Goodacre0081
Member
this pretty much falls under the same area as "my kid just bought $100 worth of coins for angry ducks, I need a refund"
You're both missing the point. So what if both consoles are on? That means nothing on its own. These users were even aware that both were on. The important point is that the controller's inputs affecting both devices at once is bizarre - and something even Sony's support staff and supervisors doesn't think is true. If Sony themselves didn't anticipate this, and still denies that it's the case, then how can we argue that it's common sense and "user error"? Seems like willful hindsight bias to me.
It isn't officially supported. There are no specific drivers, which is why not everything works. Unless you also think they officially support the PC.Sony themselves advocate it's use. It's officially supported.
Why shouldn't connecting the controller to a PS3 with a cable stop it from sending a wireless signal? Is it really that insane an assumption, honestly?
Common sense has nothing to do with it. People probably just weren't aware that the PS4 was on(do you do a checklist of which electronics are on/off whenever you game?) or didn't realize that a controller working for your PS3 would also be controlling your PS4 at the same time. I've never heard of that before so I'd probably be caught out by that as well.
didn't realize that a controller working for your PS3 would also be controlling your PS4 at the same time.
Why shouldn't connecting the controller to a PS3 with a cable stop it from sending a wireless signal? Is it really that insane an assumption, honestly?
You're both missing the point. So what if both consoles are on? That means nothing on its own. These users were even aware that both were on. The important point is that the controller's inputs affecting both devices at once is bizarre - and something even Sony's support staff and supervisors doesn't think is true. If Sony themselves didn't anticipate this, and still denies that it's the case, then how can we argue that it's common sense and "user error"? Seems like willful hindsight bias to me.
It isn't officially supported. There are no specific drivers, which is why not everything works. Unless you also think they officially support the PC.
I wouldn't say it's officially supported when the controller doesn't work fully with all games but also has limited functions (No PS button, no rumble, no motion detection, etc.) The PS3 just recognizes the DS4 as a generic controller which is more a of a nifty side effect rather than official support.Sony themselves advocate it's use. It's officially supported.
Sony themselves explicitly state that you can use the PS4 pad on a PS3, that's officially supported as far as I'm concerned.
Their 'advocating' goes as far as recognizing it can connect, and then saying they don't know which games work and basically saying they don't care about it. You're grasping at straws to justify your factually wrong thread title and the stupid error by someone that made the error to buy something on his PS4 with his PS4 controller.Sony themselves explicitly state that you can use the PS4 pad on a PS3, that's officially supported as far as I'm concerned.
And that says enough about your basis.Yeah, I imagine if this was Microsoft the thread would be hilariously different. Oh well.
Because the controller is made for the PS4? Its purpose is to serve that device, and that is precisely what it is doing?
You are expecting a device to circumvent the stupidity of people. What is next, microwave will refuse to function if you put explosives in it?
Sony themselves explicitly state that you can use the PS4 pad on a PS3, that's officially supported as far as I'm concerned.
He didn't damage anything or committed a crime though. He made an accidental purchase, and Sony shouldn't want to make business with accidental purchases. Even if they charged some kind of "restocking fee".Personal accountability?
What personal accountability? Let's blame it on others instead!
But even if this isn't the case, then Sony implemented that dual mode for PS3 support only.
Because the controller is made for the PS4? Its purpose is to serve that device, and that is precisely what it is doing?
You are expecting a device to circumvent the stupidity of people. What is next, microwave will refuse to function if you put explosives in it?
I think you're taking this far too personally and distorting things a bit. But at least you're being funny about it. I appreciated the Skynet reference. *thumbs up*Are you kidding me here, people cannot notice the light on the PS4? You cannot tell which electronics device are turned on? Is it even safe for such a person to even own electronic devices?
The common sense is that the PS button on your PS4 controller turns on the console, that is how you turn the thing on, this is in the manual.
Let me quote what you said, again:
Really!? You didnt realize that the controller specifically designed for the PS4 is now...controlling your PS4?!
Because the controller is made for the PS4? Its purpose is to serve that device, and that is precisely what it is doing?
You are expecting a device to circumvent the stupidity of people. What is next, microwave will refuse to function if you put explosives in it?
You made a thread with a very dubious thread title, insisting that Dark Souls 2 was just going amok on PSN, buying every little thing possible. Skynet gone live. Now the PS4 is responsible for having to babysit you?
Look, you put your credit info on that device, what that means, is that you act responsible. You dont put your wallet near your fire place either do you? You put it in a safe spot, because that is common sense.
Their 'advocating' goes as far as recognizing it can connect, and then saying they don't know which games work and basically saying they don't care about it. You're grasping at straws to justify your factually wrong thread title and the stupid error by someone that made the error to buy something on his PS4 with his PS4 controller.
