Nintendoga
Member
I bought this game on a PS3. Never again I told myself.
Unless the PS4 version is super gorgeous, then yeah totally.
Unless the PS4 version is super gorgeous, then yeah totally.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim... coming to PS4 and Xbox One? (Bethesda: Nope)
- Thread starter maltrain
- Start date
Things don't work that way, sorry.
I had around 52-55 fps most of the time.
But I wouldnt mind if this was locked 30fps with mega textures and better drawdistance etc.
Then what's the problem with my 570? Is it dying?
New consoles still have 5400rpm drives though, don't they?
What CPU do you have? Do you have everything cranked up to max?
illmatic19
Member
How I'm feeling, wouldn't buy it at full price either.
I'd agree with you but they've been making open world RPG for almost two decades, I'm sure they know how to manage these kind of projects. I'm not saying that creating these games is simple, I would just be disapointed if their first next-gen game is a port of Skyrim... I want a new Elder Scroll!
Why would it need to load from the harddrive when you have 8 GB DDR ?
Miles Quaritch
Member
Don't Beth have a no HD remake rule?
That's the reason they gave and continue to give when people ask for a Morrowind remake...
That's the reason they gave and continue to give when people ask for a Morrowind remake...
No reason to think that would carry over, the PS3 was a completely different beast to port for.
The first load, coming from a powered down state.
gamerforever
Banned
Well Bethesda kind of owe us gamers a proper version of Skyrim!
Would happily pay £50 for the definitive edition if it was 1080P (standard for PS4) and at least 30 FPS, but 60 shouldn't be a problem for Sony's beast of a machine!
Would happily pay £50 for the definitive edition if it was 1080P (standard for PS4) and at least 30 FPS, but 60 shouldn't be a problem for Sony's beast of a machine!
Shit, I want a new Elder Scrolls/Fallout more than anyone!
*If* this rumor is true, I imagine its probably a pretty barebones port and something to just take advantage of the early console 'lack of games'. I doubt they have some massive team working on this that's drawing away valuable resources from Fallout 4.
I'm assuming you're just joking, but on the internet, I can never be sure.
Intel Core i7 860 and no, I have everything on High with 4x AA, and FXAA turned off.
Even if I put everything on low with AA off, I still have the same framerate of 30 to 40. I have the latest Nvidia drivers too.
Canis lupus
Member
It does. Its not unheard of for a company to compensate its customers with a better product.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
I'm lttp with Skyrim on 360, and am loving it! I would definitely double dip and pick up a PS4 version!
StriateEnd
Banned
Nope, not triple dipping.
PS3 Skyrim at launch was terrible, I only bought it because it was on sale for like 20 quid at GAME (uk) for the PS3. However, when I got the Legendary Edition on Steam and installed HD textures, ENBs and other mods (character mods, village/town mods, dragon mods etc), the game got considerably better. But that didn't really fix the poor melee combat, boring story, repetitive side quests and the fact that your character had zero influence on the world even though you were the leader of various guilds and the friggin dragonborn.
Mediocre game on consoles. Fun yet flawed game on PC with mods. I have a feeling Bethesda will get it right in Elder Scrolls 6. If they improve their world design (no more copy paste mountains and forests and villages), use that awesome lore to write a good story, decrease the amount of fetch/kill quests by a lot, better melee combat (I thought magic looked very pretty even on vanilla skyrim) and have NPCs interact with you differently if you are, say, the leader of the mage guild, then we've got ourselves an amazing game.
PS3 Skyrim at launch was terrible, I only bought it because it was on sale for like 20 quid at GAME (uk) for the PS3. However, when I got the Legendary Edition on Steam and installed HD textures, ENBs and other mods (character mods, village/town mods, dragon mods etc), the game got considerably better. But that didn't really fix the poor melee combat, boring story, repetitive side quests and the fact that your character had zero influence on the world even though you were the leader of various guilds and the friggin dragonborn.
Mediocre game on consoles. Fun yet flawed game on PC with mods. I have a feeling Bethesda will get it right in Elder Scrolls 6. If they improve their world design (no more copy paste mountains and forests and villages), use that awesome lore to write a good story, decrease the amount of fetch/kill quests by a lot, better melee combat (I thought magic looked very pretty even on vanilla skyrim) and have NPCs interact with you differently if you are, say, the leader of the mage guild, then we've got ourselves an amazing game.
If turning AA down has no effect, it sounds like you're hitting a CPU bottleneck. Being a slightly older CPU too would support that notion, although I'd expect some sort of improvement with *everything* turned to low.
Not retroactively like that, on completely different platforms.
VicDaMoan03
Member
Someone tweet Pete Hines about this shit. He should be able to dispel a fake if it indeed is a hoax. I would but don't have Twitter anymore.
Edit: Damn saw post/tweet above me. How about the email? Has he responded to that?
Edit: Damn saw post/tweet above me. How about the email? Has he responded to that?
Cynn
Member
Argh damn it.Pete Hines says it was a bug in the CMS.
SuicidalSteve
Member
Pete Hines says it was a bug in the CMS.
SOME games? What were the others I wonder?
VicDaMoan03
Member
Pete Hines says it was a bug in the CMS.
How about the email? Has he responded to that?
VicDaMoan03
Member
Damn it!
Blue Ninja
Member
SJRB
Gold Member
Well there you go. We've been fooled once again.
VicDaMoan03
Member
2 dreams crushed in a single day.
Crushed in a span of two minutes for me. I know its not their fault, but I just want to be so mad at Bethesda for some reason.
Its been over two years since Skyrim has been released and not even an announcement yet? Other developers (like DICE) have released released new games and moved onto 3rd games in that same timeline.
immortal-joe
Member
Mods on PC practically make this game for me, so thanks but no thanks.
Edit: oh, seems fake.
Edit: oh, seems fake.
Gillian Seed
Banned
This could still be announced. It seems like a no brainer to me.
Noisepurge
Member
and most likely no mod support, for some reason even last gen the heralded champion of all things, Unreal Tournament 3 was the only game that supported mods, mouses and keyboards!
Why the sad face, that means FALLOUT 4 IS BEING ANNOUNCED THS SUNDAY!
It really doesn't take a beefy PC to run it decently. It also has native support for the 360 controller, so you can just run an HDMI cable to your TV/receiver and call it a day.
Their optical disk drive speeds are much higher than last gen, even the 5400RPM hard drives are probably faster than the old ones even at the same RPM (a desktop 5400rpm from 7 years ago to one from now is still quite a difference, even if no 5400 is particularly zippy). Plus, with 8GB RAM and a game using assets built for less, they can preload more into the memory hopefully, so aside from the first loading screen maybe there will be fewer.
My PC is as old as the hills, and I don't play games on my MBA (assuming it's even available for OSX). But really, I struggle to find the time to play games on the platforms I do own, so another platform isn't going to help that.
It's OK, I'll live. Maybe they won't fuck up the next Elder Scrolls game they release on a PS platform (Online doesn't count).