BoboBrazil
Member
Supposed to be very easy to be patched with firmware.
Stumpokapow said:Ultimately, though, it's contextual.
Consider the following C code. It's more than one line. It's clearly novel. It clearly does something interesting. It's not "generic". It's clearly very very specific. I won't tell you what it does but I'm sure a few people here have run into it before.
?
That's my point.charlequin said:You sound like Sony's sadsack Mafia lawyer. "I'm just sayin'.... are youse guys sure youse got... insurance?" *flicks lighter*
Rhindle said:That's my point.
In a situation like this, it doesn't matter whether someone in Sony's position is right or its wrong. If they're going after small shops and distributors (or, hypothetically, individual users), they win by default. The Australian shops were actually in a much better position legal position that their US counterparts would be given the lack of a DMCA-equivalent, but they folded the second the complaint arrived.
Rhindle said:That's my point.
WTH, man? I wasn't threatening the guy. I was pointing out why his argument was irrelevant, which is what we tend to waste our time doing on message boards. I'm sorry if it came across as a threat. I don't even particularly like Sony.charlequin said:Your point was to try to sound imposing and threatening in service to distant, shadowy overlords, but then to fail at doing so?
To try to be more direct here, no one cares what kind of ominous threats you can conjure up here because the very idea of Sony suing individual customers based on message board posting is utterly ludicrous. It's like trying to tell people in an oooh ominous voice "I wouldn't post on NeoGAF admitting you drove over the speed limit if I were you."
You know you can counter sue a company for Legal Fees.Rhindle said:Just an assumption that the poster doesn't have $1 million or so kicking around to mount a legal defense.
SuperAwesome said:I don't think I saw this posted...
" While many people that have received their sample and sent it off to cloners....we sent ours to a well known homebrew developer. The developer we picked showed us various homebrew applications that he had already developed for ps3 dev units, that he wants to port over to retail units. Yes, PS3 homebrew is real and will start flowing through at a steady rate as soon as next week."
SuperAwesome said:I don't think I saw this posted...
" While many people that have received their sample and sent it off to cloners....we sent ours to a well known homebrew developer. The developer we picked showed us various homebrew applications that he had already developed for ps3 dev units, that he wants to port over to retail units. Yes, PS3 homebrew is real and will start flowing through at a steady rate as soon as next week."
Zoe said:How are homebrew devs getting dev units?
Rhindle said:I wasn't threatening the guy.
LovingSteam said:Perhaps its a legit dev who also has produced homebrew on other devices?
That is what an internet alias is for!Zoe said:But wouldn't using a dev unit to develop unsigned code go against their license?
Not anymore, passed it along to a friend who's into the tech side of things and wanted to get his own look at it. I'll hopefully get it back in a week or so.charlequin said:Chrange does, apparently. :lol
Chrange said:Not anymore, passed it along to a friend who's into the tech side of things and wanted to get his own look at it. I'll hopefully get it back in a week or so.
He wants to take apart a Move wand too lol, but I haven't let him yet.
Clevinger said:for instance?
:lolcharlequin said:You sound like Sony's sadsack Mafia lawyer. "I'm just sayin'.... are youse guys sure youse got... insurance?" *flicks lighter*
Rhindle said:The point isn't whether they are going to do it or not. They're obviously very unlikely to go after individual users, given the PR fallout. The point is that your theories about the legality of the device are completely irrelevant, as are those of any of the shops selling this device. If Sony doesn't come after you, you're fine. If they do, you're fucked regardless of your theories.
It's a bit hard to imagine that someone with "Brazil" on its username is interested in this because of homebrew. :lolBoboBrazil said:Can't wait to see the homebrew apps
Brazil said:It's a bit hard to imagine that someone with "Brazil" on its username is interested in this because of homebrew. :lol
I'm kidding.
Precedent says it can even be patented...Stumpokapow said:Ought it be copyrightable?
Sony had the chance to do it right. But they've decided otherwise,phosphor112 said:In all honesty, I'm always completely torn on these matters.
I want amazing homebrew, but those things ALWAYS lead to someone copyrighting something, ...
