• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Battlefield 5 retail listing at World of Games (Swiss), "tactical shooter in WW1"

DeepEnigma

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Puppen said:
There were no combat aircrafts is what he likely meant. It's a valid point. BF5 practically has to flub history to make a game set in this time period with the expected amount of variety.
Click to expand...

Good. Outside of those who mainly use air vehicles... the rest of the players always complain about them anyhow. ;)

Being Tongue in Cheek of course. With a huge dash of serious.
 
LiquidMetal14

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Honestly I would take Battlefield size maps and gameplay with the smaller building tactical elements and that would really take Battlefield to another level.

Keeping the scale but also focusing on the smaller scale encounter as you would have like in a Rainbow 6 type of game.
 
5

5taquitos

Member
JJD said:
There are good WW1 airplane and dogfight sims, I just don't think they would fit with the BF experience.
Click to expand...

If anything, it would fit even better. Slower planes means it's easier to make strafing runs on infantry, no lock-ons mean dogfights have to be up close and personal, hell you could even drop grenades out of the cockpit. I think WW1 combat would be perfect for that BF-brand chaos.
 
DeepEnigma

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
5taquitos said:
If anything, it would fit even better. Slower planes means it's easier to make strafing runs on infantry, no lock-ons mean dogfights have to be up close and personal, hell you could even drop grenades out of the cockpit. I think WW1 combat would be perfect for that BF-brand chaos.
Click to expand...

Like the sound of this.
 
P

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
5taquitos said:
If anything, it would fit even better. Slower planes means it's easier to make strafing runs on infantry, no lock-ons mean dogfights have to be up close and personal, hell you could even drop grenades out of the cockpit. I think WW1 combat would be perfect for that BF-brand chaos.
Click to expand...
Yup, or even just take out your pistol and try to shoot the enemy pilot like in the way old days, lol.
 
C

CosmicQueso

Member
JJD said:
Airplanes were mostly used for reconnaissance for the majority the WW1. Have fun flying a plane doing nothing but spotting in BFWW1. Gun/propeller synchronization was only achieved close to the end of the war.
Click to expand...

Look, if you don't want the setting, that's fine. But please quit making up stuff. It's annoying.

In 1915, the Dutch aircraft manufacturer Anthony Fokker, who was working for the Germans, perfected a French invention allowing machine-gun fire through the propeller.
Click to expand...

"End of the war"

During 1915, another important step was taken when the Germans organised strategic bombing over Britain and France by Zeppelin airships
Click to expand...

"Mostly reconnaissance"

Aviation made huge technological leaps forward during the conflict. The war in the air also proved to be a field of experimentation where tactics and doctrines were imagined and tested. Air force units were reorganised on numerous occasions to meet the growing need of this new weapon. Crucially, aerial strategies developed during the First World War laid the foundations for a modern form of warfare in the sky.
Click to expand...

Source: British Library

E.B.E said:
Well apparently the rumour is now that the tweet is referring to an announcement of 4xp for BF4. FFS.

https://twitter.com/TheFixnow/status/721018911072903172
Click to expand...

Welp. That's a bummer.

ScreenHunter_123-Aug.-13-11.03.jpg


Image is a known fake.
 
Digital-Hero

Digital-Hero

Member
orava said:
2002
"Tired of this futuristic bullshit"

2007
"Tired of this ww2 bullshit"

2012
"Tired of this modern warfare bullshit."

2016
"Tired of this futuristic bullshit"
Click to expand...

I see a trend. I was tired of WW2 back in 2004 though.

WW1 sounds worse. Battlefield 5: Wait in Trench Simulator until you are starved or gased"
 
P

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
JJD said:
I'm arguing about fun, not realism. I think WW1 could work for a game like Arma, but I don't believe it would work for a BF game.
Click to expand...
I wasn't saying you were arguing about realism. I was saying you were ignoring the massive concessions other Battlefield games have made at the expense of realism in favour of fun while bringing up nonsense you just perceive to be realistic about World War 1 to argue that it would be a bad fit. Even if the things you are making up were realistic, they still wouldn't have merit as criticisms because no war setting has been portrayed realistically in any Battlefield game.
E.B.E said:
Well apparently the rumour is now that the tweet is referring to an announcement of 4xp for BF4. FFS.

https://twitter.com/TheFixnow/status/721018911072903172
Click to expand...
lmao
 
J

JJD

Member
CosmicQueso said:
Look, if you don't want the setting, that's fine. But please quit making up stuff. It's annoying.



"End of the war"



"Mostly reconnaissance"



Source: British Library
Click to expand...

So getting some dates wrong is making something up? Please.

Are you seriously arguing that bombing zeppelins would be fun to have in a BF game?

Well have fun with your imaginary WW1 Battlefield game.

Thankfully this tweet was just about some stupid 4 XP event and not about this rumor.
 
5

5taquitos

Member
JJD said:
So getting some dates wrong is making something up? Please.
Click to expand...

