Wha? are you reading the reviews?NeoUltima said:Wow, shame to hear about shitty multiplayer. No matchmaking and shitty netcode :/
Wha? are you reading the reviews?NeoUltima said:Wow, shame to hear about shitty multiplayer. No matchmaking and shitty netcode :/
The IGN reviewer barely played the game, and hardly looked through the features. It's pretty evident when he mentioned "no upgrade option for brakes" when GAF has proven that brake upgrades are on select vehicles.Yoboman said:It seems like a lot of these flaws are just being blown out of proportion and reviewers are losing site of the actual product
I mean they seem more concerned with the menu set up than the actual gameplay
well, it's kind of the reviewer's problem with sims, I guess.Yoboman said:It seems like a lot of these flaws are just being blown out of proportion and reviewers are losing site of the actual product
I mean they seem more concerned with the menu set up than the actual gameplay
Keep in mind though, that this is the first fully fledged Gran Turismo that has online play, and maybe it shows. The game isn't even out everywhere in the world yet. It'll go through it's early teething problems, just like any other game would.hatchx said:Hearing how piss-poor the online implementation is a pretty big disappointment for me. It's not the scores that are surprising, but some of the odd design choices. I was on the fence about this one but I think I'll pass in favor of something else.
Well, not upgrades per say, but they are adjustable on Karts and stuff (Bias, etc). It's just you can't buy "Racing" or "Sports" packages like we're used to in GT and other games.expy said:The IGN reviewer barely played the game, and hardly looked through the features. It's pretty evident when he mentioned "no upgrade option for brakes" when GAF has proven that brake upgrades are on select vehicles.
Yoboman said:It seems like a lot of these flaws are just being blown out of proportion and reviewers are losing site of the actual product
I mean they seem more concerned with the menu set up than the actual gameplay
I didn't say that, I said that reviewers are losing perspective.HK-47 said:Yeah fuck those things that actually let you get the playing and customizing part. They arent that important.
CrushDance said:8 and 9 are bad scores? The game isn't polished enough for 10 across the board. That seems to be the single big complaint.
The question is, are YOU?Loudninja said:Wha? are you reading the reviews?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-11-24-gran-turismo-5-review?page=3eurogamer said:As a public game, though, GT5 needs a lot of work. There's no matchmaking at all, so you have to browse a list of rooms and pick one, or enter an alphanumeric code, as if you're playing a PC game and it's 1999. The netcode is unstable; after a long pause I started one race alone on the grid, with the rest of the field halfway around the track already.
Eurogamer review, yeah.Loudninja said:Wha? are you reading the reviews?
Bossman said:8 and 9 are bad scores for hugely hyped console exclusives that have been under development for years.
Well I'd rather the truth than another GTA4.Bossman said:8 and 9 are bad scores for hugely hyped console exclusives that have been under development for years.
adelante said:
http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2010/11/24/review-gran-turismo-5/Online racing is youll be glad to know, lag free. In fact, its a fussless experience, a breeze to set up, offers the same great sense of speed of single player and is slick enough to warrant some serious investment down the line. Gran Turismo 5 goes beyond just racing, though, with a Facebook-like messageboard (albeit with Twitter like 140 character limits), a log of all your achievements, a section for email and another for gifts, which is where youll be notified if someone has sent you a car ticket, or a tuning part or a paint colour. Its a whole new social angle for the series and its great to see it so well integrated into the game, even if at the time of writing the server seemed to be really struggling with any updates.
Yoboman said:I didn't say that, I said that reviewers are losing perspective.
