Dark FaZe said:I don't usually care about the Edge but the Borderlands score is wrong imo.
MAN HAS OPINION ABOUT MAN'S OPINION. NEWS AT 11.
I fucking hate these threads. Stop doing them.
Dark FaZe said:I don't usually care about the Edge but the Borderlands score is wrong imo.
ShockingAlberto said:GAF never knows what it wants from reviews.
If reviews are what the individual reviewer thinks, GAF goes crazy. How dare that person think they speak for many? I don't care what their thoughts and preferences are, this game is objectively amazing, and should get that score.
If reviews try to explain what kind of consumers would like a game and what kind wouldn't, GAF goes crazy. That's not fair! How can you act like sandbox gamers wouldn't like this, those people are stupid!
Well, wait. There is one scenario where they're satisfied. When the game they likes gets a good score, regardless of why.
This gets especially bad in the fourth quarter, because the games that come out then are "GOTY: Fact". So those games are above criticism by anyone.
Fixed that for ya...McBacon said:I fucking hate these threads. I will stop reading them.
Borderlands is not an RPG at all.Dark FaZe said:I don't usually care about the Edge but the Borderlands score is wrong imo. It's a game that almost flawlessly merges the roleplaying and shooter genres and has some of the most satisfying gunplay of ANY shooter this gen.so long as you stay in your level range :lol
So for a game that is so innovative, looks great, is incredibly polished, has great length, incredible amount of content...I mean it's w/e but that's a poor score imo.
Safe Bet said:*sigh*
I'm really getting sick of the "games are VR!!!" crowd.
Edit:
Seriously though...
That quote shows just how bad the current class of critics are.
Wow, this really is honest. But, this is EXACTLY the kind of crap that is absolutely WRONG with forum dwellers. Although, I still respect that you're honest about your cringe-worthy fanboyism.The-Warning said:The real reason I read reviews, to be honest? When I love a game, I enjoy reading a gushing reviewer who agrees with me, when I hate a game I love when it gets torn apart. I generally don't read reviews to influence my decision to buy a game unless it's some obscure game that's harder to get info on.
Previews and forum impressions and maybe the metacritic score are good enough for me, and I pretty much know what game I'm going to enjoy or not for the most part anyway.
When I love a game and a reviewer starts to nitpick or gives a review less than what I thought it was worth, I cringe. I get annoyed and think the guy is an idiot. I can't help it.
Oh lawd, did you read the bloody review?!Safe Bet said:*sigh*
I'm really getting sick of the "games are VR!!!" crowd.
Edit:
Seriously though...
That quote shows just how bad the current class of critics are.
DennisK4 said:Borderlands is not an RPG at all.
It may have XP and loot but it is no RPG. Repetitive shooter with upgrades is what it is.
But hey, a good game for loot whores I guess...Edge got the score just right.
Rash said:These scores are definitely reasonable.
Though, GTA scoring a 9 and NSBM Wii scoring a 7 hurts.
DennisK4 said:Borderlands is not an RPG at all.
It may have XP and loot but it is no RPG. Repetitive shooter with upgrades is what it is.
But hey, a good game for loot whores I guess...Edge got the score just right.
I admit I stopped reading in utter disgust because I'm sick and fucking tired of people telling me I should want all my games to play like Half-Life when I fucking don't...Vast Inspiration said:Posts like your show just how ignorant and annoying the typical fanboy warriors are.
Borderlands have no story to speak of, it just kind of is there. How are you playing a role then?. Mass Effect was story driven.Dark FaZe said:Fair enough. I could go back and forth with you on what defines a roleplaying game but that would require another thread. I also find someone with an ME avatar accusing borderlands of being a repetitive shooter to be just a bit funny.
Waiiitttt a minute. I'm going to ignore the obvious irony here and ask, if reviews aren't opinions, what are they?Safe Bet said:Fixed that for ya...
And please stop with the 'its just an opinion' shit.
Its fucking childish.
It's obvious you stopped reading considering they never said that.Safe Bet said:I admit I stopped reading in utter disgust because I'm sick and fucking tired of people telling me I should want all my games to play like Half-Life when I fucking don't...
It's saying that it tells a damn good story even though people seem to want to have a first person experience where they are completely immersed. Fuck. Take a reading comprehension class.It is a happy coincidence that, at a time when storytelling in games is being scrutinised as never before, along comes an example to demonstrate the sheer table-thumping power of a rollicking good yarn, even if its one relayed in a manner that may not win it fans among those attempting to reinvent the way games are played. Uncharted 2 propels you through a procession of intricately staged episodes of drama peopled with characters that sizzle with zip and pith, and, in showing you how your reckless treasure-hunting ways adversely affect the lives of others, even asks you to question your morality. At no point, though, are you given the option to change those ways. This is no Infamous. Its obviously not a firstperson action game, either, which leaves the player feeling much less like he is the hero than is the case in contemporary action classics such as Half-Life 2 and Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare, in which the characters you inhabit never utter a word. Conversely, Uncharted 2s returning protagonist, Nathan Drake, tosses out a quip as readily as he draws a breath (even, repeatedly, when faced with a character who quite clearly understands not a single word coming out of our heros mouth). Despite never being short of a comeback, however, he remains likeable throughout the games duration, whether holding his resolve against what seem to be overwhelming odds, carefully picking his way through elaborate locations that belong to other civilisations, or even playing his part in a surprisingly tense love triangle.
Vast Inspiration said:Wow, this really is honest. But, this is EXACTLY the kind of crap that is absolutely WRONG with forum dwellers. Although, I still respect that you're honest about your cringe-worthy fanboyism.
He's stating the game is good DESPITE not playing like Half-Life.Firestorm said:It's obvious you stopped reading considering they never said that.
It's saying that it tells a damn good story even though people seem to want to have a first person experience where they are completely immersed. Fuck. Take a reading comprehension class.
If we don't try and define agreed upon boundaries, discussion becomes impossibly subjective, personal, and pointless.Firestorm said:Waiiitttt a minute. I'm going to ignore the obvious irony here and ask, if reviews aren't opinions, what are they?
The-Warning said:I just enjoy reading what like minded people have to say about something I like. That doesn't mean I'm blind to flaws that are pointed out, and agree with them even. I was just explaining that I generally don't read reviews to help me make a buying decision, mainly more for entertainment purposes.
I just D: and smh whenever I see a gaming mag try to review a fighting game.
Safe Bet said:If we don't try and define agreed upon boundaries, discussion becomes impossibly subjective, personal, and pointless.
Ok dood but thats like YOUR opinion!McBacon said:MAN HAS OPINION ABOUT MAN'S OPINION. NEWS AT 11.
I fucking hate these threads. Stop doing them.
Cromulent_Word said:I love popping open GAF at work, only to find that my studio's game scored a mothafunkin 9 from Edge.
Pardon me while i go give many high-fives
He's saying it's good in a way different from why Half-Life 2 and Call of Duty 4 are good.Safe Bet said:He's stating the game is good DESPITE not playing like Half-Life.
The character is likable DESPITE the fact he talks.
Etc.
I take issue with that.
If we don't try and define agreed upon boundaries, discussion becomes impossibly subjective, personal, and pointless.
zoukka said:Well that's just some fucked up shit right there imo.
And I gotta check UC2 out goddamn. And why are people surprised about the NSMB Wii score? Remember a game called NSMB? It really wasn't all that super...
Seems like a really interesting cover story. Gotta see if I can track an issue down when I go home next weekend!Majora said:Front Cover:
cartman414 said:It's because various previews have predicted it to be the game the original NSMB should have been.
sonicmj1 said:You should send them a strongly worded letter.
Cromulent_Word said:Just found out there is an interview with myself and Capy creative director Kris in the same issue that our game scored a 9...
official craziest/best Edge issue everrrrrrrrrrr!!!
zoukka said:Well that's just some fucked up shit right there imo.
DangerousDave said:The problem is not the 9. 9, in Edge, is a very good score.
But is you look the games that scored 9 and the games that scored 10, in Edge, in similar generes, is pretty obvious that Uncharted 2 should be in the second group.
But is normal that Edge gets more restrictive, with 10, because in the last 2 years they gave more 10 than in the past 10 years.
About LBP, I had no doubt that it was going to receive a 10.
cartman414 said:It's because various previews have predicted it to be the game the original NSMB should have been.