• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Trump: Healthcare bill will be revised to gain GOP support for Thursday vote

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iolo

Member
My Republican Representative (LoBiondo) has posted on Facebook that he will be voting no.

This is important info — he is considered a moderate, along with David Young who also just came out as no. That is not even counting the Freedom Caucus.

Normally a bill would be pulled if they can't whip enough support but I think they are scared of Trump 's reaction if they pull it — this actually has a chance of being voted down on the floor
 
This is important info — he is considered a moderate, along with David Young who also just came out as no. That is not even counting the Freedom Caucus.

Normally a bill would be pulled if they can't whip enough support but I think they are scared of Trump 's reaction if they pull it — this actually has a chance of being voted down on the floor

I wish we were in a parliamentary system where this scenario would trigger a new election.

is there any up to date tracking of no votes?

At this point it would be easier to track yes votes which probably just consists of Paul Ryan.
 

Zenner

Member
This bill is just for the "replace" part, right? It's independent of any "repeal" actions?

So we could end up with a repeal, and no replacement, if I understand that right.
 

BatDan

Bane? Get them on board, I'll call it in.
That annoying feeling when people say to call your representative about this, but your rep is Paul Ryan.

My district better not sleep in on 2018, we got to kick that bastard out.
 

IrishNinja

Member
so, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen has pledged to vote no, no word from Rep. Curbelo in my local scene

Hahahaha, wtf?!

What do they think is going to happen? There are too many republicans on record as of this afternoon saying that they are voting against this thing. It currently (as of this moment) has zero chance at passing? Why play chicken now?!

didn't you watch the last election? STATISTICS MEAN NOTHING™

The WH doesn't have the political will to back up that kind of ultimatum. They'll cut and run and blame it on somebody else.

That seems to be the desired outcome for Trump- leave things as is and then gloat and blame Obama and Ryan at every piece of bad news.

No Plan B = Let Obamacare kill itself so Trump can be like, "See, you voted no, not my fault."

It is so obvious.

didn't he quite literally say as much last week? yeah, that's pretty clearly the plan
it'll play to his insane base, but everyone else is gonna witness that giant L

I just can't believe this bill isn't passing because it's not horrible enough for some old white men

you ever talk to tea party folks (or libertarians) about healthcare reform, much less other social services? it's a lot easier to believe if you've heard the rhetoric
 
No. It will rot on the vine.

Obamacare was always meant to be a living, breathing form of legislation that would be improved upon over time. Mistakes would be corrected. Eventualities would be worked around. However, the Republicans have other plans. Never give an inch and never try to improve. It's the primary reason Obamacare is showing some real strain right now. There is an active Republican campaign of watching it die while looking the other way.

Without federal support, it will not. It will get worse and their "Obamacare is failing" narrative becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The only hope is that voters remember who it was that had a chance to avoid it happening.
The CBO said it would stabilize over time.
 

Bishman

Member
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/koch-brothers-obamacare-house-republicans-236389

Koch network pledges to defend Republicans who vote against GOP health bill.

Two Koch groups are starting a 'seven-figure' reserve fund to protect bill opponents from political harm.


The Koch brothers' network of well-funded outside groups says it will spend millions to protect Republicans who oppose the party's health care bill from political fallout.

Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Partners, the Koch network's big-budget grassroots activism and advertising groups, are teaming up to create a "seven-figure" reserve fund to support lawmakers who buck President Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan on the health care vote, as the threat of primaries looms over some opponents of the bill. The Koch groups will spend the money on paid media, direct mail and grassroots canvassing.

Freedom Partners called the GOP bill "Obamacare 2.0" and said it falls short of truly repealing the 2010 law.

“Republicans have been promising to fully repeal Obamacare since it became law. This bill doesn’t do that," said James Davis, the executive vice president of Freedom Partners. "We will stand with lawmakers who keep their promise and oppose this legislation — and work toward a solution that reduces costs and provides Americans with the relief they need and deserve.”

The move provides political cover for members of the House Freedom Caucus and other conservatives who want to vote against the bill. Trump allies have threatened to try and unseat Republicans who vote against the president's agenda, and Trump himself said he was "coming after" House Freedom Caucus chair Mark Meadows during a meeting on Tuesday.

GOP is fighting within themselves. ROFL
 
This bill is just for the "replace" part, right? It's independent of any "repeal" actions?

So we could end up with a repeal, and no replacement, if I understand that right.

No, this bill includes both the repeal and the replacement. There are a number of Republicans who are opposed to an outright repeal or a repeal with a time-limit to give them time to pass a replacement, so the way they get the most people on board is one bill that both repeals and replaces.

