The Freeman
Member
I'll be too busy playing Overwatch still to care.
That or knee deep in Titanfall 2 depending on when that's released
That or knee deep in Titanfall 2 depending on when that's released
I understand. I buy season passes for my favorite titles even though I probably shouldn't since they are a rip off. A few maps for the price of a full game.I bought the season pass, that's the issue. I always go back to the old games anyway but with COD4 remastered weeks away? Forget it.
I used to love the zombies mode so much. Now its just become a convoluted chore, where, to me, it should just be about survival like the old days.lmao the hate is strong here ,
I only care about Black Ops 3 DLC 4 , last zombie map will be epic ¡¡¡¡
I gotta give credit to Advanced Warfare on this one. They handled Zombies way better than Treyarch did.If this game takes place in the future, then why the Hell are we still fighting zombies? You would think with all the technology that this would have been wiped out or been replaced by a more menacing threat like a robot uprising.
I would say "like usual" but unfortunately, it's a step back from Black Ops 3, which revealed both single player and multiplayer at E3, which was the right decision. Also the beta was in late august, but many people could see how BO3 would look like in MP way before on Youtube.
Infinity Ward/Activision aren't confident at all to show the MP of Infinite Warfare, and meanwhile Battlefield 1 will build even more appeal as they will reveal their MP this E3.
Also that means no beta until at least the end of CoD XP. Surely late september or early october.
Yeah, it sucks for those who primarily, or only wants COD4, i can see that. Business wise, i guess that Activision sees it as too risky move to release a $20 or $30 competitior (even if its an "old game") to the main game on the same day.Oh its a certainty.
Its just unfortunate that they want to split the community so bad.
Sure, but if you value COD4 something, then its not a $80 paywall. I just wanted to comment on that =) You can always sell Infinite Warfare if you have no interest in it. Maybe some extra work, but at least it will bring the price down for COD4. Otherwise its best to wait for the standalone release.I do value Infinite Warfare at zero because I don't want to play it, which makes COD4 cost €84 (cheapest legacy edition in Finland right now) which is total bullshit and I'm not paying that much for a remastered old game with half of the content missing.
What's wrong with this game and why is everyone displeased about it? Haven't been following.
Usually the zombies mode takes place in the past, like how Black Ops 2 zombies is set in the 30s and Black Ops 3 is set in the 40s. I'd assume this game will follow suit.If this game takes place in the future, then why the Hell are we still fighting zombies? You would think with all the technology that this would have been wiped out or been replaced by a more menacing threat like a robot uprising.
Every weapons have their advantages and disadvantages. The Marshal 16 is powerful, but has poor range and slow reload. Other secondary weapons have an advantage in those fields..
Secondary weapons are short range, and Marshall is OP as hell (and yes at master level 400 +, almost 70,000 kills, 2.5 KD, I kinda know this). The only counter is another shotgun (primary)...Maybe you know better, but I dont come across many who played as much as me period.
Dont get me started on dual crossbow spam. And yes, with so much time played I had half the DLC guns anyway but I could not support this shit anymore.
Anyway, I bought Bo3 digitally with season pass, like I do every year, Activision shat on me and I felt cheated, I will move to Battlefield this year.
Only If numbers go down will activision halt the pay 2 win onslaught that has begun.
Yes, but the other secondary weapons have longer range and faster reload. The Marshal 16 has an advantage when it comes to power, definitelly, but at the same time, it has disadvantages in range and reload speed. If you miss or are a bit out of range, you might be fucked due to the slow reload speed. I just feel that its not really that much of an advantage. Depends on which type of situation you're in.
Yes, it depends on what type of situation you're in. Here you're describing one situation with a smaller room. It also depends on if you're playing standard or Hardcore mode. I used to play quite a bit on Hardcore using the RK5 when going for the 1000 pistol kills challenge. I could take down people from a good distance, the Marshal 16 cant do that.No, you enter a room, you know its size, you switch to a Marshall, you either win or take down the first guy. No other gun can do that. Its broken, as is the NX dual wield crossbow (and yes I have it but dont use it as it pisses people off).
The garand was OP at launch (OP silenced range) but they nerfed it (I remember bombing Vandahaar tweets #p2w until they did).
Anyway, I wont support this shit in this or any other game, its a fucking terrible way to treat your fanbase and they know it.
Yes, it depends on what type of situation you're in. Here you're describing one situation with a smaller room.
It also depends on if you're playing standard or Hardcore mode. I used to play quite a bit on Hardcore using the RK5. I could take down people from a good distance, the Marshal 16 cant do that.
No, i havnt unlocked any dark matter. Never really checked into how to unlock that. I went for the 1000 kills with pistol challenge.LOL all normal guns are good in hardcore (who shoots first). Did you do dark matter ? I could snipe people across the map with Mr6 with high calibre, so what, it has nothing to do with core game balance.
Call of Duty®: Infinite Warfare Zombies
I gotta give credit to Advanced Warfare on this one. They handled Zombies way better than Treyarch did.
Pretty nice, 60 fps, makes for smooth gameplay and good controller response but the server side lag bogs that down a bit.Oh you've played it already? How does it play? Smooth? How many weapons? Movement system?
Oh wait..
That's what I'm saying!Will go if Kanye comes back. Best $80 spent.
COD has never had a beta at E3, or any other game in the genre that I can remember. BO3's beta was in August last year and that was the first time they'd had one in 8 years. All other CODs before BO3 unveiled MP around the Aug/Sept. timeframe so this is completely normal.So we don't even get the beta during E3?
The most important part of the game is being revealed a month before release. Speaks of Confidence!!
People here don't seem to know much about the standard Call of Duty media roll out. It's always pretty much like this.
People here don't seem to know much about the standard Call of Duty media roll out. It's always pretty much like this.
Oh, this is an old thread.
I thought we were getting a beta? I signed up for something after I pre-ordered on their website. I don't remember the exact verbage but it said "future rewards" or something to that affect.
Probably just e-mails about the DLCs
It was standard when they only had two years and were still working hard up until release. Now they have three years.
MP reveal usually happens in August. Last year happened in june with a beta in august.
To a lot of people this says that Activision has little confidence in IW's multiplayer.
It was standard when they only had two years and were still working hard up until release. Now they have three years.
MP reveal usually happens in August. Last year happened in june with a beta in august.
To a lot of people this says that Activision has little confidence in IW's multiplayer.
These 3 year cycles don't seem to be helping that much thus far, do they. Advanced Warfare had great mechanics but was totally botched by network and balance factors, Black Ops 3 I just personally didn't like at all. So much money being poured into these games, everything just seems to be watered down.
I'm still hopeful enough, though. The weapons I saw looked really cool. And yea, if nothing else, I'd love to go back to a pretty looking Modern Warfare.
I am excited about this game as I am every year. I know the big selling point for many is COD 4. That game came out a long time ago and the MP has changed a ton since then. I wonder if the memory of playing the game will end up being better than the reality.
Oh wow, that's really late...and no beta either.
Excited and nervous about MW Remastered gameplay. God I hope they haven't fucked it.
Is it though?
Using we get this at the start of the Basketball season... Which is like October
It was standard when they only had two years and were still working hard up until release. Now they have three years.
MP reveal usually happens in August. Last year happened in june with a beta in august.
To a lot of people this says that Activision has little confidence in IW's multiplayer.
Literally nothing and literally no good reason.