Has the PC version of Titanfall been 100% confirmed as Origin only yet? (ie, No Steam)
Nope, but it's going to be Origin only.
Has the PC version of Titanfall been 100% confirmed as Origin only yet? (ie, No Steam)
Has the PC version of Titanfall been 100% confirmed as Origin only yet? (ie, No Steam)
Nope, but it's going to be Origin only.
What?? I haven't been following the details of this game, is this seriously going to be peer to peer crap? I'm not even bothering with this game if that is the case.
Has the PC version of Titanfall been 100% confirmed as Origin only yet? (ie, No Steam)
It's using the same servers as the XOne.
Yeah I know, I just want to hear them confirm it. =/
It's pretty damn common for games that support the 360 controller, I have no idea why people are making news out of this. BF3 and BF4 have aim assist on controllers for example.Isn't it common for PC games with Xbox pad support to include aim assist when using that pad?
It's not like an aim assisted pad is more precice than mouse/kb. Aim assist doesn't offer a competitive advantage.
Shadowfall can be possible without aimassist because every player have the same input method.
PC gaming had been always based on options and possibilities. Controller/comfy/TV players are raising every year and PC gaming must offer a place where they can play. Aim assist is a must when controllers play against mouses. And there is nothing wrong with it.
Duke Nukem 3D had aimassist in PC playing with keyboard a few decades ago. Same for Doom. What do you think about that?
Sounds about right. I'm sticking with KB/M tho. Unless Traversal is /really/ key in this game. idk
You havent read the thread I guess. People were talking about how in Crysis 2 people were using the controller auto aim applied to mouse aiming.Some pretty melodramatic responses in here to this. Why would you be bothered by controller users getting something to help them out a bit? You still realise that you'll be mopping the floor with them if you use KB&M. Unless you're just crap with the KB&M and that's why you're all worried...
Sounds like a good extra as sometimes I just wanna kick back and play some games with a controller. I don't see how that spells the decay of gaming or ruins the game at all, but a thread ain't good without some tears being shed.
If you have to reach back to when games were technically limited such as doom then you have failed in your argument.Yep. Not every game needs to be an aiming game, as in point-and-click. It can still be skill-based via movement.
Mirrors edge worked really well with mouse and keyboard.High speed traversal is better on Kb/m anyway.
It's pretty damn common for games that support the 360 controller, I have no idea why people are making news out of this. BF3 and BF4 have aim assist on controllers for example.
This would be interesting if there would be separate servers or playlists for controller only gamers.
That was during the beta, because crytech didn't turn it off for mouse aiming. As I said before PC BF3/BF4 have auto aim.You havent read the thread I guess. People were talking about how in Crysis 2 people were using the controller auto aim applied to mouse aiming.
If that's true, then I'm amazing with the controller.Err.. I don't think so.
This is actually pretty cool and furthers my bafflement into why no one has even attempted to come up with a comfortable, small form, mouse based control solution. Something like a bluetooth mouse with 7 buttons and a Nunchuck with 3.
You havent read the thread I guess. People were talking about how in Crysis 2 people were using the controller auto aim applied to mouse aiming.
If you have to reach back to when games were technically limited such as doom then you have failed in your argument.
Well yeah, obviously on paper you can objectively prove that joysticks are a less effective input method than KB/M.
I can't speak for others, but for me it's only about personal preference in regards of ergonomics. I will always prioritize gamepad because my hands feel more relaxed.
Let it go dude, EA are not going to let their biggest release of the year appear on their rivals digital distribution platform.
You havent read the thread I guess. People were talking about how in Crysis 2 people were using the controller auto aim applied to mouse aiming.
If you have to reach back to when games were technically limited such as doom then you have failed in your argument.
Mirrors edge worked really well with mouse and keyboard.
Well yeah, obviously on paper you can objectively prove that joysticks are a less effective input method than KB/M.
I can't speak for others, but for me it's only about personal preference in regards of ergonomics. I will always prioritize gamepad because my hands feel more relaxed.