There actually might be more opposition if you tried to bring a repeal-only bill right now. The way a repeal bill would have to be written, they would get only 1 reconciliation bill to do it this fiscal year, so if the Republicans used their only shot until 2018 to repeal PPACA, they would have zero chance of replacing it until they write next year's budget.
 

IrishNinja

Member
I still think this bill passes the house, and something similar passes the senate.

Likewise. There will be changes on the margins, but this is pretty much the shape of it.

*sigh*
always looking for the silver lining (even when people would literally die from this fuckery), best i can come up with is anti-trump momentum by 2020 getting us someone who just gives us medicaid for all or a likewise proper form of healthcare
 
I'm not so sure any version of this will pass-



The bill needs 216 votes to pass, and none of the Democrats in the House have said they would vote for it. That means no more than 21 Republicans can vote against the bill, if it is to pass. Of the 237 Republicans in the House …

149
Support the bill or lean yes

44
Undecided or unclear

16
Concerns or lean no

28
No


Updated today.

In retrospect it's pretty amazing that Obamacare ever passed, the way our system is set up.
 

Chumley

Banned

evlhnk.gif
 

Maxim726X

Member
I still think this bill passes the house, and something similar passes the senate.

Something similar will not pass the Senate.

The margin is much tighter, and the revisions that I'm reading are terrible for moderates who had reservations about the bill we read last week.
 

Lo-Volt

Member

I don't know why I can't believe that, but I can't believe that.

"Optional" substance abuse disorder services in a country where heartland regions are writhing in the opioid epidemic. "Optional" newborn and pediatric services, so let's just not have kids. "Optional" laboratory services so I guess you don't really need to know why you're in pain. "Optional" hospitalization. How does that count as healthcare at all?

If you're a moderate Republican in a seat where Trump had a hard time in the general election, a bill like that somehow makes it through both houses, and the Indivisible chapter members in your district read the fine print after the Faustian bargain is done... like, how do you sell that kind of bill?
 
I don't know why I can't believe that, but I can't believe that.

"Optional" substance abuse disorder services in a country where heartland regions are writhing in the opioid epidemic. "Optional" newborn services, so let's just not have kids. "Optional" laboratory services. "Optional" hospitalization. How does that count as healthcare at all?

I thought she linked an article from The Onion or something.

"Can we just bar poor people from entering hospitals? Even if they work there or are delivering pizza."
 

btrboyev

Member
What time is the vote suppose to take place?

There is no set time. They will vote when they think they have the votes. They could wait all day.

It's amazing that some of the no votes are because the bill still does too much to help people, not because it's a terrible bill.
 
I don't know why I can't believe that, but I can't believe that.

"Optional" substance abuse disorder services in a country where heartland regions are writhing in the opioid epidemic. "Optional" newborn and pediatric services, so let's just not have kids. "Optional" laboratory services so I guess you don't really need to know why you're in pain. "Optional" hospitalization. How does that count as healthcare at all?

I think you might be misunderstanding what they're saying; Republicans want people to have the option to buy very cheap, bare-bones insurance plans that are basically catastrophe-only. They don't cover anything except the "this will bankrupt me otherwise" situations and come with very low premiums. Under Obamacare you couldn't buy such a plan - in order to qualify as "having insurance" your plan had to include lots of things that some people insisted they'd never need ("Why do I have to pay for pediatric care when my children are grown and long-gone?").

From a libertarian perspective it makes sense, because it's saying consumers willing to take the risk (or who say they have the cash reserves to pay for other situations) should be able to. The objection of course is that lots of people will take the cheapest possible plan, then simply not pay after they have to go to the emergency room for a $5,000 infection.
 
I don't know why I can't believe that, but I can't believe that.

"Optional" substance abuse disorder services in a country where heartland regions are writhing in the opioid epidemic. "Optional" newborn and pediatric services, so let's just not have kids. "Optional" laboratory services so I guess you don't really need to know why you're in pain. "Optional" hospitalization. How does that count as healthcare at all?

If you're a moderate Republican in a seat where Trump had a hard time in the general election, a bill like that somehow makes it through both houses, and the Indivisible chapter members in your district read the fine print after the Faustian bargain is done... like, homw do you sell that kind of bill?

They want to go back to a time where you could buy a catastrophic plan for $5 a month that doesn't cover anything. Remember around the time the ACA went into effect and thousands of people lost those plans and republicans were outraged? A return to that shit.

