Sanjuro Tsubaki said:
These vague responses aren't really helpful. I mean even the others who posted didn't know what you were talking about. Neither do I, I didn't figure any of this was even debatable.
Sanjuro, you are disingenuous here. The other posters responded to me telling you to shut up. Because you make less sense than the little Christmas bear figurine I have that sings "hump hump humpity dump dump dumpity Merry Christmas" and poops candy. They were not responding to my "Texas is going to arod themselves."
Let's look at the context and then follow this discussion.
1. Following a series of posts discussing contract length and dollar value, I say Texas will arod themselves if they do win.
2. You say they are two materially different situations.
3. I ask how the situations are materially different and clarify exactly what I meant.
4. You continue on a rambling path about the actual quality of the team, which is not at all what I was talking about. And you know this, because I was talking now about revenue streams.
5. I clarify again and say they are not materially different; however, even if we were on your terms, I do not understand the Arod vs. Lee argument. You are talking about Lee being a gamble, whatever, it has nothing to do with what I'm saying.
6. You repeat that the situations are different.
Do you follow what I am saying? Is this more helpful?