He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.PolyGone said:Really? The character close ups look closer to Eternal Sonata to me.
i think the mechanics of this are going to work quite well on wii based on what we know so far.Durante said:I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
Michan said:YES YES YES
Regardless of gender, I'd do them bothat the same time
Eteric Rice said:Post apocolyptic world, you learn things about what happened by reading spray paint on the walls, etc.
but Eternal Sonata looks like a dreamcast game so...PolyGone said:Really? The character close ups look closer to Eternal Sonata to me.
flintstryker said:but Eternal Sonata looks like a dreamcast game so...
That's just a (stupid) meme based on an inane quote (at least I hope it is). Personally I think ES is the most beautiful next-gen JRPG, and I've played/seen them all except for ToV.Darkman M said:Umm no look at some old skies of arcadia screens.
The only "wish it were ported" talk you can't get banned for.Durante said:Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
Durante said:Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
RobertM said:Boku no Pico, look it up.
Durante said:He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
that's usually a safe bet, though with a slower pace and flashlight-directed camera i think this could be workable. we haven't heard too much about how the fighting engine works yet.Cedille said:I bet this game will have a camera issue.
Dunno, IQ looks better than a mediocre PS2 game to me. Oh and every game should've been on PC of course, for better technical realization.Durante said:He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
Fuck me, this thing still happens.Durante said:He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
fresquito said:2009 is going to be an awesome year for Wii owners.
Yeah, the projects started when people finaly realized Wii was winning are slowly coming out into the light.goldenticket said:it really is. this year has kinda been meh to me but 2009 is going to be pretty awesome
50,000 people used to live here...now it's a ghost town.king zell said:
-nk- said:50,000 people used to live here...now it's a ghost town.
I wasn't aware that the Wii could render at 800x600...Phife Dawg said:Dunno, IQ looks better than a mediocre PS2 game to me. Oh and every game should've been on PC of course, for better technical realization.
That shot is definetly old though. I'm not saying this game has shown incredible IQ yet, but I still stand by my opinion that it is nowhere near a mediocre PS2 game (and yes, that includes your shot).dark10x said:I wasn't aware that the Wii could render at 800x600...
My comment was based on this shot...
http://www.inside-games.jp/media/205/20538/0809297278_12.jpg
That shot is 640x480 (Wii resolution) and is the only shot with a full HUD present. I'd say that accurately portrays what we will see on the Wii itself. The game is quite lovely, but the actual IMAGE QUALITY seems rather poor.
Can you not read? I'm not suggesting that the game looks like a mediocre PS2 game, I'm saying that the image quality reminds me of an older PS2 game. You can have fantastic assets on screen with lousy image quality, you know. I don't think the age of the shots have anything to do with that either.Phife Dawg said:That shot is definetly old though. I'm not saying this game has shown incredible IQ yet, but I still stand by my opinion that it is nowhere near a mediocre PS2 game (and yes, that includes your shot).
Give me a freaking break. You're the one with the reading comprehension problem, I didn't even quote your post :lol. I posted in response to the guy who said "The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game." I disagreed and still stand by that.dark10x said:Can you not read? I'm not suggesting that the game looks like a mediocre PS2 game, I'm saying that the image quality reminds me of an older PS2 game. You can have fantastic assets on screen with lousy image quality, you know. I don't think the age of the shots have anything to do with that either.
The guy you quoted was clarifying my earlier post.Phife Dawg said:Give me a freaking break. You're the one with the reading comprehension problem, I didn't even quote your post :lol. I posted in response to the guy who said "The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game." I disagreed and still stand by that.
As you have pointed out yourself, you didn't claim the IQ looked like a mediocre PS2 game. I don't think that was a clarification of what you posted.dark10x said:The guy you quoted was clarifying my earlier post.
Regardless, you responded to his post by posting an 800x600 shot (which most certainly doesn't accruately represent the video output of ANY Wii game).
Why do you keep dodging the fact that you posted a bullshot? Why not just go back, edit your post, apologize for presenting a fraudulent argument, and then continue trying to justify your stance?Phife Dawg said:As you have pointed out yourself, you didn't claim the IQ looked like a mediocre PS2 game. I don't think that was a clarification of what you posted.
Regardless, I said that I stand by my point (that the IQ does not look like from a mediocre PS2 game) even in the light of the shot you have posted.
beef3483 said:There always has to be a graphical debate in every Wii thread. It's like a rule or something.
And it almost always contains these claims:
1. "Graphics rock!"
2. "Graphics suck!"
3. "Looks like a PS2 title."
4. "Should've been on an HD console."
It's incredible formulaic and gets real old after awhile.
Durante said:He's talking about image quality in the non-bullshots, not character design. And I agree. The designs are amazing (and yes, somewhat similar to ES which is unsurprising considering the developer). The technical image quality is more akin to a mediocre PS2 game. Personally I still think it's a shame, I'd rather see the art realized on a more capable platform.
Looks wonderful. Great looking game with impressive lightning.Endless said:
It's gone from "Wii has no good games!" to "I don't want Wii to have good games Im interested in!". Sad . . .thats been the feel for the past few days.Vdragoon said:Don't ppl get banned for going into a wii game thread and saying this should be on x HD console because it will look better? It's getting quite silly and stupid.
No, but you shouldn't try to go to a PS3,360 game thread and say it would work so much better with Wii controls.Vdragoon said:Don't ppl get banned for going into a wii game thread and saying this should be on x HD console because it will look better? It's getting quite silly and stupid.