That's what gloves with capacitive finger tips are for.
The other thing that seems like a huge pain in the ass is having to type your password into every app that you use Touch ID for now, like banking. Hope they are all ready to hop on the Face ID bandwagon quickly
By accounts so far, FaceID sounds more reliable than TouchID. It detects a 3D image of your face, so unless someone has sculpted a true-to-life bust you shouldn't need to worry. iOS 11 is also coding in a biometric lock, so you can disable FaceID at will if you feel it will compromise your security. Of course, our understanding of all this may change as we learn more.If someone was going to target me to gain access into my phone, creating a facsimile or printout of my face is a lot easier than going through the effort to get my fingerprint and replicate it on the necessary surface to fool the scanner.
Maybe Apple's figured out a way that those exploits aren't a problem on the iPhone and will tout them, I dunno. I'm just going off of existing tech in phones and how it's... got its limitations.
(It also suggests a weaker security implementation if you're detained by the police, although that may just be a paranoid/niche concern, especially since court precedent is that forcing you to use your finger doesn't run afoul of US constitutional protections versus divulging your passcode.)
Define "fiasco"?
If someone was going to target me to gain access into my phone, creating a facsimile or printout of my face is a lot easier than going through the effort to get my fingerprint and replicate it on the necessary surface to fool the scanner.
240fps is for slow motion, not real time playback.
ah whoops, figured the high refresh rate screens would had come to the note line as well. Now I'm imaging Apple using that as one of the iPhone 10th Anniversary Edition selling pointsI think he means slow-mo recording at 240fps, not screen refresh rate
If that becomes true then it would be pretty great...although that means that the only way to unlock your phone when it's lying on a table is either with a passcode or by picking it up and putting it back down...
We'll have to see how it works in the real world but the better-sourced rumors say it's exactly the opposite, lower false-positive rate than Touch ID.
Abso-fucking-lutely.Would it worth it to switch from a S8+? 🤔🤔🤔
I admittedly have zero clue on how the technology works, but I'm a bit skeptical of that claim.
Facial appearances change literally every single day. Men grow facial hair (beards, staches, goatees) which could potentially make it harder to detect their jaw and cheeks etc. Women cake their face with tons of makeup daily and I would think applying eye shadow and lipstick makes it harder to detect the true shape of their eyes and lips. Simply wearing sunglasses on a sunny day seems like it'd remove a lot of data points (eyes and brows) used for facial scanning. Then there's smaller cosmetic stuff like nose and lip rings etc. Or even stuff like acne breakouts.
I'm sure that Apple accounted for most if not all of those scenarios. But it just seems like there's a LOT more ways facial scanning can potentially get confused versus a fingerprint scanner. Again though, I have no clue on how this works, so I may be wildly off base here. Looking forward to the demo on Tuesday and seeing people test it.
I wonder what identical twins are thinking about this, especially the ones that publicly would say they trust their sibling but secretly wouldnt want their sibling to use their phone. Hey bro whyd you turn off FaceID?
Abso-fucking-lutely.
Windows Hello can distinguish between twins, this totally should
That's just the writer's own conjecture, dude. There was evidence that Apple Pay worked with Face ID back with the HomePod leak, and that was the first real confirmation that Face ID was even a thing.
I'd imagine that's really easy to transition over since they just pass the message to display in the prompt to the Touch ID API and wait for the Secure Enclave to pass an authorisation back to the app. Just substitute the Touch ID API with a new API that prompt for either depending on the device and viola.The other thing that seems like a huge pain in the ass is having to type your password into every app that you use Touch ID for now, like banking. Hope they are all ready to hop on the Face ID bandwagon quickly
Yeah, I hope Intel's upped their game while Apple and Qualcomm duke it out in the courts.new phones have intel modems? oh lord
I somehow seriously doubt Apple is gonna replace Touch ID with a Face ID implementation that can be fooled by a printout. I also wouldn't rely on the limitations of existing tech by other vendors as a guide for what Apple potentially has in store.If someone was going to target me to gain access into my phone, creating a facsimile or printout of my face is a lot easier than going through the effort to get my fingerprint and replicate it on the necessary surface to fool the scanner.
Maybe Apple's figured out a way that those exploits aren't a problem on the iPhone and will tout them, I dunno. I'm just going off of existing tech in phones and how it's... got its limitations.
Maybe theyll do Apple Pay like the Apple Watch does? Double tap the pow....side button to enable it, and the phone is always pre-authorised as long as it has seen your face recently? Like the Apple Watch doesnt require authentication as long as it stays on your wrist after the first pin code entry.
Stupid question time. Since it seems apparent that the new AppleTV will be 4K with HDR and Dolby Vision, what are the odds that Apple shows off the new phone cameras that will record 4k video in HDR10 and Dolby Vision?
Google "bad HDR photography", same technique, with super stylized over-processing.Glowy thing?
Previous iPhones have stacked exposures to restore detail in shadows and highlights during HDR capture. What "glowy thing" you talking about?
As long as its better than the S8.
Twins:
https://youtu.be/5oFcGNDv-Y4
And with a photo on a non-demo unit:
https://youtu.be/_RiaMkyKmFg
My understanding is there are two types of face unlocks on the s8. The less secure one that can be fooled by a pic and the iris scan method that is similar to Windows hello. Is that not true?
