Bayonetta was dead Nintendo saved it,
Rayman had one of the versions finished and ready to release this month but got delayed
I would in this gen. And we're talking about Rayman here not Mass Effect or Final Fantasy or other high-profile titles.
Which people?
The most messed up thing is that NoA had Rayman as the ONLY demo in stores. What the hell is that all about? Imagine if they had a small section of Nintendo Land, like Chase Mii or a level or two of New Super Mario Bros U with Gamepad and Wii-mote for 2 people to try.
You forgot need for speed.Developpers seems to have no problem doing this for the Wii U though. See Batman and Mass Effect 3.
This could easily be remedied with a Nintendo/Apple or Nintendo/Sony console. Most on here argue that it won't happen, but I think it's highly possible in the future unless Nintendo just abandons the console realm and sticks to handhelds.
No use.If I were Nintendo I'll rethink my strategy to make my product more appealing because its business after all.
How would that work though, money is made on licensing fees, and royalties. Do they just decide to split that 50/50?
Why?crap, I don't like this news at all
Why? For all we know it'll sit on a shelf until the other two versions are done.
A remake of Zelda is always going to be more popular than a Rayman platformer.
Are you arguing that any console where a remake sold more than the 50,000 copies of Rayman Origins is the wrong console for a third party exclusive? Cause even God of War collection sold more than 700,000 copies on the PS3.
I am sure tons of hd remakes on the ps3/360 are going to outsell Rayman Legends.
Cool.
will wait for PC.
If Nintendo don't respond immediately to this, it'll be a complete act of disregard of their userbase and third-party support. Wii U's version is pretty much finished and holding them to match a multiplatform release is unacceptable.
WAKE UP, NINTENDO!
Yepthe worst news about it is the release date.
WiiU version is due to September too?
Which brings me to the thought that Nintendo needs a major shakeup in leadership.
So the game was two weeks away from release, then Ubisoft is delaying the Wii U version for 7 months for no real reason at all?
Some have posted in this thread from what I remember.
Don't want to randomly call people out though.
Yes... a few people on a message board vs. millions of people who don't have a Wii U but have a 360 or PS3.
Definitely not "smart".
I'm sorry, I missed the last part of the sentence. But consider this: why would they not make this game multiplatform from the start if it was successful on PS360? It would reduce the costs of development, it would make it come out earlier in the end on all platforms. As now we can exclude Nintendo moneyhatting Ubisoft, perhaps they saw it as an opportunity to highlight their game to Nintendo audience, who is still willing to pay full price for 2D platformers (as shown by Wii), and give it a spotlight during launch window when there isn't much competition, then port it to PS360 and sell at a price that PS360 owners who bought the original game would go for. It sounds like a reasonable plan, and delaying it the first time was even more reasonable in order not to compete with NSMBU. But what changed for the last three months? Were they so disappointed by how Wii U performed in January that they decided to delay the game just before it was about to be released?So in other words, #3, which you didn't read? The point of contention here isn't "Is Ubisoft correct?" it's "Is the very shallow analysis presented by the argument 'The PS360 versions sold 50k first month and then bargain basement ergo this is a bad decision' enough to undermine whatever private information Ubisoft has?"
I just can't get over the September delay, I KNEW Ubisoft was going to port the game to PS3/360 but to delay the Wii U version 6 months because of it, damn
My Wii U is going to collect serious dust for the next 6 months with Nintendo already doing a pathetic job supporting this system
The fact that the game was going to be released in 3 weeks makes this all the more disappointing. Bah.
yes you willOh cool, I probably don't have to buy a Wii U to play W101 anymore.
It's a channel on YouTube called HowToBasic, where a guy pretends like he's going to cook or do something simple, but he ends up making a huge mess. It's kind of funny.
Yes... a few people on a message board vs. millions of people who don't have a Wii U but have a 360 or PS3.
Definitely not "smart".
Yes, because those millions of people will be buying Rayman Legends, not GTA V or any other big AAA games coming out that month.
well here are some possibilities:
1) ubisoft actually has no idea how much their own game sold or what the platform make-up is. they are willing to pay cash for message board posters to give them this information.
2) ubisoft does know, and whatever private information they have contradicts the information you have.
3) ubisoft does know, and your information is entirely correct, but they have private projections that suggest something different about the economics of rayman legends to justify this decision, whether or not it ends up being correct in the end.
4) ubisoft is deliberately sabotaging their own company in an effort to take down nintendo on behalf of all the third parties of the world who hate nintendo for example nomura is a KNOWN sony fan boy and besides third parties said they wouldn't make games for gamecube because of the low install base but then the wii won and SURPRISE SURPRISE they changed their tune and by the way did you know that all those companies wouldn't have gone bankrupt if they made wii games i hate dudebro shooters for example but call of duty black ops 2 on wii u is a good game and
Was this the surprising third party wii u announcement ign was talking about?
Do Microsoft and Sony make statements whenever one of their exclusive turns multiformat? I've never seen any. Why should Nintendo?
There's a chance you won't need it for Bayo 2, but W101 will never go anywhere else.Oh cool, I probably don't have to buy a Wii U to play W101 anymore.
brilliant!4) ubisoft is deliberately sabotaging their own company in an effort to take down nintendo on behalf of all the third parties of the world who hate nintendo for example nomura is a KNOWN sony fan boy and besides third parties said they wouldn't make games for gamecube because of the low install base but then the wii won and SURPRISE SURPRISE they changed their tune and by the way did you know that all those companies wouldn't have gone bankrupt if they made wii games i hate dudebro shooters for example but call of duty black ops 2 on wii u is a good game and
They'll buy both or get one next month? the sales potential compared to the WiiU is very high over there.Yes, because those millions of people will be buying Rayman Legends, not GTA V or any other big AAA games coming out that month.
Yes... a few people on a message board vs. millions of people who don't have a Wii U but have a 360 or PS3.
Definitely not "smart".
What do you think the overlap is between cutesy platformer and gritty open world game is?Yes, because those millions of people will be buying Rayman Legends, not GTA V or any other big AAA games coming out that month.
A remake of Zelda is always going to be more popular than a Rayman platformer.
Are you arguing that any console where a remake sold more than the 50,000 copies of Rayman Origins is the wrong console for a third party exclusive? Cause even God of War collection sold more than 700,000 copies on the PS3.
I am sure tons of hd remakes on the ps3/360 are going to outsell Rayman Legends.
The perception of value is strong. Hard to get people to shell out full price when there's a copy sitting right next to it that is 40 dollars cheaper. I would have double dipped on ME3 on Wii U if it was the same price as 360. Just to have a game worth playing on my Wii U. For 60 dollars, though? Hell no.
I'd rather buy Windwaker than Rayman, but that's just me.They'll buy both or get one next month? the sales potential compared to the WiiU is very high over there.
What do you think the overlap is between cutesy platformer and gritty open world game is?
If Nintendo don't respond immediately to this, it'll be a complete act of disregard of their userbase and third-party support. Wii U's version is pretty much finished and holding them to match a multiplatform release is unacceptable.
WAKE UP, NINTENDO!
What do you think the overlap is between cutesy platformer and gritty open world game is?
"IT'S OVER, UBISOFT IS FINISHED, R.I.P. UBI"