I had 2 big problems with The Witcher 3: firstly (and more importantly but not something that can really be "fixed"): I hate the actual reasoning/lore behind The Wild Hunt. It was fucking cool when they were Ice Wraiths of the Snowocalypse. Lots of mystery, intrigue, and supernatural shit behind them.
Then you just actually meet them face to face and it's the most boring fucking shit ever |:
Don't care about "loyalty to source material", it was trite either way. Blegh. Forever a bad taste in my mouth. And the last fight just felt so underutilized and underwhelming given a specific fucking power that coulda been really amped up.
Gonna start up Hearts of Stone this weekend so I can roll right into Blood and Wine. Happy to jump back into the Witcher 3 but if they somehow did a Witcher 1 remaster (basically Witcher 3 graphics/mechanics + Witcher 1 story) that'd be the GOAT of GOATs. Witcher 3 ended up being so close to perfection but there was just enough missteps in its story that I have a permanent sour taste in my mouth.
Not sure who told you that line about the source material, but Eredin is actually an interesting character in the books. He's not the most interesting, but he deserved to be portrayed better in-game. A lot of his planned content got late into the project.
They could have been compelling. I don't think they would ever have had the moral greyness of someone like Letho from TW2, but it could have been handled a lot better.
I amnot sure if this has already been answered but how is the difficulty like? More like base game or Hearts of Stone (which was much more challenging)?
I had 2 big problems with The Witcher 3: firstly (and more importantly but not something that can really be "fixed"): I hate the actual reasoning/lore behind The Wild Hunt. It was fucking cool when they were Ice Wraiths of the Snowocalypse. Lots of mystery, intrigue, and supernatural shit behind them.
Then you just actually meet them face to face and it's the most boring fucking shit ever |:
Don't care about "loyalty to source material", it was trite either way. Blegh. Forever a bad taste in my mouth. And the last fight just felt so underutilized and underwhelming given a specific fucking power that coulda been really amped up.
But that is something that I can't ever see being "fixed".
What I would like is even more of a push away from "mob" enemies. The Witcher is best when it's hunting a singular monster or small group of monsters. A whole story behind a single wraith haunting a field or a vampire or succubus in the city. Great shit. But the whole world is just filled with hordes of endregas and ghouls and drowners that are just there to act as filler combat enemies. I'd like more substance behind their placements and the hunting around them. Yah there's the "well there's a war going on so bodies everywhere excuse" but it just feels so... gamey? In a world that strives to be well realized in so many facets, that one grates on me a lot.
Gonna start up Hearts of Stone this weekend so I can roll right into Blood and Wine. Happy to jump back into the Witcher 3 but if they somehow did a Witcher 1 remaster (basically Witcher 3 graphics/mechanics + Witcher 1 story) that'd be the GOAT of GOATs. Witcher 3 ended up being so close to perfection but there was just enough missteps in its story that I have a permanent sour taste in my mouth.
Where can the physical edition be bought in europe(online stores)?
I had 2 big problems with The Witcher 3: firstly (and more importantly but not something that can really be "fixed"): I hate the actual reasoning/lore behind The Wild Hunt. It was fucking cool when they were Ice Wraiths of the Snowocalypse. Lots of mystery, intrigue, and supernatural shit behind them.
Then you just actually meet them face to face and it's the most boring fucking shit ever |:
You know this was literally only the case in Witcher 1, right? In The Witcher 2 it was stated that The Wild Hunt is a pack of elves and that Geralt fought an astral projection in Witcher 1.
I don't believe that was a line I ran into? Might have been a Iorveth path thing. Only ever did Roche path.
I forgive you for not liking Eredin, you're cool. Roche path is the best path.I don't believe that was a line I ran into? Might have been a Iorveth path thing. Only ever did Roche path.
Witcher 3: Blood & Wine |OT| Let the White One In
I forgive you for not liking Eredin, you're cool. Roche path is the best path.
Roche is the broest of bros.
Though I feel bad for Iorveth people getting SUUUPER shafted in Witcher 3. Literally nothing in the game from that path.
This is really fucking amazing guys.
This is really fucking amazing guys.
https://abload.de/img/witcher32016-05-2720-8ksxw.png[img][/QUOTE]
Looking really good.
This is really fucking amazing guys.
Well yeah no wonder you finished in 43 hours, you didn't play most of the game.
I can't really enlighten you about the Wild Hunt, as you seem to dislike them at a fundamental level, regardless of the portrayal. All I really say this that TW3 did not handle them properly. They're not really high and mighty, and I don't think you fully understood the references and content about them from the previous games either.
oh god it's beautiful. I needed this expansion like yesterdayThis is really fucking amazing guys.
So I have S3 for my PS4 and was planning on starting it today. I got it for Xmas ...... I know "What the hell have you been doing?!"
Anyways ... is it worth/should I pick this up before starting the game?
Where can the physical edition be bought in europe(online stores)?
I don't think there's any need to pick it up BEFORE starting the game. So far as I know it is intended to fall chronologically after the events of the main game, and the other DLC, and I *think* the quality of life improvements of it will be applied to the original version as well?
Regardless, you won't be missing out on this by having started before owning it. If you decide you need more after you've played the main game, or even just a sufficiently large portion of it, you can always buy it then.
Is that a PC shot?This is really fucking amazing guys.
I was under the impression that the expansion improved things within the base game also. Is that not true?
Are those new swords from the DLC? Or are they MC Cat sword? (Great screen btw)
Is that a PC shot?
Question from users
Q: Do you have any creators you respect in Japan?
Adam&Rafal: Miyazaki-san!
Interviewer: You mean Hidetaka Miyazaki in From-Software?
Rafal: Yes. I'm hyped for "DARK SOULS III" (at this time DS3 was not available yet). In addition, I am interested in Hideo Kojima as well.
Adam: Regarding the games, I like Final Fantasy series, especially Final Fantsy VII, so I'm looking forward to "Final Fantasy VII Remake".
Q: When we play TW3, we've got some impression of Japan-ish, for example; "Seiza" (meaning sitting upright, Seiza is a very popular habit for Japanese people). When Geralt meditates he sits upright. Is that style associated with Ronin? ("Ronin" means some kind of Samurai, especially who doesn't belong to anyone or anywhere)
Rafal: In some way, I can say that the elements of Witcher-character is like a vagabond who roam the world, fighting with his sword, being confident in himself with his own moral. I think there's some similarities between the Withcer and the Ronin from the point of view of those characters.
Adam: As for Seiza, there is no references in Sapkowski's novel. I'm not sure whether or not Seiza was designed with a motif of Ronin. Geralt is reticent and not sloppy, so we made him sit uplight when he meditates in front of his sword and his portions expressing his respect.
Interviewer: Do you have a culture or a habit to sit upright?
Rafal: No, we don't. There was a thematic art work called "Respect for Opponents". So Ronin might impact on some part, I'd say.
Adam: When we decided TW3's policy of main visual, there come a lot of words related to the Ronin. Those who are reticent, have mixed feelings, take a stand on what they believe in. Those characters appear in Japanese Movie like Zatoichi or Japanese Animation.
Q: Do you have any specific favorite female character?
Rafal: With only regard to the character, Ciri. Considering to the relationship with Geralt, Yennefer.
Adam: Ciri. I think she was the most elaborated character for configuration. She treats Geralt as not only a friend but also father. She was also difficult to depict her character in the game media. Therefore I have a deep attachment to her.
Q: Everytime we go to armorer, he says "Top Notch Sword!" Why is that?
Adam: That's mistake. It was wrong from the beginning when Polish writer drew the line.
I loaded up the save to check and all I've got on my questlog were a bunch of treasure hunts, horse races and gwent quests. The map's empty of quest markers too. Oh and the Defender of the Faith quest. Never bothered to upright those shrines.
So I'm gonna disagree with you there.
This is really fucking amazing guys.
I feel like I never used Yrden effectively in combat. Outside of making Wraiths corporeal it always seemed like other enemies just shrugged off its effects.
I jumped back into the game yesterday and I still found yrden useful. I tested it against the wraith in White Orchard that guards the crypt of the viper witcher. When he teleports behind you and slashes twice, I found that without yrden I am always hit on the second strike, but it I could dodge them both and then retaliate without danger. It's just an example of course, but it's still maybe my favorite sign.Yrden (and almost all other Signs for that matter) need high Sign Intensity to have a big effect. Patch 1.10 nerfed Yrden a lot though, so now regardless of Sign Intensity, the effect is pretty minor, and thus Yrden isn't worth using much for the slowdown effect.
Well, at least he admits a mis--I exaggerated obviously.
Never mind.the combat is a clunky clusterfuck of mechanics.
Yep. CDPR are great, but they're far from flawless. Part of what makes them so great though is their willingness and desire to learn from their mistakes, as is shown in the progress they make between games. Off the top of my head, I can't think of another company who you can take three consecutive games of and see such a tremendous leap between each one.As much as I like CDPR, this circle-jerk needs to end. They're a company like any other, and they've made a bunch of mistakes with TW3.
They said that we would get the full REDKit modding tool shortly after launch. It's been a year, and all we have is the limited MODKit, which isn't very good.
They said that TW3 would be coming to SteamOS and Linux. It's been a year, and every time it gets brought up, the question is dodged. I have no idea how they thought they'd do this, as TW3 uses HLSL shaders. Converting those to SPIR-V for Vulkan isn't easy.
They said, as late as Jan 2015, that there would be no visual downgrade, and that players would be able to achieve VGX and SoD graphical fidelity. As of Jan 2015, the renderer had been changed for at least half a year already, so they knew that wasn't true, but they said it anyway.
They said that the Wild Hunt and Eredin would not be some ancient evil, but a memorable antagonist and Geralt's personal nemesis. Eredin's 5 minutes of screen time and 11 one liners of dialogue were memorable, in the worst way possible.
They said that Iorveth would be a main character and that the Scoia'tael would have a big role in the game. Yeah... the Scoia'tael are absent outside of a minor short quest, and we know that a bunch of content got cut very late.
What... what is this?Blah blah blah.
Who started cutting onions so furiously...? W-why... I...The Witcher III: Blood and Wine |OT| Something Ends, Something Begins
What did you find different about it?I love Witcher 3 and I hate fantasy games.. Funny how that works lol
This is really fucking amazing guys.
Q: Everytime we go to armorer, he says "Top Notch Sword!" Why is that?
Adam: That's mistake. It was wrong from the beginning when Polish writer drew the line.
The greatest Witcher 3 mystery is now solved. Is he saying Geralt's swords are top notch? Is he high? Is he just expressing regret and taking all those Armorsmith courses at the University of Oxenfurt? Nope, just a mistake.
I jumped back into the game yesterday and I still found yrden useful. I tested it against the wraith in White Orchard that guards the crypt of the viper witcher. When he teleports behind you and slashes twice, I found that without yrden I am always hit on the second strike, but it I could dodge them both and then retaliate without danger. It's just an example of course, but it's still maybe my favorite sign.
Do you think there's any feasible way of arriving at BaW after both WH and HoS and be at the minimum level? I love the challenge, and in TW3 I'm afraid that it diminishes quite significantly with a level gap.
EatChildren, are you rocking any ini config tweaks for those screens?This is really fucking amazing guys.
Honestly I hope they never fix it, it's pretty much as endearing as "spoony bard" at this point. Just makes no sense but that's the way it is.
Damn. Is that a signs build? Heavy armor suggests otherwise, but I don't remember it being that useful when I played it at release. Then again, it was a year ago, so...Wraiths have Yrden as an official weakness though. But even against them, the effect is reduced a lot compared to what it used to be. Other enemies have slowdown resistances, so those get subtracted from your already slow slowdown percentage. And that doesn't leave much of a slowdown effect.
Like take a look at this and see what Yrden was capable of:
http://gfycat.com/FelineShadyGermanshorthairedpointer#
Bah. Lost about how to approach this. Would've been so simple if the recommended level was 35.You can't really avoid quest EXP. The best you can do is fight the least amount of random fights, but they don't make up significant EXP anyway.
The difficulty in TW3 being low level is just artificial, where red skull enemies (6+ levels than Geralt) will get high multipliers for health, damage and resistances. So, you're basically fighting the same AI, but it just takes 10x longer to kill, and you will be dead in one hit.
That's not to say that red skull enemies can't be beat reasonably if you have a strong build, but it's just tedious more than challenging.
This is really fucking amazing guys.
Now that I'm done with the quotes, some question of my own guys.
Do you think there's any feasible way of arriving at BaW after both WH and HoS and be at the minimum level? I love the challenge, and in TW3 I'm afraid that it diminishes quite significantly with a level gap. I have an end-game file of a level 36 Geralt, and that's before HoS, so that really won't do for BaW if I want some difficulty.
Damn. Is that a signs build? Heavy armor suggests otherwise, but I don't remember it being that useful when I played it at release. Then again, it was a year ago, so...
Bah. Lost about how to approach this. Would've been so simple if the recommended level was 35.
So I wouldn't worry too much about the level difference and resulting challenge for B&W, but that's me. I'm going in at 39 having finished HoS.
EatChildren, are you rocking any ini config tweaks for those screens?
I need to look into some of those before release. I feel like I still get a bit of pop-in and not great lighting/shadows on stuff far ahead, but I'm playing on 1440p ultra. Also I'm wondering if that new bear armorhas hairworks on the fur, and if it does will it be enabled if hairworks are set to only Geralt.
Looks so good can't wait.
Can you confirm or deny if you can actually go on that much advertised mountain in Toussaint? Think they said it is the tallest mountain in the witcher world so it would be a same to just be there for decoraton.
BaW's recommended level is 34+. BaW adds a new menu option where lower level enemies can scale to Geralt's current level, so every random fight should be decent enough. Of course, this also means that you'll get more exp from them lol. You might have to come up with your own handicaps if you want some extra challenge.
Yeah. I'm sitting at level 45 XD