Why are you asking if "I honestly believe that"? Have I said anything that suggested that I did? Are you conflating me with someone else? We NeoGAF feminists aren't a monolithic entities, you know.
It'd be cool if you were engaging in a real discussion by addressing what is actually being said and trying to understand where we're coming from when we find rampant objectification of female characters as problematic. But I can tell that this is of no interest to you. You'd rather build up strawmen because that's easier to take down, and go off about bizarre tangents about men's depression and various social issues that I never once brought up. I am sick at the moment and I have no energy to waste on refuting a bunch of fallacies, so, whatever, have your little victory.
Where did I say that objectification of female characters to be a non-issue? Of course your free to take offense to it and find it problematic. Hell I personally think Quiet's design is pretty stupid, but it doesn't mean I think it and sexualization within our media and culture is contributing to some made up notion that it's leading to sexual assault, rape, harassment, etc. Or that sexualization within our media is contributing to a culture that is less aware or understanding of such issues. I think that belief is completely absurd, and studies have shown that to not at all be the case. In fact our society is more aware, intolerant, openly discusses, and is safer than it's ever been when regarding these issues, despite the increase of sexualization within our media and culture.