Then again I guess building operating systems is not really Microsoft's main business, so we can't trust them to have a non-idiotic architecture.
Sarcasm?
Then again I guess building operating systems is not really Microsoft's main business, so we can't trust them to have a non-idiotic architecture.
Interesting...do you think they'd do that? Make Gold free? I don't think they'd make gold free, rather they'd bump up the benefits of Silver. Silver members get online MP access, Netflix, Hulu +, Youtube, etc., and then make Gold have some sort of features that made it a must-have. Maybe something similar to PS +?
Interesting...do you think they'd do that? Make Gold free? I don't think they'd make gold free, rather they'd bump up the benefits of Silver. Silver members get online MP access, Netflix, Hulu +, Youtube, etc., and then make Gold have some sort of features that made it a must-have. Maybe something similar to PS +?
thats the thing, and i think i recall hearing rumors stating this, that gold would be the new silver (free) and allow access to online gaming and some other things with a new tier ("diamond"?) that gave additional benefits/services. kind of like psn.
Semantics? I don't think I've ever heard someone say they own the entire Netflix library while they're subscribed, the same applies here.
thats the thing, and i think i recall hearing rumors stating this, that gold would be the new silver (free) and allow access to online gaming and some other things with a new tier ("diamond"?) that gave additional benefits/services. kind of like psn.
Times have changed. The Wii U is $300/$350.
LOL. Microsoft doesn't give shit free, they shaft you more over time. Chances are, I would bet there will be no 'Silver.' Wouldn't surprise me if they stuffed achievements and other things behind the gated wall of Live.
Actually MS gives services and software free all the time. For example their low tier development tools are free. They got in trouble with the justice department for giving IE for free while there competitors was charging for browsers...
I think he's talking about stuff for consumers. And it's funny you should mention IE, since even THAT is behind the Live pay wall. lol
I just don't understand why anyone would pay to rent games that they don't get to pick themselves. It is like Netflix picking my movies for me.
On the Xbox...not on Windows. Unless you count the Windows OS as a "pay wall."
Ehhh.. Having mixed feelings about the price tag. I buy every console at launch, yes paid $600 for PS3, but after the launches of the previous generation - faulty systems, shitty launch window games, and long game droughts, I just don't think I have the stomach to spend more than $400 for a game console anymore.
I really hope they have a Kinect-les sku for 400$, but all signs are pointing to hell no. With that said, I think the PS4 is going to be 500$ as well, so it's really going to be an expensive holiday either way I go, most likely.
That's not going to happen. If the original Kinect was a meager success then they would have offered Durango models with or without Kinect 2.0. But the original Kinect was a moneymaker for them and they'll hitch their cart to that horse from the very start.
You realize multimedia functions don't really require that much RAM right? You can still use an original Xbox with XBMC as a very competent HTPC to this day...
As I expected those RAM numbers were out of someone's ass. Why the fuck would you even reserve fixed amounts like that when you got an unified memory pool and can just allocate it dynamically according to what the system needs?
Then again I guess building operating systems is not really Microsoft's main business, so we can't trust them to have a non-idiotic architecture.
That's why I said "all signs point to hell no."
--------------------------------------------------------
Just thinking, Microsoft is really, really, really gong to have to do something big. Sony already has 4 big exclusives coming out at launch, or launch window; Killzone: SF, Knack, DriveClub, and infamous: SS. The last one is likely the only that doesn't come out on launch day.
The reason Kinect sold, the reason that people bought the Xbox 360 as a entertainment box, etc., was likely due in part to how cheap the 360 became. The games for the Kinect weren't great, but they were broad enough to appeal to the mass audience, and the thing caught on fast.
This thing is going to be 500$, maybe 400$ at the very, very least. The Innovator and Early adopters are usually gaming enthusiasts. A small segment of them are pure tech enthusiasts. How the hell is Microsoft going to go head-to-head with Sony if they don't bring something for those early adopters and get the console to snowball into the mass market when things cool down and the consoles aren't "new" anymore? They have to be planning something. There's no chance in hell they'd walk in like lambs to slaughter this holiday.
So what the hell do they have planned that's going to get people to buy it? Is it a new IP? Do the still think a new Halo, Gears, or Forza could do it? Do they think those families that bought a Kinect are going to dump 500 bones for new tech? I just can't believe Microsoft would go into this without something big planned.
Just thinking, Microsoft is really, really, really gong to have to do something big. Sony already has 4 big exclusives coming out at launch, or launch window; Killzone: SF, Knack, DriveClub, and infamous: SS. The last one is likely the only that doesn't come out on launch day.
We have no idea when these games are actually coming out. Some could easily slip a year or more (Knack strikes me that way for sure). Shadowfall will surely make launch imo.
Killzone and Infamous only sell "ok". They're not exactly monsters. The other two, Joe Blow has never heard of.
We have no idea when these games are actually coming out. Some could easily slip a year or more (Knack strikes me that way for sure). Shadowfall will surely make launch imo.
Killzone and Infamous only sell "ok". They're not exactly monsters. The other two, Joe Blow has never heard of.
