Glad to see this is the case. I really wasn't too happy with PSN last night.
What's wrong with PSN? It seemed to be downloading at a decent clip on my ps3.
Glad to see this is the case. I really wasn't too happy with PSN last night.
Nice to see that the two versions are identical
But why not add that 3rd option if its there? If being so serious about the differences.
Lets be honest. A PC that plays everything on highest settings/60fps is not that expensive.
It is not a GLITCH.the texture thing is a glitch, this should easily get fixed on the 360 with a title update.
About the minor graphical difference, they have next to none impact. Especially not as big as asset streaming issue.There's a few others mentioned in the article though they're not as big ..
- 360 has better reflection on indoor mirrors
Fuck, i bought it for 360 based on R*'s previous history... and i have both consoles.. and the online on ps3 would've been free.
Oh well, i'll double dip for the PC version anyway.
I did. Negligible nitpick differences mean it's down to controller preference.Did you read the same article that I did? :/
What's wrong with PSN? It seemed to be downloading at a decent clip on my ps3.
It's not a huge deal to be honest.
What's also strange is that he was the one who posted the last two faceoffs on Gaf where 360 got the nod, but was somehow late on this one for some odd reason.For someone who desperately waits for DF comparisons to determine which version and platform is superior, someone is having a hard time accepting the fact that their own choice of platform this time wasn't DF's preferred platform to play GTAV on.
Yes it is. It's more than any console will cost and the upgrades are a lot more common (non existent on consoles) (source: I'm a PC gamer with a 'decent' rig).
I've made my point abundantly clear about it in previous posts and I feel like I'm going in circles here. If you would like to know why I think they aren't clear, go ahead and read my post history.
Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.Did you read the same article that I did? :/
Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.
To not declare them even is weird.
.
Ah they both had advantages in certain areas in framerate.Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.
To not declare them even is weird.
.
You missed the part where the framerate is sometimes better on PS3 too. To declare them even would be weird. They are clearly different, and the pros and cons do not simply cancel each other out.Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.
To not declare them even is weird.
.
Why exactly are people against this kind of examination? The only reason "I" could see someone being against it is if they had a stake in the "console war", really.Oh for god sake, stop encouraging Digital Foundry.
One again no difference you can see whatsoever unless you sit 1/2 a foot away from your TV with your eyes pressed to the glass.
It is not a GLITCH.
Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.
To not declare them even is weird.
Can these problems be fixed with a patch?Yeah the 360 version has a texture load bug but has a better frame rate.
To not declare them even is weird.
.
i don't think it's a glitch.
maybe 24TMU (RSX) versus 16TMU (Xenos) is the reason
their conclusion is odd
if you dont install the play disc on 360, both stream assets at the same rate, or if you do install the play disc, install to usb storage
if you install both discs on the hdd, then you get streaming asset issues (same as psn edition)
Even Quaz51 is back. I feel we have come full circle.
He is the guy who dropped the GTA4 PS3 sub-hd bomb back in the day
It seems it has been a negative news day for the Xbox fans, between this and Ryse running at 900p only
All we need is some Alan Wake screenshots now, eh schennmu
Ugh. Debating about whether opening my 360 SE or getting a PS3 SE on the way home from Target - because I am that picky of an asshole.
It's pretty silly especially with the PS4 having an advantage next gen. The PS3 vs 360 stuff is academic at this point, really.Gotta love the "hahaha PS3 is winnar" posts. Reading the article seems to indicate negligible differences, other than the ground texture issue. But I guess those that own PS3 exclusively need to claim their scare multi-platform related victories when they can.
This does not apply in the HD generation.is PAL version same as NTSC version though? different screen resolution for example (and refresh rate though that shouldnt matter)