I can't imagine they do. Especially with the diminished and collapsing value of the PlayStation brand (I hope Sony realizes they have to give up the brand name soon or face going under with it - the brand has very little real strength in the market anymore imo. Time to rebrand), it just seems like wrong time/place. Fat Princess is some sort of iconic character? Buzz? Patapon worlds? What, did 2 people play Patapon in total? I like Patapon, but the stretching they have to do to get characters that appeal to someone is really nuts. Are they at least going to be able to utilize Crash Bandicoot? To this day Crash is still something I associate with the PS brand, back when it was still relevant.
lol, you sound a little too retarded to add to a ignore list. I hope you post more retarded views on gaming regularly.
Anyway,
I am pretty excited about this game. Sony made gaming 'accessible' and went after people other than children and social outcasts. This gave birth to many franchises and allowed to various 3rd parties to flourish.
I hope this game will represent that. There should be 3rd party characters because that is also what PlayStation represented: freedom for 3rd party developers, freed from Nintendo's censorship. Resident Evil would have never existed if Nintendo had any say in it for example.
edit: whoops forgot the conclusion
So a Resident Evil character should be part of the game, because that is also what PlayStation stood, and stands for.