When you say that shooting through props didn't happen until the end of the war, when in reality it was happening 3 years before the war ended, that's more than getting a date wrong.
 
Hexa

Hexa

Member
orava said:
2002
"Tired of this futuristic bullshit"

2007
"Tired of this ww2 bullshit"

2012
"Tired of this modern warfare bullshit."

2016
"Tired of this futuristic bullshit"
Click to expand...

I mean, that's what happens when the entire industry seems to jump on to the same thing at the same time trying to appeal to the same people. Those people get tired of it. Then someone takes the first step in making something great outside of that limited area that a good portion of the industry seems to be targeting. And then suddenly that's what everyone is targeting. Rinse repeat.
 
K

KnightHart

Member
Puppen said:
Who the fuck is even still playing BF4
Click to expand...

A lot of people apparently. It helps that the game has dropped to $5-10 USD countless times in the past year, and the game has slowly been getting better and better with every patch. All of this of course is supplemented by DICE LA's support through the CTE and free map DLC. BF4 is most definitely a game I'd recommend to people looking for a new FPS to play on PC. Game is definitely still a looker, runs like a dream on even mid-range PC's, and its MP content is fully fledged out now. I feel like most mainline Battlefield games tend to have a lot of retention power. I remember still being able to find BF1942 servers in like 2008-2009.

I just want Rainbow 6 Siege to reach this status at some point. It deserves a second chance, just forgive Uplay... Now and then ;_;
 
J

JJD

Member
5taquitos said:
When you say that shooting through props didn't happen until the end of the war, when in reality it was happening 3 years before the war ended, that's more than getting a date wrong.
Click to expand...

???

It's the very definition of getting a date wrong.

You know what? Whatever man.

I hope you guys get a WW1 game the way you want. I just hope it's not BF.
 
W

wowbaggerBR

Member
Amazing, there is a relentless notion that the WWI was a static and utterly boring thing to make a videogame of.

Welp, after seeing some posts around here... enough internet for today.
 
5

5taquitos

Member
JJD said:
???

It's the very definition of getting a date wrong.

You know what? Whatever man.

I hope you guys get a WW1 game the way you want. I just hope it's not BF.
Click to expand...

You're right, it's still just a wrong date, that was a bit strong. I just mean that getting the date wrong in this case misconstrues a major aspect of the way the war was fought.
 
M

marrec

Banned
wowbaggerBR said:
Amazing, there is a relentless notion that the WWI was a static and utterly boring thing to make a videogame of.

Welp, after seeing some posts around here... enough internet for today.
Click to expand...

It's not a big deal, people just know fuck all about WWI, no need to get riled up about it.

In fact, this BF game would provide a great opportunity to teach some people about the realities of WWI.
 
Z

zero86r

Member
wowbaggerBR said:
Amazing, there is a relentless notion that the WWI was a static and utterly boring thing to make a videogame of.

Welp, after seeing some posts around here... enough internet for today.
Click to expand...
Just preconceived notions people have, it's a shame really. Final year of University I got to write some really interesting essays and a thesis on WW1, my eyes were really opened to the reality of what went on.
 
J

JJD

Member
5taquitos said:
You're right, it's still just a wrong date, that was a bit strong. I just mean that getting the date wrong in this case misconstrues a major aspect of the way the war was fought.
Click to expand...

You're right, I got the date completely wrong and airplanes had a bigger impact than I thought.

I just can't see that setting being fun. Why not go WW2 if you want a setting like that since it opens up way more possibilities? I think WW1 would be too restrictive.

I'm probably wrong again and I know someone will correct me, but infantry weapons on WW1 were mostly non automatic rifles and pistols right? Automatic machine guns were mostly stationary no?

The World War setting is great for games and FPS, fighting on a war ravaged european city is cool and all but if DICE wants this just go back to WW2 that actually provides considerably more gameplay opportunities.

CosmicQueso said:
Enjoy wallowing in your ignorance.
Click to expand...

Did I touch a nerve when I joked about your bombing zeppelin exemple? It was only a jest.

Some people are so thin-skinned.
 
C

Camp Freddie

Member
Damn, I was hoping for an officer class that could go over the top with nothing but a stick and a whistle. That'll give old Fritz a damn good thrashing!

Of course, EA would make me unlock the stick by getting 50,000 teamkills in the Somme mission.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Phil Spencer interview - Says that their intent is for all Xbox games, including Call of Duty, to be available on Xbox Game Pass Day One
2 3
102
6K
Kenneth Haight replied
Battlefield 1 |OT2| "All Quiet on the GAF Front"
33 34 35 36 37
2K
198K
Insane Metal replied
Battlefield 1 |OT| Make War Great Again
396 397 398 399 400
20K
1M
Fluffhead14 replied
One Year Later: Does XB1 still lag behind PS4 for new digital game releases? (yes)
2 3 4 5 6
289
41K
Head.spawn replied
NeoGAF Official SEGA SATURN Community
NSFW Games 26 27 28 29 30
1K
169K
Daniel Thomas MacInnes replied
Top Bottom