FightyF said:
6.75 means crap game?
I thought the bet was that the game had to be "shitty"?
If the game isn't shitty, I have to pay $250 to the charity of Dyack's choice.
Amir0x said the game was shitty, based on his own personal right to say that anything is shitty. I wouldn't mind if he said that my game was shitty. It'd mean I made a game.
Denis came to the GAF and said the game was even better than Eternal Darkness and that the masses would agree with him and the GAF would be proven wrong (because apparently we're all a hivemind that follows Amir0x), and gave the GAF permission to set the specific bet terms.
EviLore turned down tag bets as unenforceable, and offered to give $2000 to charity if Too Human scored better than Eternal Darkness (on Metacritic, where it scored 92), but said Denis would have to do the same if it scored less.
Denis turned tail and whined about the 92, suggesting Lair (53) and Haze (55) as better goalposts, and refused the idea of a money bet outright, insisting on a tag bet.
There was no agreement reached on bet terms, but there's obviously a general sense that we'll all laugh at Denis to varying degrees depending on which goalposts Too Human fails to meet. And then Denis said that he was just pulling our legs. Conducting a social experiment. Lying. Trolling.
Even if you agreed to Denis' non-finalized terms (a tag bet on whether or not SK will beat 53-55%, and you may have even kicked in an unmatched offer of your own money) when EviLore didn't approve them, you don't have to pay up because Denis has already chickened out of the deal. If you really feel that you lost and you
want to pay up somehow, you can be a man and do it, but you can't pay to Denis' choice of charities because Denis would have to be a real piece of shit to ask you to go through with it at this point by telling you what his favorite charity happens to be.