• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku has been blacklisted by Bethesda Softworks and Ubisoft

Somnia

Member
To be clear, we've been blacklisted by both companies. Because we do real reporting and refuse to act as publishers' marketing arms. If anyone has any questions, let me know.

Keep up the good work, Kotaku is one of the few sites who seem to do actual journalism. Not saying there aren't others, but I like the work you guys do.
 

Broken Joystick

At least you can talk. Who are you?
To be clear, we've been blacklisted by both companies. Because we do real reporting and refuse to act as publishers' marketing arms. If anyone has any questions, let me know.

Will Kotaku ever go out of their way to "make up" with these companies, or will you simply remain as you always have? Will we be informed if they ever decide to "make up" with you?

"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

You mean like they've been doing for a long while now? What the hell are you talking about?
 
For the past two years, Kotaku has been blacklisted by Bethesda, the publisher of the Fallout and Elder Scrolls series. For the past year, we have also been, to a lesser degree, ostracized by Ubisoft, publisher of Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry and more.

Last two years for Bethesda and the last year for Ubi and they're just finding outnow?
Typical slowtaku.

#meme
 

Omikaru

Member
It's sad that Kotaku got blacklisted, but these self-destructive acts only give Kotaku ammunition in the future to tout their integrity and make the publishers look even worse. Seems the chickens are coming home to roost today, even though Totilo had the good grace to try and repair the relationships in secret, without having to name and shame.

Serves them right that it's come to this.

Brian Crecente-era Kotaku, yes.

Totilo has turned that place around.

Yup. Totilo has done some great work to make Kotaku one of the better ones, and he's got some good people working on their output.
 
Well stop fucking leaking things then. If you're privy to information that you know will be officially announced soon, then why damage your relationship with that company by leaking it earlier? Leaks aren't doing some "public good" or bringing to light anything games need to know and can't wait a while to find out

They weren't blacklisted for criticizing, they were blacklisted for revealing the existence of a game that hadn't been Announced yet.

That's just as bullshit a reason. Tons of big outlets leak info about new tech when it comes available (I mean how many "New iPhone leaks" have you seen?), and you don't see them getting blacklisted.
 

pastrami

Member
I noticed that every article linked to in this one is by Stephen Totilo or Jason Schreier. Easily two of the best in the industry. Keep up the great work.
 
Regardless of the fact that I've been ignoring Kotaku for a while now, I am glad to see them not submit to being an extension of the game industries marketing arm. Unfortunately journalism in our sector (and in general) needs lots more improvement still.
 
"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

friday-damn.gif
 

MayMay

Banned
I hate leaks, they're awful.

If I was working on a game Id want to present it to the public when its ready and not when some dumb Kotaku "journalists" think its ready.

So fuck em, honestly.

Like when they leaked the Fallout 4 voice actor documents, spoiling us on the setting and more of the game years before it was even announced.
 
So you don't want there to be anything remotely resembling journalism for video games

Well leaking games before their announced shouldn't be all there is to games journalism, should it? I'd definitely side with Kotaku if this was a Kane & Lynch issue, and they were being blacklisted over negative comments, review scores, indictments of those companies, etc, but for leaks? I mean, that's common sense that you'll ruin relationships that way. I mean, NDAs are signed for a reason, right?
 
Keep doing the non-PR stories and leaks and screw the pubs. It's the only thing worth reading anyway.

Kotaku really turned themselves around and are probably the closest thing we have to gaming journalism
 
"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

Kinda hard to do real journalism if two of the biggest players on the videogame market to refuse to give any sort of comment for any sort of story you might be writing (including those about them).
 

_woLf

Member
I'd personally argue that reporting on the existence of unannounced games doesn't do much but instill early expectations from the fanbase which ultimately leads to a game not hitting those expectations.

There are times when reporting on leaks are okay. To me, personally, reporting big details about Fallout 4 almost 2 years in advance is not okay. Nothing good came from that expect for website hits on Kotaku, hurt feelings, early expectations and disappointed developers. Sure, whoever leaks the stuff to begin with needs to just simply not do that, but sometimes reporting on leaks can do more harm than good.

Just my two cents, I guess. Boasting that you reveal games way in advance (which has a multitude of effects on the developer, the publisher, and the fanbase) isn't exactly something to be proud of in my opinion.

Features like those exposing work conditions at Rockstar are good. Acting like a victim because you front-paged something that was not meant for public eyes (and not for any sneaky reason other than it wasn't done yet and announcing a game is a huge part of a game's marketing push) is kinda off-putting to me.
 
"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

If that's how you feel, what do you think about the outlets that haven't been blacklisted?
 

Baleoce

Member
It is kind of sad tbh. Publishers don't for one second view these kinds of sites as grounds for fair critique. They just see them as potential marketing space, and when it doesn't play out as such, they respond accordingly.
 

RulkezX

Member
Nothing of value was lost as far as I'm concerned.

Makes it that much more laughable that people championing ethics in games journalism focus on indie developers with no power or influence rather than AAA publishers.

No you're right , we should applaud any publisher blacklisting sites they don't like and only speaking to friendly sites.

If you don't like Kotaku fine , but your stance is fucking stupid.
 

Mivey

Member
Once again the gaming industry goes out of its way to show how petty and unprofessional it is.

I think that's petty and also now the Streisand effect will do it's job. Good job publishers?
I think it just show that gaming as an industry is basically in the same state as movies in the "golden era" when everything was controlled by a few large studios. I'm pretty sure in those times certain journalistic outlets could also be "shunned" if they'd angered Warner Bros. or somesuch.

Also, the fact that Kotaku is doing just fine without Bethesda and Ubisoft "helping" them also shows that it is mostly the publishers that need the media, not the other way around.
 
Press sneak fu--oh, beaten, nevermind.

I'll see myself out.

Good on you, Kotaku, for sticking to your guns.

On an facetious note, I like the phrase "dozens of months." If only there were a word that meant "12 months."
 

FX-GMC

Member
Well stop fucking leaking things then. If you're privy to information that you know will be officially announced soon, then why damage your relationship with that company by leaking it earlier? Leaks aren't doing some "public good" or bringing to light anything games need to know and can't wait a while to find out

Journalism is the activity of gathering, assessing, creating, and presenting news and information. It is also the product of these activities.

So you want them to stop being journalists?
 
Well stop fucking leaking things then. If you're privy to information that you know will be officially announced soon, then why damage your relationship with that company by leaking it earlier? Leaks aren't doing some "public good" or bringing to light anything games need to know and can't wait a while to find out

Then why have any coverage of games if the only publishable material is on the game maker's schedule and only with their complete control over the editorial message?

I mean, NDAs are signed for a reason, right?

What NDA did Kotaku sign and then break?
 

Dennis

Banned
"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

Well, there it is.

Time to be journalist and not run a fan site.

The good news is that it frees Kotaku to express unadulterated opinions on games from these publishers.
 
Kotaku played a pretty big part in exposing Zenimax and Bethesda for their vampiric bullshit to a lot of people so I'm not surprised there. I'm surprised that the rest of the gaming journalism circle didn't take that shit and run with it, in fact. Bethesda deserves to be kept under a watchful fucking eye, even if there were only a hint of truth to the allegations made toward them re: Arkane and Human Head.

In forums, I tend to immediately assume that people with Kotaku-related problems have Gamergate sympathies.

So what you're saying is that you have never ever been on an internet gaming forum before last year?
 

Kalopsia

Neo Member
Publishers with a history of being heavy-handed don't like it when you leak their shit?

Who would have thought.
 

Ashtar

Member
I'm guessing the Bethesda is because of the uncovering of their underhanded dealings with that one game prey 2 or something.
For Ubi I guess it's about them always leaking the new ac months in advance which is annoying to me bc I'm a big fan of the franchise and like to imagine what it could be but still no reason to black list them.

I know it's counter culture but I actually like kotaku
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
"A Price Of Games Journalism"

The horror. You mean now they'll have to do their job without the blessing and support of these big corporations? Like real journalists?

^

I really don't see what's so wrong about this.

Why would Ubisoft and Bethesda continue a professional relationship with a website that fucks their PR plans over and over? Not to say Kotaku should stop, because they shouldn't, but I also don't expect those companies to continue to help them out.

If you keep biting the hand that feeds you, don't be shocked when it no longer wants to give you free games, I mean food.
 

Curufinwe

Member
I'd personally argue that reporting on the existence of unannounced games doesn't do much but instill early expectations from the fanbase which ultimately leads to a game not hitting those expectations.

There are times when reporting on leaks are okay. To me, personally, reporting big details about Fallout 4 almost 2 years in advance is not okay. Nothing good came from that expect for website hits on Kotaku, hurt feelings, early expectations and disappointed developers. Sure, whoever leaks the stuff to begin with needs to just simply not do that, but sometimes reporting on leaks can do more harm than good.

Just my two cents, I guess. Boasting that you reveal games way in advance (which has a multitude of effects on the developer, the publisher, and the fanbase) isn't exactly something to be proud of in my opinion.

If they get the leaks then they should report on them.

However I don't blame the companies for responding in this manner.
 

jschreier

Member
Will Kotaku ever go out of their way to "make up" with these companies, or will you simply remain as you always have? Will we be informed if they ever decide to "make up" with you?
While it'd certainly be nice to get responses when we ask Bethesda or Ubisoft PR for questions about, say, bugs in their games, or issues at their companies, it's not necessary. We have no plans to change anything in our approach to reporting and serving readers just to make up with publishers that try to make our jobs more difficult.

BTW, our Fallout 4 review, which was published yesterday, eight days after the game's release, based on a copy we bought ourselves, is already at a quarter million pageviews. And growing.
 

NeOak

Member
Well leaking games before their announced shouldn't be all there is to games journalism, should it? I'd definitely side with Kotaku if this was a Kane & Lynch issue, and they were being blacklisted over negative comments, review scores, indictments of those companies, etc, but for leaks? I mean, that's common sense that you'll ruin relationships that way. I mean, NDAs are signed for a reason, right?


Hahaha hahaha hahaha haha haha ha

That's not how the world works.
 
Top Bottom