So, I guess we have to wait for E3 for information.
Gamebryo isn't a issue because of the visuals. You don't play Fallout because of the visuals. It's an issue because of the bugs.
Please let this be the first moderns FO title that's been put through at least an competent QA team.
It looks like Fallout 3 with an instagram filter.Fallout 3 modded:
$15.99This needs to be a mod for the dog. I'd totally put that in for a whacky run.
I didn't expect this vitriol to the graphic fidelity of the game. Would you guys rather have the same tired bullshot awesome trailers ala Witcher 3/Watch Dogs and then find out it gets visually downgraded upon release, or would you rather see something that looks a lot like something we're getting upon release?
'Cause I'm super fine of what I saw...because it's finally Fallout 4! Fallout 4! Woo!
As far as its OPEN WORLD competition goes it falls in line nicely
Ah, good point, I hadn't caught that. Crisis reinstated.
It looks like Fallout 3 with an instagram filter.
So its 60fps?
So in your mind saying that this game looks like it could render on a 3DS is the same as just not liking its aesthetic. Right. You said some dumb shit dude, people are allowed to call you on being needlessly hyperbolic.
It is amazing to think that Fallout 4 will launch in the same generation as the Witcher 3.
The witcher 3 looks like a generation ahead of this.
Unless it's running at 60fps like MGSV, it really doesn't.
Doesn't look too shabby but i hope it looks better by launch. Expected a little more from a current gen only game though.
No old gen = YES
Style is similar to Rage, Dishonored art style
Style is similar to Rage, Dishonored art style
Yup.Oh hell ya!! What is the location?? Boston?
-GAF rages demanding Fallout 4 since forever
-Fallout 4 finally revealed
-GAF rages about the graphics, the least important aspect of any game.
GAF in a nutshell.
Unless it's running at 60fps like MGSV, it really doesn't.
People are disappointed with the visuals? Just what the hell were you expecting? It's an open world game from Bethesda. It looks dramatically more detailed than Fallout 3 and seems to feature much more ambitious world design. It looks very good for a game from these guys.
What a contradiction.I honestly hope more games take the low graphic approach. It'll be healthier for the industry in the long term. I'd rather they spend the resources making a more detailed world.
This game was in pre-production since 2008, and full production since 2011 - two years before current gen consoles went on sale and before they even officially existed. Fallout is a series expected to sell 10 million + copies these days. Chances are extremely high this started out as a cross-gen game but shifted to current gen only a year or so ago when Zenimax were convinced by PS4/Xbone adoption rates to ditch the larger install base of last gen.
That explains the lower-than-expected graphic quality. At least we'll easily be seeing 1080p and 30+fps on consoles, and PC gamers know not to worry about visuals in Bethesda Game Studios titles anyway =)
Fallout 3 modded:
I'd honestly believe that was a trailer for a 360 game. Eek.
MGSV is aiming for 60 FPS on consoles? That's craaazy. KojiPro are super cray. But props to them and their engine. May the studio rest in peace.
The whining about graphics in this thread is why devs always announce their games with boring CG trailers.
Good on Bethesda for putting their balls on the table with an in-engine announcement.