Yeah but there was / is a trace you can follow on how things came about.marathonfool said:Keeping OtherOS would not have stopped this hack.
Zoe said:How are homebrew devs getting dev units?
Dragona Akehi said:The way other homebrew devs get units? Usually buying them secondhand from developers looking to get rid of a few.
A better question is: why do you care? Does it really matter?
Belfast said:Geez, $125? No thanks, sir. Not for what amounts to a freakin' USB stick.
Yenrot said:Will this mean anything with regards to the consoles price and the price of games? Waiting on a price cut but surely that wouldnt be too soon if this gets on sale.
Belfast said:Geez, $125? No thanks, sir. Not for what amounts to a freakin' USB stick.
Really? Gimme some links or something to back thismissile said:Yeah but there was / is a trace you can follow on how things came about.
Was thinking exactly the same.Brazil said:It's a bit hard to imagine that someone with "Brazil" on its username is interested in this because of homebrew. :lol
I'm kidding.
Hope you're not planning on using any Windows programs while developing, MS is always being sued for copyright violations, so odds are you're helping the pirates win just by using a Microsoft OS.phosphor112 said:In all honesty, I'm always completely torn on these matters.
I want amazing homebrew, but those things ALWAYS lead to someone copyrighting something, and I just can't stand for that.
After all, I am going to school to develop games.
So, now peoplo can write software to exploit the Ps3 using this code?BoboBrazil said:The shell code is out http://www.ps3exploits.com/2010/08/ps-jailbreak-shell-code/
Machado said:being a Venezuelan, I think we can pretty much say this is true for most latin american countries.
Sort of kidding.
BoboBrazil said:The shell code is out http://www.ps3exploits.com/2010/08/ps-jailbreak-shell-code/
missile said:Sony had the chance to do it right. But they've decided otherwise,
unfortunately. Instead of supporting the OtherOS, they've killed it
altogether. lol A fully supported OtherOS (incl. RSX) from the get-go and
there would be no argument for hacking the PS3 in bringing homebrew onto
the PS3. Whoever sits there at Sony having done this dick move in removing
the OtherOS will now have to face the consequences. There you go ...
motherfukkas!
I'm pretty sure that PSJailbreak is directly related to the OtherOS issue and
the lack of homebrew on the PS3. Since Sony has removed the OtherOS from the
Slim people became interested in hacking it. No? And with its entire removal
it only took half a year until the system was hacked. No? I think Sony never
thought it would happen since the system was secure for about three years.
Yeah, it was secure because no one was really trying.
So what's the cost in fixing all the sh!t, paying the lawyers, and taking
a possible loss due to piracy? What was the cost of the OtherOS again?
"But but but it cost us money and we have security concerns" am cry.
Ah c'mon, gimme a break!
phosphor112 said:I think you're just trying to justify hacking the PS3. You know software piracy destroys lots of companies. Sony's income has been mainly from software, so killing any form of "hacks" is completely legitimate as a business standpoint. They don't have the luxury of companies like Nintendo, which make a killing on both software and hardware.
Machado said:not to defend anyone but they are not forced to sell hardware at a loss. Just sayin'.
Rainier said:Hope you're not planning on using any Windows programs while developing, MS is always being sued for copyright violations, so odds are you're helping the pirates win just by using a Microsoft OS.
LovingSteam said:Actually, nobody needs to justify hacking the PS3 because doing so isn't illegal, nor should it be seen as immoral. Piracy? Yes. We have had this conversation throughout the entire thread and perhaps I'm mistaken but it seems that you're arguing that this hack shouldn't be allowed because it will lead for many to use it for piracy. Am I misreading you?
Quit trying to pretend this hack only came about because of the removal of otheros, that's bullshit and you know it.missile said:Yeah but there was / is a trace you can follow on how things came about.
plasmasd said:When I opened that site I had multiple "Congragulations, you won" yelling at me a the same time
BoboBrazil said:The shell code is out http://www.ps3exploits.com/2010/08/ps-jailbreak-shell-code/
Eiji said:Looks like an original exploit. Good luck Sony in trying to extend that Aussie injunction :lol