I'm not debating their authority, just seems like a victimless crime. I mean, does anyone not know there is corruption in college sports?
Would you consider child labor a victimless crime? Like, if I owned a mining company and paid your aunt so that you'd work in my mine, and then be indentured to work in my friend's mine, and then when you turn 22 you have the opportunity to be paid to work in my mine...... Is this victimless?
Or, are they not victims because they're merely being used by corporations and government to entertain us with their athletic talent? Or, should the FBI not investigate because "
Everybody knows there's corruption in college sports!" Isn't that
more of a reason to investigate if everybody knows it's corrupt? This is not even considering other colleges, universities, and
students who are not the recipients of bribery and extortion and how that affects their education.
Beyond the child exploitation angle is the additional angle that government employees are being investigated for bribery, conspiracy, and wire fraud. These are federal and state funded institutions that receive huge portions of tax dollars and often report to state boards that report to state governors. Should the FBI not investigate government fraud and organized crime...? Like, what
should the FBI investigate if not organized crime in government? The FBI investigating organized crime is, like, one of its chief responsibilities, it's the only government agency that can do that.