bahahahaha[Nintex] said:looks okay-ish but there's not enough going on in the background. It's not epic or immersive enough so let me fix that for you.
danmaku said:
Alright pal, you tell me what looks "bad" about these screenshots. The fact it looks this good and run at 60fps on consoles is pretty amazing...fucking jaded people these days...French said:
We have a winner[Nintex] said:
Fezan said:
Thats the problem, what are these supposed to do?Always-honest said:
Anteater said:
I didn't know a game grounded in the real world is supposed to have red guns and colorful suits and shit.Imp the Dimp said:
I don't believe you.RedSwirl said:
Examples from Modern Warfare 2. And this game will have the same kind of color palette:Imp the Dimp said:
Marleyman said:
When dealing with imitating reality you make choices those choices are an art style.ultron87 said:
What... what are you talking about?Dilly said:
You know pretty much all games use baked lighting, right?. Only a few games like the ones using the CryEngine or the ones with some sort of time lapse (day-night stuff like GTA, RDR, etc..) feature all real time lighting. And even then, most games with baked lighting also feature real time lighting for stuff that moves or even have real-time lighting for everything near your character in a certain area. The Modern Warfare games do that as well (that's why you can see shadows pop-up when you get close to some stuff in camera-mode, they usually prevent those shadows popping in when you're playing by "hiding" them with other stuff).NBtoaster said:
Actually, most lunch games would probably run at less than 60FPS because the developers are still not used to the platform, plus they also want to try and push out the best visuals they can so gamers buy it just because it looks pretty.Dilly said:
i have a poster of a top floor manhattan mansion sitting behind my computer in my bedsit. when i'm jerking it to degenerate porno and naive facebook acquaintances, my imagination is whisked off to a world of american psycho champagne power fantasies. atleast until the smell catches up.Draft said:
Mik2121 said:Examples from Modern Warfare 2. And this game will have the same kind of color palette:
http://www.themodernwarfare2.com/images/mw2/maps/favela-prev.jpg
http://www.themodernwarfare2.com/images/mw2/maps/terminal-prev.jpg
Troll fail?
Why do they bother you? They are usually of quite good quality.NBtoaster said:
With "gray filter" I guess you mean less contrast. Some areas far from the gameplay environments do indeed look a bit gray, but that's probably volumetric fog to achieve a better (?) depth effect, and make it feel like the environments have larger scale than they do.Imp the Dimp said:
That depends on the lightmap texture size. And even then, they affect dynamic shadows if you're in the range where real time shadows kick in. For example, you can have a building and a road, and have the building cast shadows on the road and have it all nicely baked on a shadow map. But when you walk into the shadow, you can still see your weapon getting darker (because the sun stopped hitting it directly). That means there are real time shadows on dynamic objects.NBtoaster said:
Mik2121 said:
Recent as in, since at least a year and a half ago?NBtoaster said:
I've been using UDK for quite a while now (I do 3D environments, btw).No.Judging by IW and MW hate,they should dump those 60fps,get from 16ms of rendering budget to 33ms and than spend those ms in highest quality motion blur,dof and water.They would still be left with more than half of it.Just shows you how Godly this engine is optimized.Dr Eggman said:
