Bizarro Sun Yat-sen
Banned
I like how the Dissidia picture is JUST blurry enough that I can't quite make out the names of the interviewed producer and director.
DCharlie said:wow - they held off announcing FF7 ? I'm guessing this Sony fair really is going to be megaton central.
it would be so awesome if it's coming *o*
Shiokawa.Bizarro Sun Yat-sen said:Wait, it looks like the producer is Yoshinori Kitase. Still dunno about the director though.
DCharlie said:would prefer FF7-2 - i already know what happens in FF7....
I'm starting to sound like a broken record here, but Kitase said back in '05 that the Compilation of FFVII was going to conclude in a fantastic way, "something that will have the fans excited" but they were keeping it under wraps for the time being due to early development.
TreIII said:Banpresto's a rather small developing team, that's not exactly swimming in money, though they do have enough to take care of themselves. Why you thought that they were going to immediately jump on the HD/PS3 bandwagon (if you didn't know about SRW OGs already, which has been in development for at least a year and some change), is beyond me.
Besides, the way Banpresto usually operates is to focus predominantly on the "majority leader" console. It's always been their MO, whether it was the Nintendo consoles (8-16bit and GB) through the early part of SRW's life, to Saturn and moreso the PSX during the 32bit era and the PS2 for the last few years.
So again, I really don't see why all the hub-bub is about now. If Banpresto was really all about the power, chances are, they wouldn't have stuck with the PS2 for these last few years like they did. Their interests lie mainly with reaching the largest demographic and keeping their dev costs down as much as possible, and for right now, the PS2 is where it's at, and I wouldn't be surprised to see at least one Wii game come around soon enough.
I wonder what will Konami do with Winning Eleven 11
DCharlie said:what happened to that dude who kept saying the PS3 version was the real next gen version, it was miles better than the X360 version and it would be out in Jan 2007 because of the wording of the exclusivity?
The WE games now sound stupid - WE11... :/
Blablurn said:how come that some people are asking for FF VII?
Was there some kind of announcement?
Jonnyram said:Winning Eleven ^2
StevieP said:DCharlie's playing with you all. Stop getting your hopes up
Blablurn said:It hurts :3
Eteric Rice said:I hope they do. I want SRW without having to buy another console. :|
Banpresto's a rather small developing team, that's not exactly swimming in money, though they do have enough to take care of themselves. Why you thought that they were going to immediately jump on the HD/PS3 bandwagon (if you didn't know about SRW OGs already, which has been in development for at least a year and some change), is beyond me.
Besides, the way Banpresto usually operates is to focus predominantly on the "majority leader" console. It's always been their MO, whether it was the Nintendo consoles (8-16bit and GB) through the early part of SRW's life, to Saturn and moreso the PSX during the 32bit era and the PS2 for the last few years.
So again, I really don't see why all the hub-bub is about now. If Banpresto was really all about the power, chances are, they wouldn't have stuck with the PS2 for these last few years like they did. Their interests lie mainly with reaching the largest demographic and keeping their dev costs down as much as possible, and for right now, the PS2 is where it's at, and I wouldn't be surprised to see at least one Wii game come around soon enough
neo2046 said:
speedpop said:Thanks neo for scans again.
:O @ FF:CC
Nice pic. Clouds do resemble Skies of Arcadia slightly. Good or bad thing? :lol
neo2046 said:FFCC Wii ............
I meant the clouds in the picture. Resembles Skies of Arcadia a bit in the way they are layered.zoukka said:Cloud? Where ? Or do you comment on something older than last page ?
creamsugar said:
The mouselike pointer is nice.Acosta said:Wii is region coded. A non OG for Wii means that it wouldn´t be released out of Japan, so you would would need a second system no matter what (at least you have a Japanese system).
I don´t expect Banpresto to jump so soon to HD, especially as they have been delaying OG non-stop. They have worked on all type of systems this generation so I suppose they will touch Wii soon or later.
But Wii doesn´t offer anything that could be really profited for a SRPG, so I don´t have any special desire of seeing a Super Robot Wars for it. Probably it would be like the actual PS2 offerings. Is that a desirable thing? even for Wii fans?
Even in PS3/360 you can have different budgets, not every game is going to cost millions more just because a improvement of the definition and more detail. With a PS3 Super Robot Wars Banpresto could feel they need to offer things as HD anime combat sequences, an improvement in the models, more detailed maps... Small details that don´t change the core of the game but are nice to watch and feel as a improvement, the same way the offered voices and improved graphics for PS2 (don´t know if PSone versions had voices, started playing SW with a Japanese PS2).
You can´t expect studios as Banpresto or Nippon Ichi to profit all the possibilities of a PS3, like they didn´t profit all the possibilities of PS2. But a more powerful system will make them to work a bit harder to improve the visuals. This is what I want, what I would like to see, I believe is fair to express my personal take on this.
AC6 looks hot! It'll be my first since AC4. WTF @ Wii game art, I don't even want to know what's going on.creamsugar said:
neo2046 said:
Acosta said:You can´t expect studios as Banpresto or Nippon Ichi to profit all the possibilities of a PS3, like they didn´t profit all the possibilities of PS2. But a more powerful system will make them to work a bit harder to improve the visuals. This is what I want, what I would like to see, I believe is fair to express my personal take on this.
neo2046 said:
SolidSnakex said:WTF at the game at the bottom at? The first image is really messed up.
It probably won't have online since Itahana said he's concentrating on the single-player even more than RoF is:Bo130 said:Doesn't mention online, does it ?
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=31595381UP: What's the direction you have for the title? It seems more like a real adventure game.
TI: With Crystal Bearers, there's a much more action-oriented take on the Final Fantasy series. The key difference between the original Crystal Chronicles and also Ring of Fates, is that that kind of continues on the tradition of multiplayer cooperation and working together to further the adventure, whereas Crystal Bearers concentrates more on solo play and action.
:loljj984jj said:WTF @ Wii game art, I don't even want to know what's going on.