zomgbbqftw
Banned
If GG don't step it up for their new IP I think Sony have to shut them down, tax wheeze or not.
Killzone: Shadow Fall is an excellent way to kick off the eighth console generation. Sure, its characters may not be all that convincing, and its multiplayer is more a well-crafted distraction than a long-term destination, but the game as a whole contains plenty of unexpected surprises that make it worth your time. The open-ended missions, though not as plentiful as you might like, are made even better thanks to the awesome tools at your disposal, and its story has some powerful moments that are sure to catch you off guard. And even when it hits lulls, you'll still have a great time shooting to your heart's content.
I cant understand why Plygon still scores at MetaCritics. The most biased game press EVER!
You have picked the one Killzone game not made by GG, Mercenary was made by SCE Cambridge!
Also gave Dead Space 3 a 9.5.
Mercenary was pretty freaking awesome.
Can't wait for 10/10 Dead Rising 3
Isn't the Cambridge studio part of Guerrilla too though? Thought it was.You have picked the one Killzone game not made by GG, Mercenary was made by SCE Cambridge!
same here. this is the specific critique that has me worried I wont get very far in the game. I hate strictly linear corridor shooters and was only excited about KZSF because they opened it up.
but if it's only open for half or less of the campaign. then ehhhhhhh
All the demos of KZ:SF were of the open forest level. Shame the rest of the game lacks that non-linear feel. I enjoyed KZ3 more than KZ2, so SF will be a fun weekend type of game. Wasn't a big fan of KZ2/3 MP, so I'm not expecting much out of SF on that front. As expected, it is another good KZ game that doesn't change much.
Yeah, that's my primary negative takeaway from this - it's too bad that the experience regresses into standard level- and encounter-design fare. I've always thought that Crysis 1 was a great, great vision that other linear shooters should be inspired from, but alas...
Meanwhile I expected the handling and treatment of the game's theme to be primitive at best, so that's okay by me.
Why do you guys make such a big scene out of this stuff? It always makes gamers online look so bad. Wait until you play the game and then you can deconstruct the reviews point by point. Hysterical screaming is so wasteful.
Why do you guys make such a big scene out of this stuff? It always makes gamers online look so bad. Wait until you play the game and then you can deconstruct the reviews point by point. Hysterical screaming is so wasteful.
So why were we expecting Gies's review score?
5 is an absolutely insane score dripping in agenda.
6 was already a fairly absurd score for Mercenaries earlier this year, but well what can you do.
Always enjoyed the KZ games, never really gotten the blowback on them (other than 3's far too fucked-with MP compared to 2's perfection) when most media outlets dont have the balls to give COD the same treatment in kind.
All the people expecting Killzone to be a good game and not just a fantastic graphical showcase was in denial.
Bought a ps3 in preparation of owing a ps4 and the Killzone games are all average.
This quote sums up my experience with this series so far and it sounds as if not much has changed.
If GG don't step it up for their new IP I think Sony have to shut them down, tax wheeze or not.
So a standard Killzone game. Pretty but rubbish. Colour me unsurprised.
It is when Killzone, the only major launch exclusive, was seen as the "next big evolution" in the series, and a major improvement over the last ones. And it's getting mediocre reviews. Not a good start.
Ouch. Big big ouch.
I wasn't expecting this level of scores. I will go to the Knack thread now. Should be interesting.
OH SHIT!!!
anyone who lets polygon's review influence them is just silly.
If pessimist Jeff Gerstmann likes the game, it cannot be that bad.
Sounds like Killzone and I cannot fucking wait.
Also, is it bassackwards that a low score from Gies makes me want the game more?
Says the man with the Killzone avatar.
Sorry, but calling Polygon a joke because "muh exclusive game review score is low" is just laughable. To accuse Polygon of a bias when you obviously have some bias in expecting 7-9 review scores as standard for a big budget, well-marketed, game that you're anticipating is to some extent hypocritical.
I'm not disagreeing with the overall premise of that quote - but Crysis 1 remains an excellent AND gorgeous game.
So I guess Polygon prefers Call of Duty Ghosts to Killzone?
Or do they follow the "different reviewers different scores you cannot compare them" moto???
Honestly, the guys at Polygon are smart. They know what they are doing.
Polygon's review/score = irrelevant shit as usual. 5/10? Those guys try way, way too hard. What a bunch of bullshitters.
All I need to hear.If pessimist Jeff Gerstmann likes the game, it cannot be that bad.
Isn't the Cambridge studio part of Guerrilla too though? Thought it was.