This thread has left me totally knackered.
Is Zombie Vikings made by the same guys that did Stick it to the Man? That was a great game. I'd vote for ZV.
Lol thisnoooooooo
people have shitty taste in games
I played the knack demo at a best buy and it might have been the most boring video game I've ever touched
Go do some research on Zombie Vikings. Never mind PS+, Your post is actually what's wrong with gaming in general. Judging a fucking book by its cover like some hipster.
For all you who dont know what Zombie Vikings is, heres a quick re-cap:
1-4 player co-op brawler from the creators of Stick It to The Man!
Over 40 unlockable unique weapons with names like Stinknir and Blunt Fish Trauma.
From the ps blog
I literally died laughing when I read blunt fish trauma how do people come up with such hilarious phrasing
Not since deathspank have my sides been so split
the game looks bad
This truth hurts deepGoing by Steam...the game you want never wins.
Voting sucks.
It's not about playing Knack.
It's about sending a message.
I agree. I think we should stick to Sony making the calls on this.I echo the sentiment that this is a bad idea.
What message is that? That you prefer boring platforming games over exciting games with great gameplay, as long as it's considered AAA?
Strange message indeed!
Go do some research on Zombie Vikings. Never mind PS+, Your post is actually what's wrong with gaming in general. Judging a fucking book by its cover like some hipster.
Considering there is no hype for Tearaway, I think it should be a plus title at least a month after release if it floped again
Sadly, I think Tearaway on PS4 is going to perform similarly to Puppeteer on PS3.
It really shouldn't be too much of a surprise given that they seem to have the same marketing strategy.
You can only vote if you buy Knack from PS Store first.So I just turned on my PS4 and I don't see the thing in the OP. Where is it?
Lesser known games will suffer heavily. Which is completely opposite to the ethos of P+.
No thanks. If this indeed becomes the standard... i'll probably play a lot less plus games.
A complete lack thereof?
Maybe that people have different tastes? Although it's probably to stifle the people who want retail titles. Honestly, we should be getting a mix of retail and indie games. It's ridiculous that we've only gotten three or four retail games almost two years into the console's life cycle.
Of course people have different tastes. But the fact that people factor a game's budget, sometimes exclusively, into whether or not it's for them is absolutely absurd. Indie is not a genre. Indie games can be action games, RPGs, platformers, point and click and so on. To say you don't like indie games, is the same as saying you don't like games, period. And I can't help but feel bad for gamers who are willfully missing out on some of the best games out there because of the size of the team, or the budget the game had.
Basically, you just want to think "holy crap! This game was sitting on a shelf for $60, and I just got it for "free" thanks to psplus/gwg". And sure, that would ridiculously good value for money, and I can see why you might want that, but it isn't really realistic. We're only going to get big games on these services when the publishers want to put them on there in a bid to sell dlc/advertise the next game in the series.
Approach every title with an open mind and you'll probably realize that it's still an amazing service.
I hope The Last of Us goes up there. I've beaten it on the PS3, but I want to replay it in 60fps and just can't justify re-buying a game I already own.
Lesser known games will suffer heavily. Which is completely opposite to the ethos of P+.
No thanks. If this indeed becomes the standard... i'll probably play a lot less plus games.