SoldierOfLight
Member
Day 1 for me.
Unbreakable is a sequel to Signs?
Something tells me this won't be as profitable personally for Night as Split was. I can't see Blumhouse letting him put up his own money again based on what happened with Split.
Something tells me I'm gonna miss out on this twist since I can't remember anything from Signs.Hence the twist
What a time to be alive. Shyamalan has redeemed himself!
Disney owns Unbreakable and all of the characters in the film. Shyamalaan made a gentlemens deal with Disney to use the character David Dunn in Split for free just as long as Disney gets to be involved in the sequel. So expect it to be joint venture between Blumhouse/Shyamalan, Universal, and Disney.
James Newton Howard or bust.
This made it worth watching Split (imo his worst film so far).
First question: when did the public opinion on Unbreakable turn around? The movie was mediocre at best and iirc was not very well-recieved at release
Second question: is Bruce going to sleepwalk through this role like every role he's played in the last 10 years?
First question: when did the public opinion on Unbreakable turn around? The movie was mediocre at best and iirc was not very well-recieved at release
Second question: is Bruce going to sleepwalk through this role like every role he's played in the last 10 years?
Well you would have to see Unbreakable first and also not know Spilt had anything to do with Unbreakable. So when you see the ending to Split you'll know and it's fucking awesome. I just thought Split was another M. Night thriller and nothing more.
Years ago. And it was never medicore just poorly marketed on release.
Years ago. And it was never medicore just poorly marketed on release.
It's his best film and it's ace.Nah, it was definitely mediocre. Just because it's Shyamalans like 3rd best film doesn't mean it's good.
Awesome, never had intentions to see Split, but guess I have to now.
Nah, it was definitely mediocre. Just because it's Shyamalans like 3rd best film doesn't mean it's good.
People have considered it to be one of M. Night's best films for a while now. I remember a lot of the criticism of the movie on release centering on its "twist" not being as good as The Sixth Sense's. Which is pretty shallow.First question: when did the public opinion on Unbreakable turn around? The movie was mediocre at best and iirc was not very well-recieved at release
Second question: is Bruce going to sleepwalk through this role like every role he's played in the last 10 years?
...huh?Split was just as bad as his other recent films, pretentious, up it's own ass, hammy and ludicrously dumb, so I have no hope for this sequel.
It should've happened ages ago though.
It's his best film and it's ace.
It's one of the best comic book origin stories ever made.
I remember the reception to Unbreakable being pretty positive around release. Especially so a couple years after. Not like Sixth Sense positive, but still up there.First question: when did the public opinion on Unbreakable turn around? The movie was mediocre at best and iirc was not very well-recieved at release
Luckily that would kind of fit his character in Unbreakable lol.Second question: is Bruce going to sleepwalk through this role like every role he's played in the last 10 years?
It's his best film and it's ace.
Truth.
Unbreakable is the only M. Night movie that you can seriously analyze post-viewing and take away anything further than the sophomoric surface-layer cheese the rest of his catalog has produced, in my eyes.
Unbreakable is so much better than Signs, The Village, The Lady in the Water, Split, etc, that it feels like M. Night watched a different director produce that film and then tried to measure up since viewing.
Nah, it was definitely mediocre. Just because it's Shyamalans like 3rd best film doesn't mean it's good.
You're brain washed on the current state of SH films and blinded by originality.
This made it worth watching Split (imo his worst film so far).
The Village is up there for me as far as post viewing. The dialogue and score are masterful. Who ever wrote the screenplay is a god.
I guess if you want back into the good graces of moviegoers, all you have to do is turn your 15 year old one-off comic book movie into a cinematic universe owned by Disney.
Congrats to M. Night, I suppose
Eh, The Visit was alright too, shockingly enough. Split more-so, regardless of not being in love it with it.
It's almost like he's made 2 good movies in a row now too or something?I guess if you want back into the good graces of moviegoers, all you have to do is turn your 15 year old one-off comic book movie into a cinematic universe owned by Disney.
Congrats to M. Night, I suppose
OK seriously you guys are just trolling now
OK seriously you guys are just trolling now
lmao right? Unbreakable is a great movie, Split's ending made me crazy, and now this.. M. Night better not screw this up like The Happening!
I guess if you want back into the good graces of moviegoers, all you have to do is turn your 15 year old one-off comic book movie into a cinematic universe owned by Disney.
Congrats to M. Night, I suppose
Ah so I don't like a film I haven't seen in 10 years because of Marvel's saccharine superhero movies and DC's dour snoozefests? Good to know
People don't agree with your opinion. Deal with it.
This really isn't hard to understand too lol. Unbreakable is considered one of his better movies and got good reception, the visit was alright and got decent reception, split was pretty good too and also got great reception. Now he's making a sequel to two of his better movies with a talented cast to boot. If someone didn't like them fine but stop acting like you're taking crazy pills or being trolled or something, you're in the minority opinion. Either explain what you didn't like about the movies or understand that people have different tastes that don't align with yours lol.People don't agree with your opinion. Deal with it.