-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Glitch in Destiny reveals DLC details and content is partially on Disc
- Thread starter DNAbro
- Start date
Crucible rank 1 is 1500 reputation, rank 2 is 2000 and rank 3 is 2500, for a total of 6000 reputation points. Assuming you're playing on teams that give you a 50/50 win/loss ratio, you get 17.5 crucible reputation points per match, so that would take you about 343 matches to go from rank 0 to rank 3.
However, if you pick up five crucible bounties and clear them at a reasonable speed, let's say in ten matches, you can greatly reduce that number. Each bounty gives an average of 75 reputation, so, completing 5 of them in ten matches would award you an extra 37.5 reputation per match ... so, about 110 matches to go from rank 0 reputation to rank 3 reputation. You could reduce the number of matches even more if you cleared your five bounties in less than 10 matches, but you can usually only pick up five bounties per day.
Keep in mind the handler will sell you armor pieces at Rank 2. You only need Rank 3 for the weapons and the vehicles.
I'm actually serious, yes.
As I said before, the real reward is Crucible marks and Crucible reputation. The rewards on that screen are 100% random, and you'd get them whether your team wins or loses the match.
Not once did I say "your reward is playing the game", I think you've misunderstood me.
That isn't really a reward, it's what you expect to receive for participating, it is essentially the whole point of even joining the crucible.
The entire section is labeled "Activity Rewards", under rewards, and should be based on some type of system that gauges actual contribution, to incentivize people into actually caring.
Honestly the main reason I posted this thread was so that news would gain some traction to see if they would respond. So yeah the places were created but the missions themselves aren't.
Deej if you are reading this, luv yah.
I agree that that would be a nice improvement to the current system. Maybe even base the rewards off of medals you receive? Or the point awards of the medals you receive?
If they want to leave it the way it is they should just state, right on that screen, that the rewards are random and not performance-based.
There's really no need for that, at all.
you know what would work? if your the leading player in your team, you get better chances to get loot, it can stay random but at least there will be some incentive to do good and the higher chance would be a nice touch
cpp_is_king
Member
Yea I know, there's also King's Watch in Old Russia. My point is just that all they've done is built the geometry for the area and made it so you can't enter. King's Watch I believe has some enemies behind a door and a boss. But it could just be some placeholder shit they were using for testing. An area with some enemies plopped into the middle of it does not equal finished content.
Lucent
Member
lol never fails to make me laugh. I honestly rather have devs never mention stuff unless it's very close to release or there is no way they're going to scrap an idea. This crap got Peter Molyneux in trouble. And I don't care what position the guy was in.
Zomba13
Member
I like it when he threw a grenade out as "proof" but decided not to bother in the interest of time.
John Rabbit
Banned
i'm not sure you actually like loot games.