What's your bad "news"? That he/she's in fact wrong about these people that he/she personally knows, and that you, as an outsider without any personal information about them outside of their vote in the 2016 presidential election, and having never met them, are here to enlighten said poster by declaring these people to be definitively "bad"?
Because that would be absurd if that's what your news is.
I mean, it means the people who he knows, even if they're very nice in his eyes, are still completely complacent with all of the fallout that's happened due to the Trump administration.
So while his family and friends may not be racist, they're fine with racists, they're fine with sexists, they're fine with xenophobia. That is the message voting for trump and supporting him to this point puts across. It's a big fat, "I'm not racist...BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT..."
And that's not uncommon, because until it's happening directly to you, most people don't care about anything. But let's not sugar coat this.
If only we had figured out earlier that the age-old question of what it means to be "good" can be easily answered by looking at a single vote! Would've saved us thousands of years worth of ethical quandaries.
Yes, it's almost like we didn't just have an election where the popular vote was a major factor.
Oh wait...