What do folks mean by "soul"? Is it one of those intangible things like "charm"?
Wall-E, The Incredibles and Ratatouille have layers upon layers of love and texture put into them.
An animated movie is not bad per definition because of it having many celebrities as voice-actors, just look at Ratatouille.
Story? definitely. Animation style? I can't see it.
You know that thread comparing old simpsons and new simpsons? its like that. Its too clean and mechanical.
As a Pixar fanboy, I thought Rango was fantastic.For what its worth, my favorite non-Pixar contemporary CG kids-oriented animated film is Rango by ILM.
Story? definitely. Animation style? I can't see it.
You know that thread comparing old simpsons and new simpsons? its like that. Its too clean and mechanical.
Bro, what?
There is nothing mechanical about the animation in The Incredibles. You are WELL MAD.
It's your opinion of course, but as someone who is an animator and has studied these films frame-by-frame, eh?The whole CGI style has no soul. Disney declaring it had made its last traditionally animated film was an awful move. Pixar is great, but I really dislike the animation of it, dreamworks, and every other studio that makes CG films. Its too perfect, too groomed, and sometimes heads into weird uncanny valley territory. Not a fan.
I love The Incredibles, but I can sort of see the issue someone might have. With CGI in general there is a disconnect with some people, sort of like how when I watch other people's TVs with that weird smoothing effect switched on it bugs the piss out of me. They can't tell the difference at all.
Has everyone forgotten this movie?
It's because of the whole "it looks uncanny valley" nonsense.Tintin will just derail the whole thread because a lot of people can't handle just how awesome it is.
Someone still had to draw everything and design everything. This is just like people saying that CGI isn't "real" animation decades ago.Ah, Tintin was brilliant, but I have trouble considering it an animated movie, per se. It was mocapped, wasn't it?
It was mocapped, but it was also heavily worked on by animators (like all mocap films).Ah, Tintin was brilliant, but I have trouble considering it an animated movie, per se. It was mocapped, wasn't it?
This, as well. Wonderful film.
^ Up there with the best from Pixar
Someone still had to draw everything and design everything. This is just like people saying that CGI isn't "real" animation decades ago.
I'll raise you.The ignorance in this thread is truly staggering.
This really is the key. Story is king. Pixar are masters at telling a great story.Pixar understands the art of storytelling, of telling it simply and truly. That's the difference for me.
Anyone here seen this? It's very impressive and I found it to be more emotionally engaging than most Pixar films.
I like how the OP lumps "all animated movies" into the CG camp.
Nice to see Persepolis and Waltz With Bashir mentioned though.
No Studio Ghibli love?
edit Scullibundooooooooooo!
Is this thread mostly focused on kids/family animated movies?
If not then I'll just leave this here:
Now I don't want to cause a thread derail, but The Prince of Egypt smacks The Lion King down so hard it falls into a chasm and gets trampled to death like the relative pussycat it is.
How and why have I not seen this yet?
No, of course it isn't. Don't let the fact that every post references children's movies confuse you. :/
Get on it.
I'm gonna, tonight. I don't suppose it's on Blu-ray? What's the best way to watch?
That's an extremely crude way of describing the storyline, and I don't know why I'm going to even try to instill any wisdom since it will likely be brushed off like most other things on the internet, but here goes.
The story is about a man keeping a promise to his deceased wife and a lonely, nature-obsessed child who enters his life by way of happenstance -- a child that he and his wife never got the chance to have. They share an adventure and Carl comes to the realization that life is worth living even once the ones you loved have left you.
If you're describing this film in the rudimentary terms you said above, I'd really hate to see your viewpoint of some of the other greatest animated films of our time.
So what you're saying is, Dreamworks sux?There are some Pixar films I like.
There are some Pixar films I don't like.
There are some non-Pixar films I like.
There are some non-Pixar films I don't like.
I absolutely love Pixar but non-Pixar stuff is fine as well sometimes.
How to Train Your Dragon, Kung Fu Panda 1 and 2, Ice Age 1, Rango, I even thought a couple of the Shrek movies were good and Puss in Boots.
Oh, when I watched Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs it was probably the most I've ever laughed watching any CG animated movie ever. That movie is great, I wasn't expecting it to be so damn hilarious.