It makes zero sense to release your big guns on launch day because third party titles will carry your launch for you. That's one reason why Santa Monica, Naughty Dog, and Polyphony were not at the PS4 unveiling.
That is why we need a Perfect Dark 2. MONEY!Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
That is why we need a Perfect Dark 2. MONEY!
Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
Lol. If Alan Wake is a big game, what is Killzone then? Superbig?
Alan Wake 2 is big but Killzone & Infamous is not?
Edit: beaten
Lol. If Alan Wake is a big game, what is Killzone then? Superbig?
lol I really doubt this.
People are forgetting about that rumour where the subsidised Xbox won't work without live
So why aren't these tales from the ass? The price already gives it away, pricing is simply not decided at this point. If PS4 is 399 there is no way 720 will be 499. With specs being 33% worse there is no way they can sell against a cheaper PS4 AND for all wie know these aren't two super expensive power consoles, they should not exceed 300 in raw production costs.
Launch date is just as fishy. It's just the typical "they always launched in november".
The rest is just plain copy & pasting existing rumours which doesn't exactly inspire confidence in them. And he's bad at that as well, wie know by now that the always online rumours is based on the devkit requirement to always be connected to the Internet. But that is purely for protection of those devkits after the attempted sale of one on eBay.
For me, 2005.when is the last time you guys used a console that had no ethernet cable plugged into it ?
I'm talking more from personal perspective.
Right now only God of War could make me buy a PS4 day one, but that's not happening so I'll wait till better games come.
Ditto for Xbox. Given halo 4 and gears judgment just came out, only Alan Wake 2 or Crackdown 3 could pry my wallet open.
So why aren't these tales from the ass? The price already gives it away, pricing is simply not decided at this point. If PS4 is 399 there is no way 720 will be 499. With specs being 33% worse there is no way they can sell against a cheaper PS4 AND for all wie know these aren't two super expensive power consoles, they should not exceed 300 in raw production costs.
Launch date is just as fishy. It's just the typical "they always launched in november".
The rest is just plain copy & pasting existing rumours which doesn't exactly inspire confidence in them. And he's bad at that as well, wie know by now that the always online rumours is based on the devkit requirement to always be connected to the Internet. But that is purely for protection of those devkits after the attempted sale of one on eBay.
Inflation. The precedent was already set with the current generation. MS and Sony are still selling bundles @ $299. I don't think either of them are going to make the mistake of pricing themselves out of the market, but if you think that either of thse machines will be sold at the same price of the Wii U, then you're kidding yourself. They will both have hardware that will be far more capable and will be bundled with accessories (Kinect, PS Eye, Bt headset, etc). The days of selling loss leading hardware are long gone.That really isn't the same thing at all. And even so, would it be acceptable? Explain to me how and why times have changed. Nintendo builds a system to make a profit from the very start. Sony doesn't, and neither has MS. If the Vita taught people anything, it's that using off the shelf hardware can translate into a more affordable system for the consumer. It looks like Microsoft is taking that money saved and keeping it for themselves unless there's some ridiculously expensive hardware in it that we don't know about. Anyone who thinks the BOM based on the current specs (including Kinect 2) is over $400 - $500 is kidding themselves.
The cost to build these systems will come down dramatically in the next couple of years. Selling at anything over $399 would be a huge mistake, even when it means taking a small loss from the beginning.
So why aren't these tales from the ass? The price already gives it away, pricing is simply not decided at this point. If PS4 is 399 there is no way 720 will be 499. With specs being 33% worse there is no way they can sell against a cheaper PS4 AND for all wie know these aren't two super expensive power consoles, they should not exceed 300 in raw production costs.
Launch date is just as fishy. It's just the typical "they always launched in november".
The rest is just plain copy & pasting existing rumours which doesn't exactly inspire confidence in them. And he's bad at that as well, wie know by now that the always online rumours is based on the devkit requirement to always be connected to the Internet. But that is purely for protection of those devkits after the attempted sale of one on eBay.
He's no pastebin. Paul Thurrott is the real McCoy when it comes to Microsoft related rumors.
Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
.Joke right?
The Xbox brand exists because of Halo.
Mario 64?
WiiSports?
No, you need the big game(s) right from the start. That's why I won't be bothering to buy neither the PS4 or new Xbox at launch.
So far, neither has a game that is stealing the money from my wallet.
Now, if Alan Wake 2 is announced. Different ball game.
But Knack, Killzone, Infamous and Drive Club? At least the PS2 had Tekken Tag.
when is the last time you guys used a console that had no ethernet cable plugged into it ?
Perhaps, times have changed such that the bolded is no longer the case; i.e. perhaps Entertainment & Devices has been told that they must profit from the start.Explain to me how and why times have changed. Nintendo builds a system to make a profit from the very start. Sony doesn't, and neither has MS.
when is the last time you guys used a console that had no ethernet cable plugged into it ?
So why aren't these tales from the ass? The price already gives it away, pricing is simply not decided at this point. If PS4 is 399 there is no way 720 will be 499. With specs being 33% worse there is no way they can sell against a cheaper PS4 AND for all wie know these aren't two super expensive power consoles, they should not exceed 300 in raw production costs.
That is why we need a Perfect Dark 2. MONEY!