CarpeDeezNutz
Member
It's true, I've had three tags which means I'm the best
You got some Rolodex tag?
It's true, I've had three tags which means I'm the best
I think it's safe to say OP has an analytics addiction.
It's true, I've had three tags which means I'm the best
don't take it so seriously
everyone knows that tag-bragging is how you actually show off on GAF
Sometimes I quote myself just to artificially inflate my Q/P rating.
Man, you care way too much about what others think of your posts. Having the best posts doesn't mean you're going to be quoted the most. Indeed, joke posters get by far the most quotes, and there's nothing to indicate that their posts are the 'best'.
Just put as much effort as you can into your posts and threads, and let everything else sort itself out.
Man, you care way too much about what others think of your posts. Having the best posts doesn't mean you're going to be quoted the most. Indeed, joke posters get by far the most quotes, and there's nothing to indicate that their posts are the 'best'.
Just put as much effort as you can into your posts and threads, and let everything else sort itself out.
I'm not ashamed to admit it: I'm a quote slut. Is that so wrong?
It's an inverse correlation, especially with salary. Quality posters have more time to think, but are also unemployed. FACT.Is there a correlation between a high Q/P ratio and salary, penis size, and/or the frequency at which one obtains left swipes on tinder or grindr?
(left is the good one, right?)
I just realized a pretty big flaw in this. If one of your posts gets quoted a bunch of times, that completely throws off your Post to Quote ratio, as it's no longer a 1:1 metric of how many times you've been quoted vs. how many times you've posted, and instead a metric of how often you are quoted (from any one post or combination of posts) to how many times you post. You could get quoted a thousand times from just one post, after having posted 4,000 total posts, which none of which had been quoted before, giving you an apparent Q/P ratio of 25%, but in actuality it's .025%.
You know what I should have counted as a variable for post content? Post length.
expected searchd protocol version 1+, got version '0'
This is a quality post.Ok asteroid its time to end the human species
Welfare quote.I don't get quoted much. I'm not very insightful, funny, or make enough outrageous statements to get noticed much.
That percentage has some dubious implications about your post. I think you meant to say "I could do worse".12%... damn :/ thought it would be at least 30...
Edit: no wait, fucked up searched by threads and not posts. Lemme get the right number...
Double edit: 46%. Not bad but I could do better.
There are some funny phenomenon on this forum that I've noticed over the years, something about NeoGAF causes some to take membership in this community and their respective popularity a bit to serious.When NeoGAF becomes a problem; the thread.