It's pretty amusing. Been watching him talk nonsense the entire thread, and be corrected by people over and over. His narrative has gone from this all being untrue, and that the said Nvidia cards have been able to do this exact same type of async compute all along (despite the evidence, benchmarks, and everything else to the contrary), to then changing to push this notion that it's not even important except for consoles with a terrible cpu's lol.
Lololol, butthurts everywhere.
From the very start of the thread:
That aside, Nvidia GPUs being bad at switching between compute and graphical tasks is old news. We all have suffered FPS tanking when activating Physx even on high end GPUs.
Some of you really have to learn how to read and write on a discussion board, beyond your heathen beliefs, and understand than brand loyalism isn't that strong on the PC sphere as it is on the console or even phone market.
Then, the CPU thing is important to note because the people who buys a 980ti/Fury usually is sitting on top of a high end i7 with threads to spare. Telling said people that their current cards are obsolete for DX12 because they don't support an AMD feature that isn't part of DX12 is unchaste and tendentious.
I understand that some of you have some sort of agenda, being GPU brand or console rooted doesn't matter, but some of us doesn't care about it. You keep saying that Maxwell is doomed for DX12 even when, async, serial or broken, Maxwell keeps being faster in a worst case scenario than current AMD offerings.
Most people who have a clue will tell you the same, this is pretty good for PS4, not that good for XOne, and meaningless for PC gaming.
I enjoy techie stuff and try to learn how things works, don't care so much about people feelings about brands tbh. I would enjoy you teaching me where was I wrong in this thread, so I could learn something useful. But remember, I don't care at all about your religion substitutes.
There is a reason for Horse Armour being that funny in this forum