so did he, untill THAT radio message
even if he had of got past, Ferrari International Assistance wouldve given him a penalty after the race to put alolso back on top
its still fitting for them
so did he, untill THAT radio message
even if he had of got past, Ferrari International Assistance wouldve given him a penalty after the race to put alolso back on top
its still fitting for them
its still fitting for them
its still fitting for them
If it's dry it'll be a good indicator of the relative pace of the teams.Sucks that it's so long until the next race. Related, how is China as a barometer for speed at other tracks? It would be nice to get an idea on how the rest of the season is going to play out.
They are... if he was defending. But he wasn't. It looked like Karthi took the line here as he would have regardless of if there was someone behind him or not. It just so happened that the rumble strip was wet, caused some wheelspin and pushed him over to the right (at least, according to him.. and before that vid was blocked, it didn't look out of the realms of possibility). Either way, it wasn't in Vettel's interest at all to cut it so close, even if Karthi made the corner stick.not saying Vettel is completely faultless here but overtaking and lapping are two different things
I don't think it was a Ferrari conspiracy at all but I do think it's also naive to think that Sauber wouldn't have considered the damage to their relationship with Ferrari winning the race might have done.
Especially given how much faster Perez was, it would have been humiliating for the works team no question.
It wouldn't be less embarrassing than McLaren losing against the Mercedes-powered Brawn GP01 in 2009, right?
Thanks.Edmond Dantès;36368584 said:If it's dry it'll be a good indicator of the relative pace of the teams.
Not according to Whitmarsh.but those are just 2 teams who happen to have merc engines, both essentially works teams, i fully expect mclaren to produce their own engines when the merc deal runs out in 2015
Edmond Dantès;36368843 said:Not according to Whitmarsh.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/01022012/66/mclaren-plans-build-own-engine.html
They're more likely to stick with Merc for the foreseeable future. A partnership with a returning Honda is also a possibility, but their own engines? Not a chance.
aww shame, sod honda, put your balls on the table whitmarsh, time to take it like a man and build your own engines
It's what Ron Dennis wanted a few years back; building their own engines and being totally self reliant. I don't know what happened to change his mind though. Maybe he realised what an effort it would be especially after the development of their road car.aww shame, sod honda, put your balls on the table whitmarsh, time to take it like a man and build your own engines
Edmond Dantès;36368949 said:It's what Ron Dennis wanted a few years back; building their own engines and being totally self reliant. I don't know what happened to change his mind though. Maybe he realised what an effort it would be especially after the development of their road car.
Edmond Dantès;36368949 said:It's what Ron Dennis wanted a few years back; building their own engines and being totally self reliant. I don't know what happened to change his mind though. Maybe he realised what an effort it would be especially after the development of their road car.
but those are just 2 teams who happen to have merc engines, both essentially works teams, i fully expect mclaren to produce their own engines when the merc deal runs out in 2015
They did exactly that for their 12C road car though.Well, the Merc engines have been consistently great as far as I can remember. It doesn't make a lot of sense for McLaren to spend a huge amount of money setting up an engines division, hiring people and funding development and research to get something that will most likely be a little worse than the Merc ones.
But wasn't McLaren pretty much Mercedes "works team", before their extensive partnership ended in Nov. 2009? Norbert Haug was also part of the crew, iirc.
You can't say Mercedes was just another engine supplier for McLaren.
This is quite odd, and a real shame. Here's hoping the replacement does an equally good job.
I've only been watching since 2011, but the Massa hate here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. He doesn't seem to be malicious in his failures, and losing a WDC in a final turn of the final race would be terrible for anyone. Then he takes a spring to the head in a freak accident. Would think he deserved a little more sympathy. Am I missing something?
I've only been watching since 2011, but the Massa hate here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. He doesn't seem to be malicious in his failures, and losing a WDC in a final turn of the final race would be terrible for anyone. Then he takes a spring to the head in a freak accident. Would think he deserved a little more sympathy. Am I missing something?
so did he, untill THAT radio message
even if he had of got past, Ferrari International Assistance wouldve given him a penalty after the race to put alolso back on top
I've only been watching since 2011, but the Massa hate here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. He doesn't seem to be malicious in his failures, and losing a WDC in a final turn of the final race would be terrible for anyone. Then he takes a spring to the head in a freak accident. Would think he deserved a little more sympathy. Am I missing something?
They did exactly that for their 12C road car though.
BBC/SKY viewing figures for this weeks race
Sky - Average 0.96m - Peak 1.5m
BBC - Average 2.70m - Peak 3.2m
But wasn't McLaren pretty much Mercedes "works team", before their extensive partnership ended in Nov. 2009? Norbert Haug was also part of the crew, iirc.
You can't say Mercedes was just another engine supplier for McLaren.
Not as bad as I expected for Sky.
Not as bad as I expected for Sky.
They'll get their arsed handed to them live vs live too. Having watched both I'll be picking the BBC footage where there's an option to do it live.just dont expect to see much higher than 1.5m, even the big premiership football matches seem to top out at 2.1m'ish
I've only been watching since 2011, but the Massa hate here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. He doesn't seem to be malicious in his failures, and losing a WDC in a final turn of the final race would be terrible for anyone. Then he takes a spring to the head in a freak accident. Would think he deserved a little more sympathy. Am I missing something?
I've only been watching since 2011, but the Massa hate here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. He doesn't seem to be malicious in his failures, and losing a WDC in a final turn of the final race would be terrible for anyone. Then he takes a spring to the head in a freak accident. Would think he deserved a little more sympathy. Am I missing something?
I'm with the BBC for that one too. I loved Crofty on Five Live but there's something really annoying about his over-exuberance when he's doing commentary for TV.Sky for race with best commentary
They'll get their arsed handed to them live vs live too. Having watched both I'll be picking the BBC footage where there's an option to do it live.
I'm with the BBC for that one too. I loved Crofty on Five Live but there's something really annoying about his over-exuberance when he's doing commentary for TV.
Besides, I miss Coulthard.
So pissed that they split up the dream team.
It's a shame that DC isn't with James Allen, but I don't think Ben Edwards is that bad.Crofty does get way too excited, but he's a million times better than the bore that's with DC now.
Massa got his sympathy, it's been what, two years almost since he came back? Formula 1 is a cut throat sport, if he doesn't prove himself this season - he's gone. imo
Ben Edwards and DC are my go to commentators for this season.
No need to wait until the end of the season.
Perez going there, mid-season, might do him more harm than good though.Fisichella