• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kayo Satoh: Sexy Japanese model, Street Fighter fan, and...

Status
Not open for further replies.

big_z

Member
that girl has the body of a 12 year old boy...

EDIT: just read the OP. fuck yea, gaydar is still working!
 

Chuckie

Member
big_z said:
that girl has the body of a 12 year old boy...


HS013138.jpg
 

Shanadeus

Banned
Nameless said:
GAF doesn't constitute "most people". I lean left, but this place is nauseatingly liberal sometimes.
I'm pretty sure this doesn't apply to just GAF.
When you talk to some friend and he sees a moderately attractive female pass down on the street and makes a comment on her appearance then he's not expressing his appreciation of her based on her having a vagina, uterus or chromosomes. He's instead appreciating her appearance which strikes him as feminine and fulfill whatever criteria he has for a female and a hot one on top of that.

And that's how he judge her to be a woman, even though this woman in particular might have a penis.

GAF liberal? :lol
It almost feels republican at times, with all the disdain for abortions and love for the death penalty a lot of people here have.
 

scotcheggz

Member
So I asked my girlfriend about this girl when she got back from work last night and showed her the pictures, she hadn't heard of her, but just shrugged and said that transgender idols are pretty popular in japan these days. Fair play.
 

Shito

Member
Vox-Pop said:
C'mon guys, she's not that skinny.
I've learned recently that here on GAF "skinny" should be read as "thin". I suggest you try it: it works wonders!

Regarding the MJ debate (yeah, I'm a little bit late on this, sorry), it's curious, I've never really thought about all this but in my mind I always saw late-MJ as a white person, and young-MJ as a black person. I mean, even though I knew the guy was black, I couldn't help but see him as a white person: I suppose perception does play quite a big role in this matter, and the way you look surely does have a role in the way people see you - thus defining you.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
I had no idea that Buck Angel kept his girly parts because of the cost of building a penis, which is 50K - 70K. And it won't even work when you get it. That's lame.

Oh and that he lost his dominatrix wife to Lana (formerly Larry) Wachowski.

This was an interesting article: Unsure of photo is NSFW. Ahh...lets go with NSFW

http://www.nypress.com/article-13179-man-or-woman-you-decide.html

But the part where he has to go see a gynecologist, I had never considered that.
 
ChiTownBuffalo said:
I had no idea that Buck Angel kept his girly parts because of the cost of building a penis, which is 50K - 70K. And it won't even work when you get it. That's lame.

Oh and that he lost his dominatrix wife to Lana (formerly Larry) Wachowski.

This was an interesting article: Unsure of photo is NSFW. Ahh...lets go with NSFW

http://www.nypress.com/article-13179-man-or-woman-you-decide.html

But the part where he has to go see a gynecologist, I had never considered that.


What I'm asking myself right now: Does he have sex with gay or hetero guys in his movies? Do gay people feel attracted to him and his vagina?
 

beje

Banned
Patrick Bateman said:
What I'm asking myself right now: Does he have sex with gay or hetero guys in his movies? Do gay people feel attracted to him and his vagina?

It's hard to say... he has all the main features of a man, and that's what I like. I really wouldn't mind something "different" down there for a change. Too many insecure guys here thinking they will catch teh gay if they touch a penis, even if it's "attached" to a woman's body.

At the end of the day, I just like guys, if it just happens I hook up with one with a vagina... we'll nobody's perfect. It's not like I'm going straight for this :lol
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
sonicmj1 said:
Reading comprehension fail, then.
Would hit before (he knew Kayo was male), would hit after.
In other words, she's feminine-looking enough that her sex is irrelevant.

Wat? How is that possible? It'll be different if she had an operation. I'm sorry but I've personally never heard a guy say that guy is so sexy and feminine looking that I'll have sex with him (even though I only do girls normally).

This is new to me.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
McLovin said:
No no no nooo NOOOOOOOO bad penis! That is a man..

I don't think you need to scold your penis.

I mean....I dunno, I didn't find her attractive as a woman.

Maybe your penis likes?
 

Gui_PT

Member
industrian said:
I guessed "and now a porn star" so I whipped it out. Now I'm conflicted.



S/he looks like a girl I know at work.


Now you're going to wonder if she too, might be a dude.
 

agrajag

Banned
Shanadeus said:
I'm pretty sure this doesn't apply to just GAF.
When you talk to some friend and he sees a moderately attractive female pass down on the street and makes a comment on her appearance then he's not expressing his appreciation of her based on her having a vagina, uterus or chromosomes. He's instead appreciating her appearance which strikes him as feminine and fulfill whatever criteria he has for a female and a hot one on top of that.

And that's how he judge her to be a woman, even though this woman in particular might have a penis.

GAF liberal? :lol
It almost feels republican at times, with all the disdain for abortions and love for the death penalty a lot of people here have.

Uh, no. if i'm commenting on a woman i find attractive, i do so with a 100% assumption that she has a vagina. wtf
 

TxdoHawk

Member
He definitely passes the test: I linked a female friend of mine, she didn't read the story and was like "Wow, she's cute." I then suggested reading comprehension to her (after making a much-needed "I guess you don't read Playboy for the articles, eh?" joke) and she was genuinely surpised.
 

sonicmj1

Member
mckmas8808 said:
Wat? How is that possible? It'll be different if she had an operation. I'm sorry but I've personally never heard a guy say that guy is so sexy and feminine looking that I'll have sex with him (even though I only do girls normally).

This is new to me.

The theory is pretty straightforward.

courage-wolf-38.jpg


Makes sense to me.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
Jamesfrom818 said:
EDIT: Hard to keep up with whats bannable these days

Instead of trying to keep up with everything that's bannable or not bannable, why not just keep up with what's respectful and what's hurtful and do your best not to be hurtful? :p
 
Apesht Mcfckface said:
Oh fuck! I could have gone my entire life and never knew who buck angel was.......this after a family sized serving of macaroni n cheese...damn you google...

Yeah, I got curious myself after just hearing of Buck from this thread.

....

Wow. I've never seen anything like that. More power to him, I guess. He won't have to deal with morning wood or awkward boners. :lol
 
Stumpokapow said:
Instead of trying to keep up with everything that's bannable or not bannable, why not just keep up with what's respectful and what's hurtful and do your best not to be hurtful? :p

Some words are only hurtful in 20% of contexts and respectful or just irrelevant in the other 80%. So someone uses a word in a completely respectful, non-derogatory, casual, maybe even clinically detached manner, and if someone thinks they are using the 20% hurtful part then they are banned for a year.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
ChiTownBuffalo said:
I don't think you need to scold your penis.

I mean....I dunno, I didn't find her attractive as a woman.

Maybe your penis likes?

If you don't find that to be an attractive female (in a general sense at least, even if not a personal one), without knowing that she isn't actually a female, then it's evident that your standards are set higher than they should be.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
Zaptruder said:
If you don't find that to be an attractive female (in a general sense at least, even if not a personal one), without knowing that she isn't actually a female, then it's evident that your standards are set higher than they should be.

This is an ex of mine. (Not the one I Google'd btw)

rosie.jpg


I dunno that my standards are super high.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
DarciisFyer said:
Some words are only hurtful in 20% of contexts and respectful or just irrelevant in the other 80%. So someone uses a word in a completely respectful, non-derogatory, casual, maybe even clinically detached manner, and if someone thinks they are using the 20% hurtful part then they are banned for a year.

1) No one is banned for a year over language. Language bans are relatively short and minor. People need to stop looking at all bans as equal; some bans are very clearly, based on length and ban message, a "take a time out" punishment. Some bans are intended to be a "shape up" punishment. Some bans are intended to be a "go away" punishment. Junior members who are banned are generally permed regardless of offence. Language bans are almost always "time outs".

2) No one has ever been banned for using an offensive word in a detached or clinical context.

3) The "it's a trap" meme refers to the idea that transgendered people are trying to trick you. This is disrespectful, very inherently. It may be that people who use it have never thought about what it means and they are just meme machines who regurgitate any meme they've seen regardless of understanding it. Those people can reconsider the practice of blindly reposting one-line memes during their short, "time out" bans.
 

ChiTownBuffalo

Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
Zaptruder said:
Eh. Then you're just particular.

I think its the relative thiness of her. In my mind's perception, Asian women with that bone structure I see as too skinny for me.

This is also a relfection of my own body image when I see myself as too big to be with most Asian girls.
 
ChiTownBuffalo said:
I think its the relative thiness of her. In my mind's perception, Asian women with that bone structure I see as too skinny for me.

This is also a relfection of my own body image when I see myself as too big to be with most Asian girls.

Nothing wrong with skinny girls, they still need feminine feature to me though. This particular case you have a complete lack of any shape which is a big turn off. Same manner that a woman with the bone structure of a linebacker is going to be a big turn off.
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
Stumpokapow said:
Instead of trying to keep up with everything that's bannable or not bannable, why not just keep up with what's respectful and what's hurtful and do your best not to be hurtful? :p
Absolutely not. It has to be like first grade.

Johnny... Don't say that word.
Teddy... Don't make fun of her
Susan... You shouldn't play with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom