Hero of Legend said:
Nightfire ran at 60fps. Even in four player splitscreen (on Gamecube, anyways).AndyMoogle said:I bet World at War has a lot more going on at once, and it probably has a better framerate too.
I AM JOHN! said:You're talking like Goldeneye did something absolutely incredible that has never been replicated by most other games. It was Quake multiplayer that was great because it was better than any other console game could handle at the time. Aside from that, there is absolutely nothing remarkable about Goldeneye's gameplay unlike Doom and Quake which still kind of hold up. In fact, there's been numerous games since then that have done the exact same thing as what Goldeneye did (Timesplitters, the Conduit, Red Steel) with mixed results. What makes you so convinced this will be any different aside from the fact that it's raping Goldeneye's corpse and will probably take its levels?
It is the exact mixture of nostalgia and reliable gameplay coupled with simplicity which will allow this game to be good in the eyes of those who would love an online remake. That's all I'm saying. And I'm purchasing it too, and I haven't purchased a bond game since it (unless you count perfect dark).I AM JOHN! said:You're talking like Goldeneye did something absolutely incredible that has never been replicated by most other games. It was Quake multiplayer that was great because it was better than any other console game could handle at the time. Aside from that, there is absolutely nothing remarkable about Goldeneye's gameplay unlike Doom and Quake which still kind of hold up. In fact, there's been numerous games since then that have done the exact same thing as what Goldeneye did (Timesplitters, the Conduit, Red Steel) with mixed results. What makes you so convinced this will be any different aside from the fact that it's raping Goldeneye's corpse and will probably take its levels?
I AM JOHN! said:You're talking like Goldeneye did something absolutely incredible that has never been replicated by most other games. It was Quake multiplayer that was great because it was better than any other console game could handle at the time. Aside from that, there is absolutely nothing remarkable about Goldeneye's gameplay unlike Doom and Quake which still kind of hold up. In fact, there's been numerous games since then that have done the exact same thing as what Goldeneye did (Timesplitters, the Conduit, Red Steel) with mixed results. What makes you so convinced this will be any different aside from the fact that it's raping Goldeneye's corpse and will probably take its levels?
edible_candle said:Nightfire ran at 60fps. Even in four player splitscreen (on Gamecube, anyways).
I don't believe this necessarily, but I do believe that Goldeneye Wii will be fun. Fun enough to purchase. That's all I'm saying.Amir0x said:Let them have their imagined golden cow. Their memories are all they have. Don't shatter their illusions about how Goldeneye can hold up against any modern FPS.
hokahey said:LMAO at the fanboy butt-hurt because Wii exclusive. This is a remake of a previous Nintendo exclusive. Makes a lot of sense to me.
Quake is a PC game. Who the hell gets together and plays 4-player computer games? Not me. Neither did any of my friends at that time. So for us it was the first real multiplayer FPS experience.I AM JOHN! said:You're talking like Goldeneye did something absolutely incredible that has never been replicated by most other games. It was Quake multiplayer that was great because it was better than any other console game could handle at the time. Aside from that, there is absolutely nothing remarkable about Goldeneye's gameplay unlike Doom and Quake which still kind of hold up. In fact, there's been numerous games since then that have done the exact same thing as what Goldeneye did (Timesplitters, the Conduit, Red Steel) with mixed results. What makes you so convinced this will be any different aside from the fact that it's raping Goldeneye's corpse and will probably take its levels?
Yes they did?Hero of Legend said:
that seems to be the case with a lot of shooters these days. :lolMariah Carey said:Goldeneye was pretty much the beginning and the end of my flirtation with first person shooters. I might give this a look if it turns out they've been able to recapture the magic, so to speak.
Oh, and what's this talk like split-screen is a thing of the past? Can you seriously not play 4 players on one TV in most of these games these days?
Mafro said:Yes they did?
Diablos54 said:It's only page 2 and I'm sick of this shit.
You know that many of the things in that post were in PD but not Goldeneye, right (and that PD hasn't really held up either, while we're at it)?evangd007 said:I'd go over the finer points of Goldeneye and its successor Perfect Dark, but EatChildren did it for me in the previous thread. Its astonishing the things it did that have not been replicated in subsequent shooters. If Goldeneye Wii matches even half that it'd be worth it.
So how will this be any different from Goldeneye: Rogue Agent (which I think was also made a Eurocom joint)?GregLombardi said:It is the exact mixture of nostalgia and reliable gameplay coupled with simplicity which will allow this game to be good in the eyes of those who would love an online remake. That's all I'm saying. And I'm purchasing it too, and I haven't purchased a bond game since it (unless you count perfect dark).
Uh... a lot of people? That's how I first learned to play Counter-Strike, Medal of Honor: AA, Battlefield and all the post-Goldeneye games that really got me into first-person shooters.HAL_Laboratory said:Quake is a PC game. Who the hell gets together and plays 4-player computer games? Not me. Neither did any of my friends at that time. So for us it was the first real multiplayer FPS experience.
Hero of Legend said:
MisterHero said:that seems to be the case with a lot of shooters these days. :lol
what's even more amazing is that with more screen space and HD definition, it was determined a lot of games didn't need a split-screen mode :lol
Penguin said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7q9adDbeKQ
I assume it looks official enough, hopefully its not a hoax.
i cut my teeth on pc fps games and i liked goldeneyeI AM JOHN! said:Uh... a lot of people? That's how I first learned to play Battlefield and Counter-Strike and all the post-Goldeneye games that really got me into first-person shooters.
Just because you're mostly a console-only gamer doesn't mean we all are.
HAL_Laboratory said:Quake is a PC game. Who the hell gets together and plays 4-player computer games? Not me. Neither did any of my friends at that time. So for us it was the first real multiplayer FPS experience.
That wasn't what I was saying. I, too, loved Goldeneye at the time, but the notion that only weirdos get together with a bunch of PCs and do LAN is just fucking ridiculous, regardless of whether or not you think Goldeneye holds up (which I obviously don't).EmCeeGramr said:i cut my teeth on pc fps games and i liked goldeneye
jufonuk said:Trailer being taken down confirms this??
also lets hope this is like what they did in COD Reflex and a work in progress and the GFX tarted up a bit, still the explosions looked nice in this game so did some of the texture, this looks awesome (people must have short memories as this did not look anything like the N64 version to me), I hope they can nail the controls and the story in single player is still awesome.
Hero of Legend said:
evangd007 said:Made by Eurocom, not Treyarch.