lolRenner with dat doucheface
lolRenner with dat doucheface
He probably only wears them indoors.Are those shades even in the movie? I don't think I've seen Renner wear them once
He probably only wears them indoors.
And at night.
I guess, despite not liking them much, I get the appreciation for each Hulk movie, for Captain, for Iron Man 2...I don't fucking get Thor. The small amount of action is terribly handled. The characters are thinner than Paul Cicero's garlic. The setting is boring. There's nearly zero development for the title character. I can't find a truly redeeming quality in the whole thing other than the pretty nice special effects for Asgard.
headgear just looks dumb in movies. unless you're batman.
If he doesn't put them on in answer to somebody's suggestion that they get a mission underway, I'll be very disappointed.
Who is going to make the inevitable haters gonna hate purple glasses Renner gifs?
They're directly compromising this stand-alone film for the sake of that The Avengers film which is completely going to fuck all their properties up at once? I swear that the Avengers film is going to undo all the good will Marvel earned in the early years.
I suspect once The Avengers comes out, many will thank DC for not being as stupid as Marvel is in destroying the potential of their franchises. It was a very good thing to scrap Justice League.
Its ironic that Marvel is actually lucky that FOX and Sony are in possession of their most important franchises.
Looked fine in Captain America. The new mask is shit.
Eh, Thor's costume is pretty shit as well.
The only good one is Iron Man.
Thor felt like a big budget version of Beastmaster 2 or the He-Man movie. I enjoyed the breezy feel of it but his overnight change from spoiled brat to self-sacrificing hero was almost meaningless.
Why is it so hard to make a helmet
It'd actually be a deal with it gif.
If I recall correctly, you once said that The Avengers will bomb so hard that it will taint all the characters involved and that Marvel would be glad that X-Men and Spiderman were out of their hands and could remain viable franchises, right? I just want to get that clear because that's going to be an empirically disprovable assertion.
Right, here we are:
For the record I think you're more hyperbolic and delusional than the people who thought Avatar would be a bomb, but there's no need to argue about it. We'll be able to prove it for sure soon enough.
Reading comprehension, how does it work?
Where did I say that The Avengers would bomb? Neither of those quotes suggest that. I was (and still am) suggesting that The Avengers will cheapen the franchise of those characters involved. Much like AvP cheapened the Alien and Predator.
I love Marvel and I love all the characters, but the stills of the costumes always make them look silly. I know it will all be fine in motion though...
I like how you edited your post to be more inflammatory. Amusing backpedaling aside, I'll have a laugh at your expense when The Avengers goes on to do gangbusters and the Marvel film franchises continue to succeed while you stamp your feet in childish frustration.
What backpedaling? Show me where I ever said The Avengers would bomb. What the fuck are you talking about?
I see you're no longer contesting the long term viability of the franchises in question. And you ask me where the backpedaling is in the same breath.
I was (and still am) suggesting that The Avengers will cheapen the franchise of those characters involved.
Again, your reading comprehension needs some work.
I don't get why captain america needs a helmet when the ordinary SHIELD guys are unprotected. Maybe if he had an identity to keep or become a symbol in time of war like how it was established in his movie. Although he's helmetless in some pictures, so maybe it saves his life at one point. Suit is still goofy but looks a lot better without the helmet.
You know, I said the exact same thing when I first read this:Can somebody else please look at what is going on here?
many will thank DC for not being as stupid as Marvel is in destroying the potential of their franchises.
Its ironic that Marvel is actually lucky that FOX and Sony are in possession of their most important franchises.
You know, I said the exact same thing when I first read this:
When at first you can't explain why you say stupid shit, pretend the stupid shit you said doesn't exist.
And where in those quoted opinions of mine (that I have no problem saying that I still completely, 100% agree with now) did I say that The Avengers would bomb?
It'd actually be a deal with it gif.
If I recall correctly, you once said that The Avengers will bomb so hard that it will taint all the characters involved and that Marvel would be glad that X-Men and Spiderman were out of their hands and could remain viable franchises, right? I just want to get that clear because that's going to be an empirically disprovable assertion.
Right, here we are:
For the record I think you're more hyperbolic and delusional than the people who thought Avatar would be a bomb, but there's no need to argue about it. We'll be able to prove it for sure soon enough.
Reading comprehension, how does it work?
Where did I say that The Avengers would bomb? Neither of those quotes suggest that. I was (and still am) suggesting that The Avengers will cheapen the franchise of those characters involved. Much like AvP cheapened the Alien and Predator.
I like how you edited your post to be more inflammatory. Amusing backpedaling aside, I'll have a laugh at your expense when The Avengers goes on to do gangbusters and the Marvel film franchises continue to succeed while you stamp your feet in childish frustration.
What backpedaling? Show me where I ever said The Avengers would bomb. What the fuck are you talking about?
I see you're no longer contesting the long term viability of the franchises in question. And you ask me where the backpedaling is in the same breath.
Again, your reading comprehension needs some work.
I think that were The Avengers film to never happen, Marvel would have been more profitable developing each of the franchises as an individual property.
Unedited? This is me quoting you right now:
This gif is always useful:
That was the original and unedited part of my post! Thank you for bolding it.
You had empirical proof of the latter, last I read.
What...LOL! I can't wait for the majority of Ender's Game fans to realize that they turned Anderson into a black woman for the movie.
And you're the one complaining about reading comprehension?
What...
I haven't been paying attention to any of the news about EG.
Yes.
Then by all means please show me where I said I had empirical proof of anything yet.
It'd actually be a deal with it gif.
If I recall correctly, you once said that The Avengers will bomb so hard that it will taint all the characters involved and that Marvel would be glad that X-Men and Spiderman were out of their hands and could remain viable franchises, right? I just want to get that clear because that's going to be an empirically disprovable assertion.
.
Will that do?
Yep. Viola Davis is playing Anderson.
Ms Lee is concerned that one anonymous casting director has suggested Whitney Houston need not be played by a black actress in a biopic.
Are you unfamiliar with the future tense? I don't have box office numbers now, they don't exist. They will, though.
You were saying that once it was made clear that I held the belief that Marvel was tainting their franchises, that it was going to be an empirically disprovable assertion, yes?