I just hope that UHD movies playback will come to Windows version of iTunes, because I don't want to buy an Apple TV just for that when my PC is connected to my TV. And that it won't require a recent CPU, I'm still rocking a Sandy Bridge i7 that I'm not going to replace anytime soon.
1080p movies work on my desktop even if iTunes says that it isn't compatible, hope it's the same for 4K movies.
Decoding 4K HEVC on a Sandy Bridge CPU is going to be a world of hurt. Maybe if your GPU has hardware HEVC acceleration.
If you're on the latest Windows 10, try playing "Camp (Nature) 4K HDR Demo (Sony)" from http://www.4ktv.de/testvideos/ in Windows Media Player and see how that goes.
I have the latest MBP with HEVC. I can't get it to play in Quick Time and it just dies on VLC. IINA is able to play it at a very choppy pace, but my laptop goes crazy. I'm guessing that VLC and IINA are not taking advantage of the hardware-level HVEC decoding?Decoding 4K HEVC on a Sandy Bridge CPU is going to be a world of hurt. Maybe if your GPU has hardware HEVC acceleration.
If you're on the latest Windows 10, try playing "Camp (Nature) 4K HDR Demo (Sony)" from http://www.4ktv.de/testvideos/ in Windows Media Player and see how that goes.
I have the latest MBP with HEVC. I can't get it to play in Quick Time and it just dies on VLC. IINA is able to play it at a very choppy pace, but my laptop goes crazy. I'm guessing that VLC and IINA are not taking advantage of the hardware-level HVEC decoding?
I just hope that UHD movies playback will come to Windows version of iTunes, because I don't want to buy an Apple TV just for that when my PC is connected to my TV. And that it won't require a recent CPU, I'm still rocking a Sandy Bridge i7 that I'm not going to replace anytime soon.
1080p movies work on my desktop even if iTunes says that it isn't compatible, hope it's the same for 4K movies.
If I were you I'd immediately stop buying things on iTunes. You're just making it hard for yourself.
Hmmm... any players that already do HEVC hardware acceleration?VLC and IINA don't support HEVC hardware acceleration on Mac yet, and QuickTime won't until High Sierra.
The intel modem shit is grossly exaggerated.Yeah... I expect to see a lot of user reports about the issues with cell/wifi/bluetooth. I have no faith in intel
I hope I'm wrong
Hmmm... any players that already do HEVC hardware acceleration?
As far as RAM goes, Smith says the iPhone 8 will feature 2GB, while the iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X will both feature 3GB. For comparisons sake, the iPhone 7 Plus features 3GB of RAM and the iPhone 7 packs 2GB. As you can see, theres not a huge difference in terms of RAM specs here but
In terms of camera technology, Smith says the iPhone X will feature a 12MP rear-facing camera with support for 4K video at 60 FPS and 1080p video at 240 FPS. As for the front camera, the device packs a 7MP camera with support for 1080p video at 30 FPS.
By digging into the code, he believes the new Apple TV will be powered by an A10X Fusion chip, coupled with 3GB RAM. This represents a big increase in power and may signal a larger direction beyond 4K movies and TV shows. [...]
Troughton-Smith notes that the A10 series may have been required to play 4K 60FPS content, which users will be able to shoot with the new iPhone 8 and iPhone X
How long after the keynote finishes can it be watched online? It's starts at 3am where I live and I wanna watch it before work from like 630am maybe.
i haven't read the sticky article but are they saying one camera for the iPhone x?Steve Troughton Smith via 9to5mac
https://9to5mac.com/2017/09/10/ipho...f-ram-iphone-8-plus-and-iphone-x-to-pack-3gb/
I think you could watch the live-stream with timeshift (on some devices/browsers) the last couple of keynotes and it didn't take them very long to put up the whole video after the presentation was over. You should be fine.
lmaoOf course Face ID will work with Apple Pay, see this leaked photo
i haven't read the sticky article but are they saying one camera for the iPhone x?
He's talking about the sensors, no specifics yet on how the rear vertical dual-lens camera system will work.
Given that there are people in threads on NeoGAF complaining about the "huge" bezels on current iPhones, there's obviously a market out there that wants edge to edge displays, and it's kind of pointless to make any firm declarations on the subject's utility when it hasn't been released (my reservations are entirely theoretical until we see Apple's implementation.)
If you're the person who needs on-board USB-A ports, it's not like someone's forcing you to buy a Mac. And yet Mac sales continue to hold steady or climb. While it sucks to realize your opinion doesn't matter: it doesn't. Most people don't care. The world turns. You can either accept other people have different priorities or concerns than you, or go on a message forum and rage about "sheeple".
I feel like a big reason that AppleTV would get comparatively beefy specs is simply to get a longer-lived product if they're not updating it every year.
Sure, but when did the iPhone ever produce those types of pictures in-camera?Google "bad HDR photography", same technique, with super stylized over-processing.
I was using a Samsung galaxy s8 at work this morning for about 20 minutes and I'm already smitten by no bezels. I've taken a look in stores before and thought 'whats the big deal', but using one even for just a short time is very different