LegendofDragoonLives
Member
That was WB? Ughh... Man that nice one off was fucked by padding it so much.Trilogy?
Man fuck WB. They did this shit with The Hobbit too. The executives there don't have a fucking clue.
That was WB? Ughh... Man that nice one off was fucked by padding it so much.Trilogy?
Man fuck WB. They did this shit with The Hobbit too. The executives there don't have a fucking clue.
I don't see Radcliffe being particularly eager to take up this offer, no matter how much money Warner Brother's is looking to desperately fling in his general direction.
The guy has spent the last few years slowly distancing himself from the character by taking on a variety of different roles, mostly in low-budget, independent productions. I imagine he wants to escape being typecast, and so far has been doing a great job of cementing a respectable reputation for himself outside of Harry Potter.
I'm sure Radcliffe is very keen to put the days of random audience members yelling out "SHOW US YOUR WAND, HARRY!" in the theatre whenever he happens to get himself cast in a national production of Equus.
Harry Potter isn't the main character in this story, he's just a glorified cameo.
They're making three films out of this play.
Harry Potter will not just be a glorified cameo in this.
The story is about their children. You can expand it into three films, and it would still be about their children. There being more scenes with Harry Potter doesn't mean there will be an increased proportion of scenes with Harry Potter. I guess glorified cameo is a poor choice of words, but as a supporting role I really doubt he would turn it down. It's like Anthony Hopkins returning to each Thor film even though he clearly doesn't give a fuck about the franchise!
Did they say trilogy?? I feel so bad for them. They have nothing. Just nothing.
You think movie companies do anything that wouldn't get them money?Well, how long is the play? If it's like 2-5 hours, it'd make sense to stretch it out like that to show it completely. But if they're stretching it just to make money, they can piss up a rope.
You think movie companies do anything that wouldn't get them money?
And then Warner waves that Tony Stark money in his face and he caves
Harry Potter isn't the main character in this story, he's just a glorified cameo.
a whole trilogy of that terrible play
making the hobbit trilogy look a sane idea
Isn't he set for life?
It's written by Rowling lol
They are making a trilogy on a 36? page book in Fantastic Beasts. Main difference is that JK will work with them to rewrite.
Jack Thorne wrote Cursed Child
The movie isn't really an adaptation of the in-fiction book though, it's about the author of the in-fiction book and the adventures he went on that led to him writing the in-fiction book.