Silicon Alley Insider first reported that NBC has developed an iPhone-specific version of their website that will stream Quicktime versions of some of their television shows.
iPhone and iPod Touch owners need only to point their mobile browser to NBC.com and they will automatically be redirected an optimized version of their site that offers video clips and full episodes.
The quality of the video clips are a bit low, but over the site appears very well designed. It also appears to be accessible to international users.
aparisi2274 said:I just read this on macrumors.net
I took a look at The Office and 30 Rock. The quality is ok, nothing spectacular. If you are not near a wifi hot spot, it will probably take forever to load, but over a wifi connection, it streamed beautifully
awesome, bookmarked.aparisi2274 said:I just read this on macrumors.net
I took a look at The Office and 30 Rock. The quality is ok, nothing spectacular. If you are not near a wifi hot spot, it will probably take forever to load, but over a wifi connection, it streamed beautifully
Futureman said:So the US Apple Store now says the iPhone is currently unavailable. This ain't no 2 week wait, it's a flat out not available.
3G iPhone imminent? (Well obviously it's imminent, but sooner than we thought??)
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:It doesn't make sense to announce a phone at a developer's conference, especially when the updates are going to be minor and predictable. Remember the new Mac Pros a week before Macworld?
AndersTheSwede said:Since there doesn't seem to be a Touch thread I'll put this here.
I just got an iPod Touch (love it, greatest peice of electronics I've ever owned) but one thing I've noticed is that you can practically watch the battery drain when using safari. This seems strange to me as playing 800+ kbs videos for an hour barely puts a dent in the battery. What's going on here? Does 2.0 adress this?
Burger said:Constant wifi use sucks battery ?
AndersTheSwede said:Except it happens when I'm just sitting at a loaded page. Its just surprising how much battery safari uses over even video.
SuperPac said:Yeah I don't see Apple waiting until WWDC to update. They can't go a full month with no product to even let people order/preorder online. That would be a HUGE blunder on their part, basically giving up an entire month to let people buy Blackberries and other competing phones (and get roped into contracts) because the iPhone's out of stock. Apple can't be that stupid.
How would anyone know this?ant1532 said:How much is the 3G phone supposed to be?
Munin said:Okay, uh, the situation is this: In summer I'm gonna be away from home for a long time, and possibly from any computers too. Since I don't have a laptop, and I haven't had a cellphone for a long time, I thought I could kill two birds with one stone. So I was thinking about getting a phone that's good to browse the web with, check emails etc. The iPhone is probably the best choice for that (although if you can recommend a (cheaper) phone that can do these tasks while being equally comfortable, feel free to do so).
Anyway, the dilemma is obvious, they're gonna release a new version soon. But for me, that may already be too late (and possibly too expensive). Were there any hints already at what kind of improvements the new one would offer? Would any new firmwares, functions, applications etc. still work on my old one? And I don't only mean ones released in the near future, but more...in a long-term perspective.
Phoenix said:It would be odd for Apple to launch a new iPhone without the new OS and the new OS is NOWHERE near ready for prime time.
Note that this is not fake, it is in the beta 5 .ipsw, but will normally not show up on an EDGE iPhone. Turning 3G on will just crash the phone if you use an EDGE phone. If you do not believe me, then decrypt the beta5 rootfs dmg, and see for yourself in /Applications/Preferences.app/Network.plist
giga said:
ant1532 said:How much is the 3G phone supposed to be?
Grain of Salt said:The reason for a pre-WWDC announcement? Reportedly, Apple would instead announce a brand new portable device at WWDC. No other details of what this device might be, but there have been rumors that Apple was developing a mini-tablet multitouch device for launch in 2008. This PDA-like device would reportedly have a higher screen resolution (720x480) and be about 1.5x the size of the existing iPhone.
SuperPac said:Well it's a month or so away from prime time. They couldn't introduce a new model that runs the old OS in the meantime?
Juice said:This is just getting too delicious. 3G iPhone this month with mini-tablet next month?
http://www.macrumors.com/2008/05/11/3g-iphone-in-may-another-device-at-wwdc/
Juice said:This is just getting too delicious. 3G iPhone this month with mini-tablet next month?
http://www.macrumors.com/2008/05/11/3g-iphone-in-may-another-device-at-wwdc/
Phoenix said:No, because the old OS doesn't support 3G. All of the functionality for that is in the new OS which is still very much beta, but I guess anything is possible.
SuperPac said:An iPhone-like tablet the size of a paperback book or manga would be nice. Then they could (maybe) start selling books via iTunes as well. That'd be interesting. But I'd like something a little more like a tablet in form factor and function.
Phoenix said:No, because the old OS doesn't support 3G. All of the functionality for that is in the new OS which is still very much beta, but I guess anything is possible.
Juice said:One never knows what god-like access you have, but there's always the chance that the current seed is just pretty stale. A month out, the Leopard seeds were horrific. (Some would argue the launch was as well, but even with the hellish experience I had, it was nowhere near as bad as Tiger's.)