He's making the bill worse to appeal extremists, which loses him the moderates and ensures even if it passes the House it won't pass the senate. It's really like Trump operates in a world where nothing exists outside of the room he's in. He goes into a room to negotiate with the FC, meanwhile everything he's giving them is toxic to everyone outside the room. So he "wins" some of the folks in the room but ultimately makes no progress in terms of the vote count due to losing everyone else.

This guy is legit stupid.
 

Iolo

Member
What time is the vote suppose to take place?

Well, you could take the 2003 Medicare Part D vote as an example.

When the vote was called at almost 3 a.m., voting Democrats stood unanimously with 22 Republicans in opposing the legislation. Had the vote been gaveled down in the customary 15 minutes, the bill would not have passed. So the Republican leadership held the vote open for a record three hours while attempting to change the outcome — through intimidation and other tactics that, again, violated House rules. Finding itself with a narrow lead at 5:53 a.m., the Republican leadership immediately brought the vote to a close..."

source: http://m.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/4/821644/-
 

Macam

Banned
I don't know why I can't believe that, but I can't believe that.

"Optional" substance abuse disorder services in a country where heartland regions are writhing in the opioid epidemic. "Optional" newborn and pediatric services, so let's just not have kids. "Optional" laboratory services so I guess you don't really need to know why you're in pain. "Optional" hospitalization. How does that count as healthcare at all?

If you're a moderate Republican in a seat where Trump had a hard time in the general election, a bill like that somehow makes it through both houses, and the Indivisible chapter members in your district read the fine print after the Faustian bargain is done... like, how do you sell that kind of bill?

Seems consistent with what I'm seeing reported elsewhere:

IMG_4522.jpg

IMG_4523.png


This is the Freedom Caucus, so it's the far right wing of the Republican Party (which is already a far right party in itself). They're the strongest block of No votes as they see the Trumpcare bill as basically "Obamacare lite".

Call your Congressmen, folks.
 

Maxim726X

Member
They want to go back to a time where you could buy a catastrophic plan for $5 a month that doesn't cover anything. Remember around the time the ACA went into effect and thousands of people lost those plans and republicans were outraged? A return to that shit.

He's making the bill worse to appeal extremists, which loses him the moderates and ensures even if it passes the House it won't pass the senate. It's really like Trump operates in a world where nothing exists outside of the room he's in. He goes into a room to negotiate with the FC, meanwhile everything he's giving them is toxic to everyone outside the room. So he "wins" some of the folks in the room but ultimately makes no progress in terms of the vote count due to losing everyone else.

This guy is legit stupid.

Yep. I can see him literally patting himself on the back: 'Welp, got them on board! Now I just have to do the same thing again with the Senate!' not realizing that he would make changes that would anger the FC after that... Going back to square zero

He really is a moron.
 
Yep. I can see him literally patting himself on the back: 'Welp, got them on board! Now I just have to do the same thing again with the Senate!' not realizing that he would make changes that would anger the FC after that... Going back to square zero

He really is a moron.

He gets to try and claim to his base that it wasn't him that failed, but Ryan and McConnell.

And they'll believe it.
 

Dierce

Member
Republicans strive at normalizing mediocrity. It is the only way that their cancerous ideology can attract idiots other than being absolute racists.

Want people to hate the federal government, then lets run it as incompetently a possible. Easy!

Want people to be enslaved to health insurance companies. Lets make all health plans as bad as possible so that people will end up paying more money to get worse coverage. But free market, they can't complain cause capitalism! Socialism would kill you, just look at how incompetent the federal government is.

And the republican circle of evil continues.
 
He gets to try and claim to his base that it wasn't him that failed, but Ryan and McConnell.

And they'll believe it.

Fine by me.

Best-case scenario: AHCA dies a miserable death. Trump blames Ryan for the shitshow, turning his entire base against him. Shortly thereafter, Trump & Pence are charged for treason and locked up. Now the base is stuck with Ryan, who couldn't make a sandwich if he had a piece of ham and two slices of bread.

Well, I can dream about it at least. =/
 

Tubie

Member
The GOP finally realizing they are dealing with peoples lives, and if there is one thing that will get people to vote (even on gerrymandered districts) is facing fucking hardships or loss due to healthcare coverage or lack of it.

It was so easy to shout "obamacare is bad" for 8 years, but now its their turn to bring out something better and more affordable, and that's just not possible.

They sabotaged Obamacare, but in the end they just sabotaged themselves because the only other options that makes sense if you want to improve things is medicare for all or single payer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom