How is there nothing here​
How is there nothing here​
Oh thanks didn't know you could do that.Choose "show results as posts"
Oh thanks didn't know you could do that.
1345 quotes since 5-17-2016
around 1410 posts in the same timeframe
so the ratio is roughly 0.954
It's not shitposting if it's true.
well, that goes without sayingWow, you're a much better poster than me D:
well, that goes without sayingno one has ever said this about me
and actually I miscalculated, my post search only brings me back to 11-24-2016
1345:2595 posts = 0.5183
Welp, then you are much worse than me
How is there nothing here
The better method to objectively determine the post quality of a gaffer is the GIF/P ratio.
Now I won't be able to sleep until I know whether a yellow tag counts as positive or negative
Which is good, because I'm up against a deadline and need to work all night
That's a really stupid method.
I'd be willing to bet that "posts that get more than 3 quotes" is the strongest predictor we can get for "posts that get an user banned", and that "posts that do not get quoted" has strong negative correlation with "posts that can get an user banned"
And "Quality" is nebolous, but we can surely say it correlates negatively with posts that cause bans.
How is there nothing here
​BGBW said:Because there's no substance to anything I say.
Welp, then you are much worse than me
This is a disgusting sentiment.
It's objectively mathematics, but the qualitative attributes you're assigning to that ratio are unverifiable and steeped in misguided vanity.It's objective mathematics
I'm sorry the truth hurts
It's objectively mathematics, but the qualitative attributes you're assigning to that ratio are unverifiable and steeped in misguided vanity.
don't take it so seriouslyIt's objectively mathematics, but the qualitative attributes you're assigning to that ratio are unverifiable and steeped in misguided vanity.
don't take it so seriously
a good poster would be likely to be quoted a lot
i found method 4
It's objective mathematics
I'm sorry the truth hurts
The only thing objective is that this can determine whether your posts generate replies. What is not objective about this is whether that determines your quality as a poster. In fact, the posts that are probably quoted the least from my personal observation are those that provide a thorough, well researched contrary opinion without blatant shocking or inflammatory remarks.
Damn, that's a lot more than I thought. Not quality though lolI just did a quick check and you have been quoted more times than the search result maximum, more than 1500 times
So it's not all that bad
don't take it so seriously
everyone knows that tag-bragging is how you actually show off on GAF
/sI'm a pretty bad poster
Nobody quotes me unless I forget to add an /s tag