SuperPac said:I thought the new iPhone OS has a preference for turning 3G on/off. New phone ships with 1.1.4, 3G is off. How difficult would that be? Or, new phone ships with 1.1.5 with the 3G preference but none of the other iPhone 2.0 features like the app store.
I just don't think Apple's gonna go a month without selling another iPhone. That would be horrifically stupid of them.
Phoenix said:Why would you ship a 3G iPhone and turn 3G off? That would be retarded IMO. They certainly could push out a branch of the OS before 2.0, but it just seems odd that they would be tossing the phone out so quickly and without any marketing campaign. Haven't seen any invites or anything else which is where Apple would push a major model release like this.
Phoenix said:Why would you ship a 3G iPhone and turn 3G off? That would be retarded IMO. They certainly could push out a branch of the OS before 2.0, but it just seems odd that they would be tossing the phone out so quickly and without any marketing campaign. Haven't seen any invites or anything else which is where Apple would push a major model release like this.
SuperPac said:Spending a month or more with no phones to sell is more retarded, IMO. I mean, they sold Apple TVs in advance of the 2.0 software update in that case.
SuperPac said:Spending a month or more with no phones to sell is more retarded, IMO. I mean, they sold Apple TVs in advance of the 2.0 software update in that case.
Juice said:I still think that sales were just a tad better than internally anticipated + they wanted some period of unavailability to avoid the massive backlash they had from the price drop.
SuperPac said:But they didn't have a period of unavailability before they introduced the 16GB version in February. They don't have periods of unavailability for ANY of their other *more expensive* hardware. Personally, the $200 drop after 2 months of availability was a very rare case. Maybe sales were better than internally anticipated but IMO this is maybe the worst time for that to happen when US consumers are getting stimulus checks to spend and graduation/father's day is here.
Honestly, the availability of a 3G iPhone, IMO, isn't going to completely kill demand for a (presumably cheaper) 2.5G version. Just as people buy iPod Shuffles, Nanos, etc. when there are "better" iPods available.
Phoenix said:Well AT&T is pushing 3G in a big way now. They don't really want to push any new non-3G smartphones onto their network. Their "words" not mine. On top of that, I'm sure this next batch of phones is being manufactured more cheaply than the previous batch and they don't want to pay for a new line for the old line. If the new phones are that plastic crap, I really want the old phone design.
Phoenix said:Well AT&T is pushing 3G in a big way now. They don't really want to push any new non-3G smartphones onto their network. Their "words" not mine. On top of that, I'm sure this next batch of phones is being manufactured more cheaply than the previous batch and they don't want to pay for a new line for the old line. If the new phones are that plastic crap, I really want the old phone design.
SuperPac said:My thing is just that no other product in Apple's history has gone unavailable even before a new version is out
Juice said:False.
Apple also miscalculated iMac demand of the bulbous iMac as they were phasing it out. It was out of stock in early July in advance of an intended August launch of the pizza-box iMac, which was ultimately delayed for a while. There was a solid couple months where it was inordinately difficult to buy any iMac at all, which cost Apple a crucial back-to-school season.
SuperPac said:Hell, as soon as the next iPhone is available for purchase or preorder I will be on that bandwagon, with or without the new software and even if 3G isn't gonna be "enabled" until then.
SuperPac said:OK, so it's been years since it's happened. (I didn't remember that particular episode.) Either way, I don't think they can go very long with it being "unavailable."
Phoenix said:The thing is that you're treating 3G like its a software feature to just be enabled. The 3G chips are a different chipset altogether. You either write firmware for the chip or not. So if they ship a 3G iPhone you've got a 3G phone because you're running on a 3G chip/modem. They can have it seek the slower network to reduce power consumption and shit down parts of the chip (which they will), but its not like they will put out a device with 2.5 capabilities and a firmware upgrade to 3G.
SuperPac said:Right. But there's a control panel in the beta 2.0 software to toggle 3G on/off. They couldn't ship an iPhone that has a version of the OS (1.1.5 or better) that has that control panel?
I would buy this.SuperPac said:An iPhone-like tablet the size of a paperback book or manga would be nice. Then they could (maybe) start selling books via iTunes as well. That'd be interesting. But I'd like something a little more like a tablet in form factor and function.
I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. The iPhone 2.0 beta has been identified as version 1.2 (not sure about the latest beta versions), this firmware used in the current iPhone models appears to be the same as that which will be used for the 3G model, thus it has the 3G code and settings included. However, these settings are disabled when the firmware is running on current models, people have managed to access it by modifying some files and things, but it will not do anything useful except on 3G iPhones.SuperPac said:Right. But there's a control panel in the beta 2.0 software to toggle 3G on/off. They couldn't ship an iPhone that has a version of the OS (1.1.5 or better) that has that control panel?
hirokazu said:I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. The iPhone 2.0 beta has been identified as version 1.2 (not sure about the latest beta versions), this firmware used in the current iPhone models appears to be the same as that which will be used for the 3G model, thus it has the 3G code and settings included. However, these settings are disabled when the firmware is running on current models, people have managed to access it by modifying some files and things, but it will not do anything useful except on 3G iPhones.