"Am I following all of this correctly? PR disaster over?"
Your chain of events is slightly incorrect, those were the emails that Daily Beast originally received as their proof for their original article. They posted them to contradict Luckey's statement that he didn't make any posts under NimbleRichMan.
Sorry, when I said "PR disaster over" I was meaning to be sarcastic. Though, is my understanding of the events actually incorrect? I've been trying to follow but I think there's seriously been like a hundred pages in the last 24 hours just about this topic and I've been at work.
Just seemed like Daily Beast reported on this, and he's now essentially admitting everything unless Daily Beast is amazing at guessing things.
Oh wait, I get it, they only released those emails after the statement by Luckey? Hmmm, yeah, I still believe Daily Beast, and I don't even really recognize the name, heh. Like, it just doesn't make any sense to me that they'd start attacking Luckey on this if there wasn't any proof, dude has soo much money, he could lawsuit the hell out of them for defamation.
No. He's the public face of a small company that was bought by a bigger company. Facebook isn't even one of the bigger tech companies out there.
I'm not a huge fan of Facebook, but it's clearly a fairly significant tech company, even if we're not considering profits or share value, it clearly is when considering a societal impact... and I mean, they had Luckey peddling his wares at multiple press conferences. I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong, but this isn't one of those occasions.
Instagram is also a small company purchased by Facebook, it's still Facebook. If the founder of Instagram got all supremisty, I'd expect Facebook to get him gone aswell.