AuthenticM
Member
Not offensive at all.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but I personally don't give a shit about men walking around like this.
Not offensive at all.
Kojima's a big fan of this girl (SSSniperwolf)
He often retweets her tweets like a school boy.
]Meanwhile, in the same universe, the girls are brought out in a very different way. From the moment they're introduced, they're sexualized, and anything else they can do is secondary. Paz seems to exist solely for some creepy loli complex shit, and the feature to look through her clothes during cutscenes absolutely has no equal with MGS men. Or they can be like the bosses in MGS4, where they start as things that you're not even sure are human, and then the last impression they leave is as a pointlessly sexualized woman writhing around on the floor. And now we have a character who, even before the game is out, is being introduced to the public as an ass in underwear and ratty stockings on twitter. What does she even do, what is she about? I'm not even sure if that's important, because Kojima himself feels the need to tell us, before anything else, that she needs to be more erotic. Does this sound like an interesting character to you so far? It sure doesn't to me.
Which brings us back to the part where supposed feminists want to protect the helpless cosplayers. And yes, it says a lot about how men want women to dress, they're sexually active males of course they'd want that. So you're expecting males to feel guilty because they want to see semi naked women and women to feel degraded because they, as consenting and self-aware adults, decided to dress in a way very attractive to men.
And all that guilt and presumed degradation for something as natural as sexual attraction. Puritanism is really fucked up.
Cortana doesn't even have a butt?
Been speculated to hell and back for months now, but outside of the actual actress saying there is a reason for the way she looks we have this footage from the trailer to show her skin does have supernatural powers.
No confirmation on whether she can cover her whole body
Not offensive at all.
So basically her skin was the inspiration for the development of the OctoCamo?
Awesome Twist confirmed!
David probably thinks the same about Cortana.
There's nothing wrong with him having an opinion.
I wonder what today's reaction would be to the golden shower in MGS2 if Raiden was a girl.
Obviously Stefanie Joosten is ok with it...
no need to act overprotective.
So what? What's the problem in that at all? She likes his characters enough to cosplay as them and Kojima tweets it...
What person out there wouldn't be honored by this?
I do not understand this mentality, nor some of the supporters of the original post. I do not understand how this is controversial. I can't even begin to fathom how this thread has lasted this long.
So it would have been OK for a MGS dev to tweet about how the new Cortana was designed by sexist man babies?
He showed incredible cowardice by removing his credentials from his Twitter handle. Since he didn't completely fly off the handle he wont get fired. If anything were to happen, it would be from him falling on his own sword and taking himself out of the equation,
So it would have been OK for a MGS dev to tweet about how the new Cortana was designed by sexist man babies?
I think she just has the same power "The End" had. His skin went stripey black looking from time to time for his power
Also her design may be a bit over the top but what's more interesting to me at this point is how the character acts in game. If she's going around flaunting her butt at guys to grab attention or seducing people with ehr looks then it's a big problem. But if she's actualyl a hardened badass she could actually be a good character. Like her personality could contrast her beauty or something like that. SOrt of like the beuaty and beast corps
So it would have been OK for a MGS dev to tweet about how the new Cortana was designed by sexist man babies?
No! She's being exploited! White knight powers activate!
For fuck's sake, now you want a dev fired for voicing an inoffensive personal opinion? Ever wonder why developers rarely say a word beyond those boring PR approved scripts?
Yes, but bear with me for a second.
If 30000 people feel positive about a design and 3000 people feel negative, the voices of negativity will be heard enough despite being a small percentage. Also, those who received the design as good or simply didn't have a problem will most likely adapt to the redesign, making them more tolerant to changes than the "feedback" crowd.
So after all, intolerant people force their views on tolerant people.
Once again: won't somebody pleaaase think of the poor oppressed straight males? My heart bleeds for them.Because it's only women that have to compete with warped concepts of femininity in media. Men don't have to compete with warped concepts of masculinity in media.
Because it's impossible to both be a sex-positive feminist and still have a problem with the overly abundant of objectifying and sexualizing of female characters in gaming, right? Mutually exclusive and all that? Give me a break.You've just described the difference between Sex-Positive Feminism and the other kind which people like the Tropes vs Women person subscribe to.
And here we go again. Those feminists are really just prudes deep down, amirite?You hit the nail in the head. It's no coincidence that this obnoxious version of feminism according to which most things sexual are also sexist is prevalent in USA. It's the result of puritanism and feminism intertwined into a farcical ideology that is against any progress women have made in western society.
....WatIt's basically like calling Joss Whedon or Quentin Tarantino misogynists.
Why would having a "story reason" for her being half-naked change anything? "mega lulz" indeed. Once again, if I write a story with a 12 year old loli having sex with a 45 year old man, and tell you that the little girl is actually an immortal 200 years old elf, does that make it not creepy because "it's justified in the story"? -_-No! She's being exploited! White knight powers activate!
Also mega lulz if she does end up having some sort of supernatural skin-based ability like photosynthesis or camouflage. That means that there will actually be a legit reason for her to be dressed like that, and Cortana still has no reason for being naked. Except to attract the 13 year old COD fanbase.
