Well at the BUILD conference they did say that Microsoft is working on an Xbox 360 emulator for the Xbox One but it's proving to be difficult.
Oh God... if I could play Bayonetta and Ninja Gaiden 2 on my Xbone... oh god...
Anyway, carry on!
Well at the BUILD conference they did say that Microsoft is working on an Xbox 360 emulator for the Xbox One but it's proving to be difficult.
In what way?
I understand the appeal of this in a theoretical way, but are you all really buying an Xbox 1 and not getting Gold? I'm trying to picture the person who wants an Xbox 1 but does not want to play games online.
I understand the appeal of this in a theoretical way, but are you all really buying an Xbox 1 and not getting Gold? I'm trying to picture the person who wants an Xbox 1 but does not want to play games online.
You can access 2 day shipping without prime, you just have to pay for it. That analogy makes no sense. I pay it mostly for the free two day shipping (since I order a tons of stuff from them). Instant Video and Kindle Lender's Library are just added bonuses
Oh of course. If you're a big Halo/Gears/Forza/Fable fan then obviously the X1 is for you. I'm not arguing that.
But objectively, Sony has the better first party studio (one look at past GOTYs, and general consensus will show that).
And you earlier mentioned Killzone being the sixth entry. When it was announced I was excited but the game underdelivered. The main issue with your argument is that though Sony does release sequels (who said they didn't?) they also release a lot of new IPs to go along with them. For the last few years, MS relied exclusively on the usual, monotonous Gears/Forza, Halo/Forza yearly cycle with Fable sprinkled around. They don't seem to be changing that either which I don't like.
2014: Halo/Forza
2015: Halo/Forza/Fable
2016: Gears/Forza
H2A is more of a system seller than anything they have out or planned right now for Xbox One.
I clearly said the PS4.
I agree it's dumb having apps behind paywall, but this is dumb too, nobody buys gold to watch netflix on their Xbox console.
That won't happen.I wonder if there's potential for discounts on services through Xbox Live Gold, e.g. Netflix is $5/mo for Gold Members. Could be an interesting model for them.
That was spooky!
"Not saying everyone will love everything, but we have plans!"
Should have been like this a long time ago so I hope he makes changes, those are the kind of good things that can happen when you fall behind.
In the context of the original question... that sounds weird.
Remakes of older titles have never been system sellers.
That was spooky!
Once they announce the Games with Gold subscription plan for Xbox One (like PS+) they aren't going to need to lock people in with apps anymore. They can just require you to subscribe to Gold in order to maintain access to your free games. The apps paywall won't be needed anymore so it's very believeable they will drop it.
And exactly that makes it even more nonsensical to put it behind a paywall. They'll most likely get just a flimsy tiny profit out of it while damaging their reputationI agree it's dumb having apps behind paywall, but this is dumb too, nobody buys gold to watch netflix on their Xbox console.
Heh: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=797312&highlight=ps4+owner
"In the wake of the news that The Last of Us is coming to PS4, I thought I would jump aboard the PS4 owners ship and grab myself Sony's machine."
But that's a smaller market.
Microsoft has consumers quite literally paying for nothing. There is no way they are going to end a business model like that. As slimy as it is, it's also quite genius.
Oh of course. If you're a big Halo/Gears/Forza/Fable fan then obviously the X1 is for you. I'm not arguing that.
But objectively, Sony has the better first party studio (one look at past GOTYs, and general consensus will show that).
And you earlier mentioned Killzone being the sixth entry. When it was announced I was excited but the game underdelivered. The main issue with your argument is that though Sony does release sequels (who said they didn't?) they also release a lot of new IPs to go along with them. For the last few years, MS relied exclusively on the usual, monotonous Gears/Forza, Halo/Forza yearly cycle with Fable sprinkled around. They don't seem to be changing that either which I don't like.
2014: Halo/Forza
2015: Halo/Forza/Fable
2016: Gears/Forza
Microsoft has consumers quite literally paying for nothing. There is no way they are going to end a business model like that. As slimy as it is, it's also quite genius.
Online multiplayer games are pretty popular y'know.
Arstechnica - Sources: Xbox Live to remove Gold requirement for Netflix, HuluWe can report that multiple sources within Microsoft have been briefed on plans to make a long-awaited change to the Xbox Live Gold paywall for streaming media services. According to our sources, Xbox 360 and Xbox One users will soon no longer need a paid subscription to Xbox Live Gold to access Netflix, Hulu, and other streaming media apps.
Arstechnica is reporting hearing from multiple sources within Microsoft that they are dropping the paywall for apps. I thought about making a new thread for this but figured since it's still not official, I'd list it here. I definitely trust them though more than almost every gaming site.
Arstechnica - Sources: Xbox Live to remove Gold requirement for Netflix, Hulu
Arstechnica is reporting hearing from multiple sources within Microsoft that they are dropping the paywall for apps. I thought about making a new thread for this but figured since it's still not official, I'd list it here. I definitely trust them though more than almost every gaming site.
Sources: Xbox Live to remove Gold requirement for Netflix, Hulu - Arstechnica
I would love to see MP taken out from behind the paywall but I seriously doubt it will happen.