Nirolak said:
adelante said:
Lol my point is that you should've asked which review he's read, instead of assuming he read none and just pulled that fact out of his own ass. Nice try.Loudninja said:
Let me tell you a little secret: Perfectionists are rarely satisfied with what they produce. Even if it's as close to perfection as possible. Believe me, I'm one of them. It's a sad existence.Razgreez said:Reading about all the glaring bumps and niggles with this game highlighted in the reviews i honestly feel KY is going look back on it as his worst entry to the GT franchise
http://www.destructoid.com/review-gran-turismo-5-188383.phtmlOnline racing makes its series debut with GT5. There's a good bit of community features to be explored within the online mode beyond the up to 16-player races it provides. Creating or joining online rooms is easy, as is jumping into a race. Rooms feature full chat, and you can do this while watching as a spectator. You can feel free to jump into a room's track at any time to do time trials, and the game will let you know when there's a race starting. When the race does start, you'll automatically be whisked away to the starting line from your time trials. While the selection of online opponents was limited on these pre-release days, every match I was in worked beautifully. Polyphony Digital has put together a really polished, attractive online experience, and it comes complete with mail, messaging, and even your own lounge. There's plenty of room for online to flourish once the game gets in the hands of racing fans.
Dreams-Visions said:scores won't deter the dedicated. but I'm sure PD and those on the fence will be disappointed.
these scores are middle-of-the-road for premiere racing games this gen. a bitter pill for those waiting 6 years and expecting nothing less than near- universal acclaim in the 90%+ range.
mr stroke said:+1
For someone like my self(casual racing fan who only has time to play one racer this year) these scores are disappointing after the years it took to develop this game. May end up picking up NFS instead.
I assume he is. Not everyone is sold purely on brand name. Review scores matter to those who aren't hardcore.Kuran said:Are you kidding me?
TruePrime said:It maybe me, but I don't care what it is, the idea of saying an 8 or even more so a fucking Nine is bad in any form is crazy talk to me.
mr stroke said:+1
For someone like my self(casual racing fan who only has time to play one racer this year) these scores are disappointing after the years it took to develop this game. May end up picking up NFS instead.
:lol :lol :lolmr stroke said:+1
For someone like my self(casual racing fan who only has time to play one racer this year) these scores are disappointing after the years it took to develop this game. May end up picking up NFS instead.
Oh dangmr stroke said:+1
For someone like my self(casual racing fan who only has time to play one racer this year) these scores are disappointing after the years it took to develop this game. May end up picking up NFS instead.
Most of the US is asleep.i_am_ben said:this thread is behaving far too rational at the moment.
Linconan said:(General)
Even though this'll probably fall on def ears.
And/or care.
Reviews don't make the game, Good, Bad, and the Ugly.
People need to play it for themselves whether i'd be renting or buying, to make up their own mind if they're interested in this genre or not.
Sadly though, we're in the day n age where people think Reviewers are the gaming gods and they know best :lol
Me, I like making up my own mind. You?
From 7 to 10, tells you something though.
People have different 'opinions', and thats all.
*burp..
There's my DrPhil comment.
marc^o^ said:I'm trying to understand how the PHENOMENAL game I've been playing these last 4 days can get 8/10 scores from gamers. I mean, I could mentaly accept my mom not to see the quality difference between this and other racing games, but come on, journalists? I can't find any explanation, it's as if Half Life 2 or Mario Galaxy 2 received such scores in their time. Pinacle of the genre: 8/10. Riiiight.
rational people are posting right now.i_am_ben said:this thread is behaving far too rational at the moment.
Haha you bet your ass. And not without reason, they really hit the spot when FM3 came out. No question about it.HK-47 said:Turn 10 must be feeling smug right now.
HK-47 said:Turn 10 must be feeling smug right now.
About what a handful of scores?HK-47 said:Turn 10 must be feeling smug right now.
eeeeeeh I dunno about that.wmat said:Haha you bet your ass. And not without reason, they really hit the spot when FM3 came out. No question about it.
Seems like GT5 is having a harder time landing overall, but for the hardcore simmers, which essentially are the people PD are talking to, this game should be heaven.
well...it's the only measuring stick used to determine what games may be better than others. and it's kinda more than a handful. Almost all of the biggies have spoken.Loudninja said:About what a handful of scores?
Kuran said:Are you kidding me?