Kleegamefan said:
Oh man...this is an easy one...
Sega going 3rd party and killing Dreamcast ......the fallout of this:
[snip]
C) Was probably *THE* key trigger in the now intense hatred of Sony....in many eyes, the PS2 "Killed" the DC, but more insulting, it wasn't just the PS2 itself, but the "Potential" of the kind of games it could do...in 2000, PS2 didn't have as many good games as the dreamcast but that mattered little to Sega and they killed the console anyway...it was the "Potential" of the PS2 that kill the DC....without question, we are still feeling the effects of this 7 years later...
A minor nitpick: It wasn't the PS2 "potential' that killed off the Dreamcast, it was the PS2
hype.
An embarassingly shocking number of people bought, hook, line, and sinker 99% of the PS2 hype.
70 MILLION POLYGONS PER SECOND!
20 TIMES MORE POWERFUL THAN THE DREAMCAST!!!
- it sure didn't help that, in the crushing tide of hype, a SOJ exec conceded that "the PS2, on paper, looks to be twice as powerful as the Dreamcast." It looked like it was supposed to be damage control. Twice as powerful is better than 2o times as powerful. (more on this below) But it just gave the PS2 a helping hand - not that the PS2 needed it.
IT'S A SUPERCOMPUTER!!!
GEORGE LUCAS IS GUSHING ABOUT HOW POWERFUL IT IS, AND HOW IT RIVALS THE GRAPHIC WORKSTATIONS HE'S USING TO MAKE STAR WARS ! ! ! !
- note: this was before the masses accepted that the Phantom Menace sucked, so people actually gave a shit what George Lucus said back then.
SADDAM HUSSEIN WANTS SOME PS2's SO HE CAN POWER HIS MISSILES WITH THEM!
I think the only bit of hype that most people didn't take seriously was Ken's "Jack into the matrix" twaddle.
All that hype had a huge hand in killing off the Dreamcast.
Fast forward 2 or 3 years later. All consoles, PS2, GameCube, Xbox are out.
The PS2 is the weakest graphically and has the worst load times; it's a far cry from the graphic workstation "supercomputer" that's 20 times, or even 2 times, more powerful than the Dreamcast.
But by then the PS2 had already amassed a huge library of games, many of them great games. The PS2 was where almost all third parties were concentrating their efforts, some exclusively, or virtually exclusively.
I think on of the main reasons why so many people bought the PS2's hype so uncritically was that Sony was so new and the PSX was so successful that they didn't really see any reason to doubt what Sony said. The PSX's success can't be unstated. SONY was the darkhorse newcomer that did the unprecedented: it soundly defeated two industry giants. (not that SEGA and Nintendo didn't do A LOT to defeat themselves and help SONY, but I digress . . . )
Well, the PS2 didn't live up to its hype -
that was impossible.
It seems people did learn, though. Look at how warm people were to the touted capabilities and benefits of the PS3. They were a helluva lot more critical and skeptical! Which is ironic and somewhat of a shame, because the PS3 is actually a good and truly poweful machine.