to OWS and being a dick isn't anything shocking imo.Keep in mind Breitbart was just previously drinking just before the events of his lashing out at the protesters.
Were you the guy that said that the Bush administration wasn't responsible for any war crimes in that thread about Greece? It's been a while and I've forgotten.
Nice
critique him? yes. Trash him? no.What will be the verdict on GWB? The drunken may or may not apply, but the negligence certainly does. Ok to trash him after his death?
lol
Breitbart regularly went out drinking with NYC conservatives when he was in town, him wandering down to OWS and being a dick isn't anything shocking imo.
There weren't any war crimes.
Nice
Certain individual criminal acts, nothing more.War rape and desecrating corpses are war crimes that happened under the Iraq war are war crimes. Some of them were tried, others weren't.
Certain individual criminal acts, nothing more.
Agreed. And let's agree that those who kill people through drunken negligence deserve less praise and sympathy than those who do not.
They're still war crimes and you agreed that they have happened.
Why you gotta bring Laura Bush into this?
I mean individual criminal acts of certain soldiers that occurred during war, using "war crimes" is a loaded term *snip*
How fast before FoxNews and the Republicans attempt the sympathy vote?
Why you gotta bring Laura Bush into this?
What?!
y'know, instead of saying "what?" you can google.What?!
No it wasn't. Can you show me when the US broke the Don't Invade Iraq Law Congress passed?The war in and of itself can be considered an illegal war of aggression.
War crimes happened.