It's not unfair against people who choose to use an inferior method of control input. Letting them cheat isn't cool.
I never said it shouldnt happen. If people want to use controllers on PC against mouse than go for it. But how good is a peripheral if it has to be slathered with compensation for its limitations? As long as those players are on the other team, im fine with it.I have read the thread actually. Pretty sure someone said it was unintended glitch and they removed it instead of fixing the issue. I imagine Respawn will be trying not to leave any glitches in and nothing as game breaking as that, fingers crossed. So other than a glitch in Crysis 2, what other reasons are there that this shouldn't happen? lol
If movement is such an issue then Keyboard and mouse is even better suited. Go watch all the jump trick videos in Quake 3 or Tribes.The best shooters have always been about movement. One of the reasons Halo 4 is so poorly received compared to other games in the series is because its level design doesn't empower the player to move as freely as they did in other games. Movement is a big deal in first-person games of any kind--the biggest. It's literally the most important aspect. Pointing and shooting is a subgenre of a larger mechanical system.
I'm sure you'll learn to get over it mate - I'm more than happy that more people can play and be competitive rather than using a control method which doesn't work for them. If you want to use auto-aim, you're more than welcome to pick up a controller yourself.
If movement is such an issue then Keyboard and mouse is even better suited. Go watch all the jump trick videos in Quake 3 or Tribes.
I never said it shouldnt happen. If people want to use controllers on PC against mouse than go for it. But how good is a peripheral if it has to be slathered with compensation for its limitations? As long as those players are on the other team, im fine with it.
If movement is such an issue then Keyboard and mouse is even better suited. Go watch all the jump trick videos in Quake 3 or Tribes.
If you have to reach back to when games were technically limited such as doom then you have failed in your argument.
I'd rather be responsible for my own successes than let the computer do some of the playing for me. Otherwise, I might as well download an aimbot.
Battlefield 3 and 4 has some aim assist on the PC right? I was pretty sure it did, but because of gaffers I am now doubting myself.This changes everything. Was already planning on double dipping, with the XB1 version being my main platform. Now I feel much more comfortable about the PC version. I already played BF3 and I still play BF4 on PC with a controller, so this is certainly good news for me.
And people saying CoD was never meant to be played competitively...
CoD4 was pretty competitive on PC. (Also the last CoD to not split the community with DLC on PC.)
Why? It makes shooters play a lot smoother.Controller auto-aim needs to stop being a standard.
Sounds about right. I'm sticking with KB/M tho. Unless Traversal is /really/ key in this game. idk
Have you played Tribes on PC?depends on map traversal.
Shooting will still have the edge on KB/M, however map traversal (especially with the jetpack vertical element) will always be dominated by thumbsticks on a controller. Unless people still like moving around in 3D space using only 4 directions tied to WASD. Give me 360 degree freedom of movement any day.
Battlefield 3 and 4 has some aim assist on the PC right? I was pretty sure it did, but because of gaffers I am now doubting myself.
Will they be able to play against KB/M users by default? Or will they have their own segregated servers, which are separate but equal?
Have you ever played any tribes games? Or even Planetside 2? You are wrong.Shooting will still have the edge on KB/M, however map traversal (especially with the jetpack vertical element) will always be dominated by thumbsticks on a controller.
Try doing these on a thumbstick.. Also, even if a thumbstick was somehow better at 'map traversal', the difference in aiming between a mouse and a thumbstick is so big that KB+M would still have a massive advantage.depends on map traversal.
Shooting will still have the edge on KB/M, however map traversal (especially with the jetpack vertical element) will always be dominated by thumbsticks on a controller. Unless people still like moving around in 3D space using only 4 directions tied to WASD. Give me 360 degree freedom of movement any day.
Well I take back my previous posts then. Seems like I will fare just fine with controller on Titanfall PC then.No, Battlefield doesn't have any controller aim assist on PC.
Will be modded out in the first hour of the game being live. Don't need none of that nonsense.