Unbiased Basturd
Member
Doom_Bringer said:whatever, at least its locked at 30 fps. Get used to 30 fps kids
Meh, it's up to them to ****ing learn to code and optimise their game effectively. 60 fps for the win.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[ps3] F1 Championship Edition
- Thread starter DCharlie
- Start date
Meh, it's up to them to ****ing learn to code and optimise their game effectively. 60 fps for the win.
Lord Error
Insane For Sony
We need some pictures from tracks that are not just 'regular' racing circuits. Something like Monaco that goes through city and has various environments. Monaco was the track in the TGS demo and it looked really awesome.
Gek54 said:No, this GTR2
Thanks. I didn't feel like finding a good pic.
Trust me... after you've seen GTR2 and some recent PC games even on modest hardware, as good as this F1 game looks, it's really not life changing at all.
Plus... GTR2 has 28 player online multiplayer and some of the best physics ever to grace a racing simulation. And I mean simulation, not what Gran Turismo terms "simulation".
Chittagong
Gold Member
holy crap, this game has cost a lot to develop, even the tracks are made of marble
First video (off-screen) online:
http://www.playsyde.com/news_3914_en.html
http://www.playsyde.com/news_3914_en.html
<<-- see that little blue square that I have right beside my username?
I got that when I said that this game had way too much blur, not only according to pics, but also according to a video.
And after looking at some of these pics I gotta say it again...there's too much blur! Tone it down for Pete's sake!
I got that when I said that this game had way too much blur, not only according to pics, but also according to a video.
And after looking at some of these pics I gotta say it again...there's too much blur! Tone it down for Pete's sake!
PjotrStroganov
Member
Dave Long said:
In my humble opinion GTR2 looks less lifelike than F1 Championship. I think this is mostly because of the lack of extra effects. GTR2 is very detailed yes, but it looks almost too clean in non official screenshots.
And with 28 cars even a not so moderate system has difficulty holding up a decent framerate.
mashoutposse
Ante Up
Blimblim said:
Thanks a lot. :lol @ comparisons to GTR2; the difference is pretty noticeable.
But most of us already knew that from the PSN demo.
Unbiased Basturd
Member
Flo_Evans said:hey gek how come when DL GTR2 demo it looks like this:
and not the image you posted???
The screenshot is dull because an empty pitlane does look dull. Also, the pic may not be taken at full high visual settings.
GTR2 DOES look like Gek's pics when on the right settings/hardware.
PjotrStroganov
Member
Gek54 said:
Better lighting= more lifelike I guess.
Good for you. I've heard otherwise from a buddy of mine. This was half a year ago though, so maybe his system is already mediocre.
PjotrStroganov
Member
Gek54 said:Nope, the game looks just as good during play.
Would you do us a favour and post some of your own full res screens?
I'm sure will not kill the argument, but I'm seriously interested in how the game looks on your system.
fivehorizons
Member
Blimblim said:
Nice video looks almost better than the screenshots. Whats the deal with the glitch in the pits? The car went right through the other one and that car didnt leave the pits til you did? Also your first problem was picking Button
mashoutposse
Ante Up
F1 looks significantly better than GTR2, especially in motion. F1's motion blur implementation is extremely good and captures perfectly the sense of speed of 170+mph. It looks amazing passing over the grid at 180mph.
This is before one factors in lighting, which is not even a contest.
fivehorizons said:
Nice video looks almost better than the screenshots. Whats the deal with the glitch in the pits? The car went right through the other one and that car didnt leave the pits til you did? Also your first problem was picking Button
Like how the in-game stuff looks way better than the replays lol...
Norse
Member
The game doesnt lok as good at it should for running on a next gen system.....some times I think devs are lazy as they know on a launch system anything will sell. The rain "replays" look cool, but nothing else stands out as next gen. And why are we always showing replay shots in racers? You dont play the game in replay mode, so who frickin cares if those look good. The in-game shots are what interest me.
bee
Member
game looks fairly nice, maybe this will be another motorstorm where significant features will be added to the western release? i.e force feedback , hopefully at least.
would only be a rental for me though at most, i love f1 but the cars simply have too much grip to be any fun in a game.
btw arguing over graphics in racing sims is funny as your clearly missing the point.
would only be a rental for me though at most, i love f1 but the cars simply have too much grip to be any fun in a game.
btw arguing over graphics in racing sims is funny as your clearly missing the point.
