You must be pretty alone then because BF4 had an incredible retention rate.Why is everyone so hyped? DICE hasn't left me feeling very confident since BF4 came out
You must be pretty alone then because BF4 had an incredible retention rate.Why is everyone so hyped? DICE hasn't left me feeling very confident since BF4 came out
So we should not be hyped because you aren't confident in DICE.Why is everyone so hyped? DICE hasn't left me feeling very confident since BF4 came out
DICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
DICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
Remaining optimistic for the campaignDICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
DICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
looks really cool, but still not 100% sold on WW1, will see when beta comes
name is stupid through, I mean Battlefield 1, really....
Fantastic news, game just keeps looking better and better.Watch as they remove the server browser and have matchmaking only a la Battlefront. I cry.
Will there be a SP campaign ?
I dont wanna sound insensitive, but.... It was more than 100 years ago....
Of course, then I read that last line and lost all shits given. What the hell?
This.
The people that get offended by stuff like this are amusing. I've been to Afghanistan twice. I don't get offended by things made about what has happened over there. Games and movies could never accurately capture what the experience is like to be there. They are made with entertainment in mind.
There also needs to be a console server browser and server renting like BF3, BF4, and BFH.This game isn't meant for as casual audiences as Battlefront was, so I'm guessing they'll just use Battlelog again.
This. Game looks great but I want to see gameplay
when people say that, they aren't referring to Battlefield. every game isn't Valiant Hearts, just like every war movie isn't Saving Private Ryan.
It's interesting to see Battlefield go to the complete opposite direction of CoD, though I guess it would have to in order to stand out. The setting is certainly fresh and it has me intrigued even though I haven't played Battlefield since Bad Company 2.
Hope we can squad join from day one.
In the livestream they were saying your squad is now a group that can go around throughout modes and maps.
I'm just curious as to how DICE can make such good looking games compared to the lackluster COD games. Doesn't Activision make like a ton more money...
Exactly.Why would they spend all that money on improving their engine? It's not like their games don't already sell. When they're no longer the dominant player sitting on their laurels, then they will be forced to make capital investments in creating or appropriating significant technological upgrades. Until then, milk it baby!
DICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
In the livestream they were saying your squad is now a group that can go around throughout modes and maps.
If there is no server browser or community rentable servers they might as well cancel the pc version.I know this SOUNDS good, but it has me slightly worried about the server situation surrounding this game. If this is another Battlefront nightmare on PC with a blackbox matchmaker only and no community servers, then I'm totally out no matter how good it may look.
I HOPE DICE isn't that stupid to burn their community like that, but with EA pulling the strings....I dunno.
This turns my stomach. Just flat out the most offensive game I've ever seen.
I can name family members that died in this conflict, wept at the pictures and accounts of the dead and maimed that experienced this hell, was taught all the horrors of it from primary school, through my whole life, it's only ever been a symbol of the folly of war, the worst, most black and shameful era of British and European history. I've been to the actual battlefields and mass graves across Europe, held the minutes silence without fail every rememberence day my entire life, for as long as I could understand the meaning of it.
There was no glory in this war. No thrilling action or daring do, no heroes and villains, this was mass murder, a scar on the history of our species, and every single person involved in it was a victim.
This trailer, the entire concept of this game, makes me feel physically sick, and just so fucking angry.
How fucking dare anyone make a game like this about the First World War.
I don't know what's worse, the sick fucking emotionless, greedy cunts that would seriously exploit this horror of an industrialised massacre, or the ignorant, soulless bastards that will give them money and enjoy it.
Anyone involved in this, or seriously think of buying this, should be ashamed of themselves.
DICE commented on including the Harlem Hellfighter and the Bedouin woman and noted they were both playable (which was probably obvious): http://venturebeat.com/2016/05/06/ea-dices-lead-designer-answers-our-questions-about-battlefield-1/
So they're going to butcher historical accuracy in order to make the game fun right? Because sticking to a realistic WW1 setting would probably result in unfun guns, vehicles and equipment.
Why is everyone so hyped? DICE hasn't left me feeling very confident since BF4 came out
Do people actually think of EA as a conservative company?
They publicly march in gay pride parades in every city they're in.
They encourage staff to feel comfortable being publicly transgendered.
They put out AAA games starring women.
They have multiple AAA projects being helmed by women.
There was already a black man on the cover for Battlefield Hardline, which starred a hispanic man, a black man, and an asian woman.
They're not exactly Trump-central.
Wow, looks completely uninteresting.
What you won't enjoy your guns jamming every other bullet? If the gun fires at all.
Wow, looks completely uninteresting.
That, and trench warfare wasn't known to be the most exciting. Planes were also in their infancy. I'm sure the game will be great, but I just find the choice of WW1 kind of odd.
I don't mean to be cynical, but at what? That wasn't gameplay...