Danne-Danger
Member
Wow, this really took off.
Thisisneogafdude.gifRezbit said:This is so weird. We're on a forum, talking about graphics in a videogame in a very aggressive manner. Man...what the **** is wrong with us, lol.
Fight for Freeform said:I'd even say that the textures are pretty poor by today's standards. Not even on the level of Resistance.
:lolY2Kev said:the textures have sharp knees
Pistolero said:Where is the badass HD link ? Share with your teammates !
Pistolero said:Where is the badass HD link ? Share with your teammates !
joshcryer said:The textures will undoubtedly improve, but it must be remembered that the PS3 doesn't have a significant level of texture memory. Much of the textures are going to be constantly paged in and out of memory, so it's going to be interesting to see how well they pull that off in an action game (if we were looking at a highly linear game like GT5 we could logically page in textures given the cars direction and so on, not so with an FPS).
This is why they're focusing so much on post processing and lighting and shadows. And it works fantastically for this game. Just remarkably well. You're not going to be standing perfectly still looking at a wall in this game, I assure you.
this will help a lot of peopleBlimblim said:I'll have the HD version online in about 15 minutes. Sorry about the delay.
Shane's going to be all giddy. I can't wait for that. :lolDefuser said:Oh man,I can't wait for 1upyours now... Shane will completely jizzed all over the podcasters.
Shot in the neck, a Helghast trooper gropes his throat theatrically before trying to return his hands to his gun and taking more bullets in the chest and hips, twisting as each impact shatters his capacity to respond. Elsewhere a frag grenade lands in amongst his friends, and the explosion blows them to their knees and onto their faces. Herman Hurst, MD of Guerrilla, tells us afterwards that enemies react differently not just based on the game's interpretation of positional damage, but also the weapon used.
Probably the most striking thing, however, is that it's a good three or four minutes before we notice something that punctures the atmosphere: the slight tagging of a wall by an allied soldier as he turns a corner, as his character-model's reaction to the scenery overrides his animations.
Ryudo said:The textures dont really need to improve, the film grain masks it. Its insane the way its used, gives it a great epic movie feel.
Ceb said:One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the music. What's in the trailer is really good for "military" type of music. It makes me think of stuff like Terminator and Predator.
I agree with this, but I think it's pretty much expected behavior on the internet.Joates said:Ive already said the graphics look great, theres no denying it. But its not this "second coming" of graphics you guys are making it out to be. And the reactions to the 1up article are absolutely ridiculous. Anything short of "best graphics Ive ever seen" and you guys would have had your pitchforks ready. Its true. They praised the game, but apparently they didnt praise it enough for you all. Do you realize how dumb that is?
Blimblim said:I'll have the HD version online in about 15 minutes. Sorry about the delay.
Ceb said:One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the music. What's in the trailer is really good for "military" type of music. It makes me think of stuff like Terminator and Predator.
Be careful what you wish forYoboman said:Heyyyy what's with this extension on my tag?:lol
"blinder than you"
Mean.
Can one of the mods fix it so the "smarter" part is the link rather than the "you", it'll look better that way
You don't know what you're talking about. The textures are awful. THEY PROVED IT BY NITPICKING IN A SCAN FOR GODS SAKE, WHAT PROOF DO YOU NEED MORE?Y2Kev said:Maybe I'm crazy, but I think the textures look good. Plus ps3 only has 28.5 mb of vram
Y2Kev said:Maybe I'm crazy, but I think the textures look good. Plus ps3 only has 28.5 mb of vram
I think it looks fine tooY2Kev said:Maybe I'm crazy, but I think the textures look good. Plus ps3 only has 28.5 mb of vram
Karma Kramer said:Yes.. but put it this way... the textures look like crap in comparison to the E3 2005 trailer... yet the in-game trailer in motion looks pretty ****ing close to the E3 2005 trailer despite this.
Thats my point.
its forum etiquette.MightyHedgehog said:I agree with this, but I think it's pretty much expected behavior on the internet.
Karma Kramer said:Yeah that film grain hides so much nasty its amazing. Its so clever of GG... I am pissed I didn't think of it myself.
He doesn't like shooters.GeoramA said:Shane's going to be all giddy. I can't wait for that. :lol
joshcryer said:People who appreciate the graphics of this game, and who consider those graphics to be some of the best this generation are not turning this in to anything. It is those out there who have delusional fantasies about their preferred games who think that magically a game with objectively better graphics is somehow inferior. Killzone 2 has and will live up to the expectations of the fans, and it has and will be the best looking FPS out there on any console.
Woo-Fu said:Just loop a couple seconds of a scene from the kz2 video and then note every single thing that is going on, both environmental and player/enemy models. Gears environments while looking quite nice are still almost entirely static. Doesn't appear to be the case with KZ2.
Y2Kev said:Oh, yeah. I agree with you, of course.
I think, most importantly, GG captured the mood of the trailer and pulled off some sweet eye candy to boot.
I think you are over-exaggerating how bad the textures are. The only bad textures I saw were the ones left after the pillars were destroyed, and considering that it was the result of dynamic destruction I can forgive it. Most of the other textures looked as good as CoD 4's, but below Gears. Although there are plenty of things beside textures that go into determining how good a game looks.Karma Kramer said:Yeah that film grain hides so much nasty its amazing. Its so clever of GG... I am pissed I didn't think of it myself.
Y2Kev said:Maybe I'm crazy, but I think the textures look good. Plus ps3 only has 28.5 mb of vram
He gonna jizzed over it regardless.devilscallmedad said:He doesn't like shooters.
Blimblim said:I'll have the HD version online in about 15 minutes. Sorry about the delay.
Yoboman said:I think it looks fine too
If it got any sharper they'd be jarring. It's like what Kojima said about "dirtying" the visuals up. He talked about expressly not having high res assets everywhere because then it starts to look like more and more like a videogame
When is the next 1up Yours for the record?Defuser said:He gonna jizzed over it regardless.
Looking the same as Gears + much more things on screen + dynamic lightning + much bigger place to fight + much better animations .Xzbeat said:Looks awesome! IGN was overreacting though, it looks nowhere near to the 2005 trailer.
Looks about the same as Gears IMO.
The usual.Yoboman said:When is the next 1up Yours for the record?