Fight for Freeform said:
It seems there is too much blur because it is a still image. If you try the game yourself you will be fascinated at how good the sense of the speed is. Although I've never been in a F1 seat but I'm sure it will look like this
The rain effect is gorgeous but I dont really care about that. It's the sense of speed that made me so interested in this game.
mashoutposse
Ante Up
Norse said:
Are you serious?
This game actually looks better in gameplay shots than in the replays...
Kleegamefan
K. LEE GAIDEN
RaijinFY said:
Forza HD
At least, last time I saw it, the game was running sub-30fps with just a couple of cars on screen...
frAntic_Frog
Member
the game looks crazy fast even for a 30-fps framerate, after watching the playsyde video.....the right amount of blur, lighting, and screen shaking when your in the cockpit view makes the game seem like ur really going at 180mph
SumGamer said:It seems there is too much blur because it is a still image. If you try the game yourself you will be fascinated at how good the sense of the speed is. Although I've never been in a F1 seat but I'm sure it will look like this
The rain effect is gorgeous but I dont really care about that. It's the sense of speed that made me so interested in this game.
I'm sorry, nothing against you, and it's not like I don't trust you, but judging from the vids, and all of these pics...it's waaaay overdone.
My PS3 should be in tomorrow and I'll see for myself...but it looks asstacular to me right now. We'll see tomorrow!
Agent Icebeezy
Welcome beautful toddler, Madison Elizabeth, to the horde!
Kleegamefan said:
it's 60fps locked now
xaosslug
Member
game looks good, thanks for the shots/impressions DCharlie!
:lol ...owned.
as an aside, why do you guys always have to bring your stupid into impression threads? Can't peeps just appreciate a game without all the "it's nice, but Y game on X console will/does look better/do it right" bullshit? Jeez.
DCharlie said:
:lol ...owned.
as an aside, why do you guys always have to bring your stupid into impression threads? Can't peeps just appreciate a game without all the "it's nice, but Y game on X console will/does look better/do it right" bullshit? Jeez.
Norse
Member
xaosslug said:
get a life...not once did I mention any other consoles. I said I expect more from a ps3 racer. And so should you. Hell, dcharlie even said he thinks the GTHD demo looks better...so, whats that say? A demo using ps2 tracks with updated ps3 car physics and graphics looks better than a game supposedly built from the ground up for the system!? Take your "cry me a river" attitude and hit the road. Insulting another console everytime a ps3 game is said to be less than stellar is pathetic.
I normally don't get into graphics arguments hereNorse said:
because honestly, you people have no clue
(Also, you should check your facts. GT:HD neither uses PS2 tracks nor assets as far as I know - and I'm not even interested. Or, indeed, using it to support an argument)
DCharlie
And even i am moderately surprised
there is more to expect from this game...
much more.
But i'm pretty happy with how the game looks - bump it up to 60fps and it'd be pretty much perfect for an F1 game.
what it does need desperately is expanded options, online, etc...
I think people are focusing on the wrong thing with their critism - this game looks more than fine... the issue with early gen games is that in terms of content and scope, they are moving backwards - not forwards. Now i appreciate content generation is difficult, but the nasty surprise of this gen for me hasn't been microtransactions is paying more for less game.
DCharlie said:there is more to expect from this game...
much more.
But i'm pretty happy with how the game looks - bump it up to 60fps and it'd be pretty much perfect for an F1 game.
what it does need desperately is expanded options, online, etc...
I think people are focusing on the wrong thing with their critism - this game looks more than fine... the issue with early gen games is that in terms of content and scope, they are moving backwards - not forwards. Now i appreciate content generation is difficult, but the nasty surprise of this gen for me hasn't been microtransactions is paying more for less game.
Well in this case (and Motorstorm's one also) It's more like japanese gamers am ****ed total. I expect these modes to be back for the european launch.