We should watch very closely to see if any new titles are conspicuously absent from Frazier's analysis.Karma said:Should get numbers for Reach and other top titles at least.
We should watch very closely to see if any new titles are conspicuously absent from Frazier's analysis.Karma said:Should get numbers for Reach and other top titles at least.
I think that's what NPD is saying they'll provide though: A weekly ranking, plus selective numbers for major new releases.Opiate said:No one suggested that the information provided by other sources was absolute and comprehensive (for the record, however, both Billboard and the Box Office as examples, frequently provide direct sales data, particularly at the launch of a major new property on CD or DVD). But what we have now is 1) Nothing vs 2) A weekly ranking of all the titles for DVD/CD/Singles/Box Office/Books/etc.
sangreal said:Not because they caught him (he adjusted the numbers and he still posts), but because the practice was banned when NPD started making threats. Then they reached the compromise of releasing the numbers officially or whatever
Rhindle said:I think that's what NPD is saying they'll provide though: A weekly ranking, plus selective numbers for major new releases.
Did you mean monthly, or are they really switching to weekly top tens? Would be cool if they were.Rhindle said:I think that's what NPD is saying they'll provide though: A weekly ranking, plus selective numbers for major new releases.
Sorry, I meant monthly.Fredescu said:Did you mean monthly, or are they really switching to weekly top tens? Would be cool if they were.
I rather do hope that someone starts leaking real numbers to someone like ioi. Mostly for the comedy factor. Especially given GAF's stance on ioi. That's the double-comedy factor.apana said:Well what if somebody posted the numbers on a blog? Surely members of this forum, or the whole forum itself, cant be threatened for simply posting "rumors" we found on other websites.
Draft said:So, are people who leak numbers going to be banned?
Yep. I don't know what GAF can use, maybe a picture of all the unmoved stock still on shelves at a local store. :lolplagiarize said:I hope so. We have no way of verifying the numbers. So anyone could CLAIM to have seen the move vs kinect numbers and CLAIM that the one they want to see failing is failing.
luxarific said:Don't get this comment. The whole point of "one console future" is not that manufacturers will only make one type of box, but that every box will be able to play the same games. No more exclusives and no essentially duplicative hardware taking up space on my tv table. MS, Sony, Nintendo and others will still be able to differentiate their consoles with add-on services (Live, PSN) and functions. But all boxes will be able to play all games.
Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
If it only was that easy.Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
You humans will fight over who is on the most important team regardless.Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
Yeah, the quality of discussion in Media Create threads is much higher than in NPD/PAL Charts threads because people have little room to spin data.Rocksteady33 said:Is it that hard for some of you people to realize that some people actually enjoy interpreting data and looking at video games from the business side of things? This is terrible news. It's bad enough that PAL numbers have more or less been unknown forever, adding the US to this leaves us completely in the dark on how most games do.
Seriously some people here don't look for monthly NPD threads to simply say "lol ps3 numbers" but actually care and observe market trends.
This seriously sucks.
Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
It's a fallacy to claim removing a credible number source makes things better for the "console warz". . . unless you prefer VG*****Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
10,000 Creationists can't be wrong!Pureauthor said:Once again, what chain of logic allows you to get the conclusion that having less information will lead to more intelligent discourse?
Blame! said:
Rhindle said:As far as I know:
Nobody publishes DVD sales numbers. No one publishes CD sales numbers. Or book sales numbers. All you get is sales rankings, plus an occasional award for selling 500K or a million copies of something.
I'm not happy about this news, but the sense of entitlement is misplaced. NPD thought it could benefit its business by publishing some numbers and generating some publicity/goodwill. Apparently, it did not work out for them.
US DVDs: Ending week of October 3rd said:1 (-) Iron Man 2: 2,822,173
2 (-) Get Him to the Greek: 461,707
3 (1) Tinker Bell and the Great Fairy Rescue: 382,122
4 (2) Robin Hood: 316,366
5 (-) Superman/Batman: Apocalypse: 152,397
6 (-) Family Guy: Partial Terms of Endearment: 126,151
7 (3) Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time: 113,451
8 (20) Iron Man: 94,529
9 (6) How I Met Your Mother: Season Five: 87,764
10 (7) Barbie: A Fashion Fairytale: 81,279
Imagine there's no fanboys.Blame! said:this.
no more console wars.
Thunder Monkey said:10,000 Creationists can't be wrong!
am sadlegend166 said:The only thing we can get from NPD is monthly top 5s, without numbers, and now no hardware data at all.
:lolronito said:Imagine there's no fanboys.
Imagine there's no exclusives.
God: I damn it, why can't you mortals figure out I created Evolution! It is not a hard concept!100, 000 scientists say otherwise!
Meanwhile, God facepalms
I don't think anything will ever beat Kagari's reports:lolCadetMahoney said:am sad
no gifs or nuthin' from now on, just anecdotal data from trolls and corp PR.
webcivilian said:I really don't think that will be the case. NPD caters to businesses and this shift is clearly positioned towards them.
Awesome so we're getting full spreadsheet like we used to?!Vagabundo said:Back to the good oul' days..
If you got those from The Numbers, then yes, it's the DVD equivalent of VGChartzz.fernoca said:
Didn't, but reading their source it was.Rhindle said:If you got those from The Numbers, then yes, it's the DVD equivalent of VGChartzz.
You're still going to have your stupid fanboy fights. The only difference now is that there won't be anyone intervening with the truth to clear things up. Enjoy.Sloane said:Sales-age dead? That would be awesome.
The truth has never prevented anything.Segata Sanshiro said:You're still going to have your stupid fanboy fights. The only difference now is that there won't be anyone intervening with the truth to clear things up. Enjoy.
If by "interpreting date" you mean "OMG XY BOMBA LOL", then yes, it's hard for me to understand. And looking at some sales numbers isn't really "looking at video games from the business side of things". People just think it is and that's why it is so annoying. Everybody considers himself an analyst / executive these days.Rocksteady33 said:Is it that hard for some of you people to realize that some people actually enjoy interpreting data and looking at video games from the business side of things?
But the truth does make for an awesome punchline.Sloane said:The truth has never prevented anything.
Sloane said:Everybody considers himself an analyst / executive these days.
No shit.:lolNullPointer said:But the truth does make for an awesome punchline.
Sloane said:The truth has never prevented anything.
Sloane said:The truth has never prevented anything.
If by "interpreting date" you mean "OMG XY BOMBA LOL", then yes, it's hard for me to understand. And looking at some sales numbers isn't really "looking at video games from the business side of things". People just think it is and that's why it is so annoying. Everybody considers himself an analyst / executive these days.
I agree. NeoGAF should discuss video games -- instead of sales and business decisions 99% of the board's members know nothing about.antiquegamer said:This is why it's call a discussion board, where people discuss things... on NeoGaf it's about video games.
Sloane said:I agree. NeoGAF should discuss video games -- instead of sales and business decisions 99% of the board's members know nothing about.