And that says enough about your basis.
It does, when plugged into the PS4. The PS3 doesn't turn off wireless signals when plugged into a PC.The DS3 turns off wireless functions when it's plugged in, why doesn't the DS4?
I come from a country where the "consumer is always right" doesn't exist. I live in a country where the consumer is right when he is right. That is the difference. He bought a PS4 game on his PS4 with his PS4 controller that was linked to a turned on PS4. That is working as planned.Just an assumption because I honestly am amazed how anti-consumer everyone on GAF is. The only explanation that I can come up with is that they must just be pro-Sony because the alternative, that their attitude is genuinely "fuck the consumer" is horrifying. Sony can't afford £50 out of their billions of pounds to refund a guy who made a mistaken purchase enabled by Sony's poorly designed system?
Saying "you can use the PS4 pad on PS3," whatever the caveat, is officially supporting it.
Just an assumption because I honestly am amazed how anti-consumer everyone on GAF is. The only explanation that I can come up with is that they must just be pro-Sony because the alternative, that their attitude is genuinely "fuck the consumer" is horrifying. Sony can't afford £50 out of their billions of pounds to refund a guy who made a mistaken purchase enabled by Sony's poorly designed system?
Sony themselves advocate it's use. It's officially supported..
If we're going down the route of stupid analogies, what about a microwave where a design flaw means that the outer casing reaches 200 degrees and the maker doesn't bother to tell anyone.
Some people won't touch it because they just won't. Other people will just assume that there's no way the outer casing of a microwave would be 200 degrees because why the hell would it be? Then they get burned. Totally their fault?
Stupid analogies don't help.
Saying "you can use the PS4 pad on PS3," whatever the caveat, is officially supporting it.
Just an assumption because I honestly am amazed how anti-consumer everyone on GAF is. The only explanation that I can come up with is that they must just be pro-Sony because the alternative, that their attitude is genuinely "fuck the consumer" is horrifying. Sony can't afford £50 out of their billions of pounds to refund a guy who made a mistaken purchase enabled by Sony's poorly designed system?
I'm thinking they should actually charge him extra and call it "assumption tax".If you're stupid enough to not now this then that is what you get.
I come from a country where the "consumer is always right" doesn't exist. I live in a country where the consumer is right when he is right. That is the difference.
All you're seeing is people who want to point, laugh and say, "haha I told you so."I honestly am amazed how anti-consumer everyone on GAF is.
*furrows brow* This is such a strange thing to say. The point is that these users didn't care that their PS4 was on at the same time because they never imagined the DS4 that was controlling their Dark Souls 2 character was, meanwhile, also active on their other console.If you arent aware that your console is on, which you willingly stored credit card information, then i hope you keep your passport, wallet, credit card in a safe place. Because you are being irresponsible.
I guess I come from a country where if someone designs a system with a flaw in it and someone accidentally discovers and is harmed by that flaw, then they are not punished for it.
However "stupid" his behaviour or the chain of events was, Sony are responsible for designing a system which allowed this to happen and a £50 refund is completely warranted.
So if I tap dance in my controller, I'm not responsible for anything? lol
While I can understand how annoying this must be for people, I don't really see why Sony have to sort out their fuck-ups for them.
I come from a country where the "consumer is always right" doesn't exist. I live in a country where the consumer is right when he is right.
I think you're taking this far too personally and distorting things a bit. But at least you're being funny about it. I appreciated the Skynet reference. *thumbs up*
The DS3 turns off wireless functions when it's plugged in, why doesn't the DS4?
Actually that would be incredibly useful, and whoever figures out how to make that work would make a lot of money. No one should be complaining about a microwave that turns off if someone puts a fork in there.
Seems people defend Sony on anything. ^^ How can it be that you sell a controller which can control 2 devices at once and act as it was the users fault? Come on guys.
Are people that lazy that they don't password protect purchases? If I go to buy something on PSN it prompts me for a password. No amount of pressing things on the controller would ever purchase anything accidentally.
This.
They have no way to know how you bought shit, and it's totally your own fault.
Same as if you let your kid or little brother or nephew fuck around in the store.
If you don't want to password protect your purchases live with the consequences.
*furrows brow* This is such a strange thing to say. The point is that these users didn't care that their PS4 was on at the same time because they never imagined the DS4 that was controlling their Dark Souls 2 character was, meanwhile, also active on their other console.
And yeah, I do keep my passport and wallet in a safe place.
You should probably quit analogies.
The point is that these users didn't care that their PS4 was on at the same time
How are people okay with this?
When I'm using controller A, that's meant for device Z, on device X it shouldn't also control device Z. Especially when the maker officially stated that it also supports, albeit limited, device X.