Maybe but my overall point, to counter Opiate's, is that video games are too diverse in 2013 to be labeled one way or the other.It's pretty sad if those are the best examples there are of video games as art.
Cortana is how a computer would design a female, MGSV's "erotic" female is how Kojima would design a female - for a Kojima universe.
I kind of agree with both in certain ways..
Anyway, my guess is that people who finds Cortana's sexiness in the same ballpark would probably get an erection from looking at a womans bike.
that's a condescending statement
Once again: won't somebody pleaaase think of the poor oppressed straight males? My heart bleeds for them.
Because it's impossible to both be a sex-positive feminist and still have a problem with the overly abundant of objectifying and sexualizing of female characters in gaming, right? Mutually exclusive and all that? Give me a break.
And here we go again. Those feminists are really just prudes deep down, amirite?
So basically her skin was the inspiration for the development of the OctoCamo?
Awesome Twist confirmed!
Yes, here we go again ignoring that the so called feminists are promoting puritanism through their supposed activism. Like them using moronic terms like objectification for anything involving sexual attraction in the age where my girlfriend was pausing True Blood to see Skarsgard's dick. OMG objectification! Or isn't it because only males can do it? This shit is why this kind of puritanical feminists are considered a joke especially by progressive societies.
Yes, I'm sure the original reason as to why Bungie designed Cortana to be 'naked' was to attract the non-existent 13 year old CoD fanbase.No! She's being exploited! White knight powers activate!
Also mega lulz if she does end up having some sort of supernatural skin-based ability like photosynthesis or camouflage. That means that there will actually be a legit reason for her to be dressed like that, and Cortana still has no reason for being naked. Except to attract the 13 year old COD fanbase.
Why does simply having an attractive character in a work of fiction need to be justified?Having an attractive character is fine (if adequately justified), having one for the purpose of just pleasing the male audience, while wanting the 'expense' to be from female cosplayers could be taken to sexual objectification, of the character and of those women.
Put simply.
That's because Halo is a MS game, if it was a Sony game he wouldn't have posted that.
It's amazing how some people try to downplay the sexualized nature of Cortana.
Why does simply having an attractive character in a work of fiction need to be justified?
Seriously, our reactions to these alleged controversies are always more embarrassing and revealing than the "controversies" themselves.
Prosecution complex much? Were you not around when GoW:A was released and what sessler and many have argued about on the forums? Or the GoW games in general?
Some people...
However what I am not so fond off, is having a character purely designed on the basis of wanting to make female cosplayers dress in such a particular slimpy manner.
I like both designs. I think there's room for many different kinds of characters in the video game industry. Enjoy Ellie and Alex while I enjoy Bayonetta.Personally I think both designs, Cortana and Quiet(?) have become stupidly oversexualized and cringeworthy. Makes me sick. I'm a fan of games like TLOU, where they designed strong female characters that didn't need their boobs and asses hanging out to play a good role in the game.
Designing a character to encourage cosplayers to dress like the character sounds like he's fashioning it after their sensibilities rather than wanting to see half naked fans for his own pleasure. Just my opinion.
Been speculated to hell and back for months now, but outside of the actual actress saying there is a reason for the way she looks we have this footage from the trailer to show her skin does have supernatural powers.
No confirmation on whether she can cover her whole body
I don't think it's a stretch to assume he thinks cosplayers would be attracted to an all round sexy/appealing design than lsomething neutral or plain.Perhaps...But like I said, when he posts a picture of a lovely bottom and states "something like this"
I find it quite easy to interpret that as designing a character to please the male audience at the wanted expense of females cosplayers.
I mean, if someone raised legitimate concern about how females are portrayed by raising such points I'd find it sincerely hard to refute.
It's a tough subject, and believe it or not, I am torn on the subject...
I just believe the honourable opposition should not be discarded.
I don't think it's a stretch to assume he thinks cosplayers would be attracted to an all round sexy/appealing design than lsomething neutral or plain.
I don't personally like the design or kojimas statements to be honest. It's great these issues are being discussed. I just don't like the attacks/assumptions on his character.
Should I also learn to keep my head down?
Designing a character to encourage cosplayers to dress like the character sounds like he's fashioning it after their sensibilities rather than wanting to see half naked fans for his own pleasure. Just my opinion.
I tried to touch on this much earlier in the thread, but this gets to the fact that I think it's a complex issue to tackle. Is it sexist to have such a motivation if it leads to women voluntarily cosplaying as the character? I don't know. On the one hand, it doesn't behoove us to look down on a woman that likes the attire or feels empowered by looking sexy, because it might come across as condescending to appear to be trying to save women from themselves. But on the other, one shouldn't discount a more self-interested motive. Arguably, women may like feeling sexy for their own benefit, and there's nothing wrong with that. Maybe some enjoy having men notice that they are sexy, and there's nothing wrong with that either. But if my prime motivation in an outfit design is "I want to see sexy women dressed like this," I think it's somewhat difficult to argue that the intent is purely empathetic while ignoring completely a manipulative motive perhaps existing.
I skipped responding to that for a reason. Cause it's just using subjectivety as an excuse. Yes, we react to a naked man differently than we do a naked woman. But that does not make the two inequal in art.