ClaptoVaughn
Member
My only issue with the aggression level of the interview is that it's seem to taken some attention away from the actual issue at hand. This thread is evident of some of that.
It's possible for the interview to have gotten the same information (or lack thereof, given the subject is Molyneux LYING) and created discussion without being distracted by the tone of the interview itself.
I'm not saying the interviewer should have been NICE, per se. It's just that there's a middleground between kissing a dev's ass and kicking them in the balls, and the interview would have produced more productive results (or at least, fewer unproductive reactions) if the interviewer had found that middleground.
It's possible for the interview to have gotten the same information (or lack thereof, given the subject is Molyneux LYING) and created discussion without being distracted by the tone of the interview itself.
I'm not saying the interviewer should have been NICE, per se. It's just that there's a middleground between kissing a dev's ass and kicking them in the balls, and the interview would have produced more productive results (or at least, fewer unproductive reactions) if the interviewer had found that middleground.